Case law

09-21 001

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 27, 2015

Shedden v. Principi, 381 F.3d 1163 (Fed. Cir. 2004); see also Hickson v. West, 12 Vet. App. 247, 253 (1999), citing Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996). … Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 67, 74 (1997); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469 (1994); see also Cartright v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.

Katherine Coffman v. Special Counsel

2022 MSPB 18 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 29, 2022

Yorkshire v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 746 F.2d 1454, 1457 (Fed. Cir. 1984). … Krafsur v.

09-11 619

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 27, 2015

The Board finds that all necessary development has been accomplished. See Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384 (1993). … In this case, the Board finds that the Veteran's lay testimony is not credible. Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 511-12 (1995).

National Silver Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 88 · United States Customs Court · Feb 16, 1967

Murphey & Co. v. United States, 44 Cust. … Butler Brothers v. United States, 4 Cust. Ct. 120 , C.D. 303; M. & D. Miller, Inc. v.

Rowell v. Commissioner

12 B.T.A. 1197 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 6, 1928

ROWELL, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Rowell v. Commissioner Docket No. 13648. United States Board of Tax Appeals 12 B.T.A. 1197 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3391 ; July 6, 1928 , Promulgated *3391 1. … Brown & Boles at one time kept a garage in Stamford and the debt was collectible, but they have not been in Stamford since 1917.

190220-3183

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2019

before the Board at this time with respect to this disability. … BROWN Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board Department of Veterans Affairs The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided.

Ford Lumber & Building Supply, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 1, 2019

See, Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. Murphy, 823 F.3d 622,626 (Fed. Cir. 2016). … Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Watkins, 11 F.3d 1573, 1583-84 (Fed. Cir. 1993); Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006).

Norman B. Livermore & Co. v. Commissioner

11 B.T.A. 428 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 6, 1928

The same rule is announced in Barroilhet v. Anspacher, 68 Cal. 116 ; 8 Pac. 804 ; Brown v. Spencer, 163 Cal. 589 ; 126 Pac. 493 ; Pavlovich v. Pavlovich, 22 Cal. App. 500 ; 135 Pac. 303 ; Lezinsky v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.

Central Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

11 B.T.A. 1017 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 4, 1928

CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Central Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner Docket No. 10927. … Brown, Esq., for the respondent.

New Dynamics Foundation v. United States

70 Fed. Cl. 782 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 24, 2006

in Board-approved charitable activities. … Corp. v. FCC, 292 F.3d 749, 753 (D.C.Cir.2002); Brown v. Bd. of Trustees of the Bldg. Serv. 32B-J Pension Fund, 392 F.Supp.2d 434, 445-46 (E.D.N.Y.2005); Anderson v. United States, 799 F.Supp. 1198, 1202 (C.I.T.1992).

R-A

24 I. & N. Dec. 629 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2008

(quoting INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 110 (1988))); Jian Hui Shao v. … Ass’n v. Brand X Internet Servs., 545 U.S. 967, 982 (2005) (quoting Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., 517 U.S. 735, 740-41 (1996) (citing Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v.

Berotti v. West

11 Vet. App. 194 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 2, 1998

Travelstead v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 344, 346 (1991) (citing 38 U.S.C. § 3732 (a)), aff'd 978 F.2d 1244 (Fed.Cir.1992); see also Buzinski v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 360, 364 (1994). … See Gilbert v. Derwinski 1 Vet.App. 61 (1991). The February 1996 decision of the Board is AFFIRMED.

Housing Corp. of America v. United States

468 F.2d 922 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 10, 1972

Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380, 384 (1947); National Bank of N. America v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 948 , 456 F. 2d 754 (1972) ; California-Pac. Util. Co. v. United States, 194 Ct. Cl. 703 (1971); Fountain v. … Corp. v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 503 (1967).

Johnson v. District of Columbia

49 Ct. Cl. 8 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 17, 1913

Farrar v. Bernheim, 75 Fed., 136 ; Jeffrey v. Brown, 29 Fed., 476 ; Equity Rule, United States Supreme Court, 83. … In Bridges v.

12-01 583

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2015

See 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.40, 4.45, 4.59 (2014); DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202, 204-7 (1995). … Mitchell v. Shinseki, 25 Vet. App. 32 (2011); DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202 (1995); see also Johnston v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 80, 84-5 (1997); 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 (2014).

Capital Theatre Co. v. Commissioner

8 B.T.A. 287 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 22, 1927

CAPITOL THEATRE CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Capital Theatre Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 6224. … Howard, Brown Wimberly, E. W. Gould, and L. A.

08-02 111

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 29, 2016

Manning v. Principi, 16 Vet. App. 534, 542-43 (2002). In such claims where the law is dispositive, the claim must be denied due to a lack of legal merit. Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 426, 430 (1994). … The Board is sympathetic to the Veteran's situation; however, the Board is bound by the law and is without authority to grant benefits on an equitable basis. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 503, 7104; Harvey v. Brown, 6 Vet.

Reilly v. United States

93 Fed. Cl. 643 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 9, 2010

Plaintiff could not pursue promotion through the FY04 and FY05 Selection Boards while still being considered by the FY03 Board. … See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997); Michienzi v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 484, 492 (1975); Austin, 206 Ct.Cl. at 723 .

Horner v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

35 Fed. Cl. 23 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 9, 1996

V 1993) (the “Vaccine Act” or the “Act”). … Hor-ner and Nurse Brown testified at the hearing, and Nurse Brown provided a handwriting sample. Neither Mrs. Homer nor Nurse Brown claimed to have written “DPT” on the receipt.

Sanders v. United States

594 F.2d 804 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 21, 1979

The broad impact of correction board action was described in Denton v. United States, 204 Ct. … Healthy City Board of Ed. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977), and job discrimination in Day v. Mathews, 530 F.2d 1083, 1085 (D.C.Cir. 1976), plaintiff would have been treated in the same way.