Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.55s

  • Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Commissioner

    32 B.T.A. 249 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 20, 1935

    CHICAGO TITLE & TRUST COMPANY, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF RHEA LOGAN MUNROE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 73455. … Manistee thereupon issued its draft on Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. in favor of Inverness for $277,653.07. Inverness in turn issued its draft dated March 3, 1931, on Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. to Mrs.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • L. Sandoz Vuille, Inc. v. United States

    22 C.C.P.A. 303 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 29, 1934

    Penick & Ford, Ltd., Inc. v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 218 , T. D. 40228; Brown & Co. et al. v. United States. 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 93 , T. D. 40026 (certiorari denied, 265 U. S. 582 ). … We think our decision herein is controlled in principle by our decision in the case of Brown & Co. et al. v. United States, supra. The merchandise there involved was imported during the life of the Tariff Act of 1913.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ah Pah Redwood Co. v. Commissioner

    26 T.C. 1197 · United States Tax Court · Sep 28, 1956

    See sec. 1796, supra; Brown, Personal Property sec. 164 (2d ed.). … McGinn v. Willey, 24 Cal. App. 303 , 141 Pac. 49 ; cf. Forbes v. City of Los Angeles, 101 Cal. App. 781 , 282 Pac. 528 ; 101 A. L. R. 923; see sec. 1724, supra.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Zacharin v. United States

    34 Fed. Cl. 609 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 3, 1996

    Nasem v. Brown, 595 F.2d 801, 807 (D.C.Cir. 1979). In Nasem , however, the D.C. … Brown v. Financial Serv. Corp., Int’l, 489 F.2d 144, 149 (5th Cir.1974) (holding that the trial court erred when it failed to include a cover letter as part of the parties’ stock purchase agreement). b.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • S. WONG

    28 I. & N. Dec. 518 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Mar 30, 2022

    Lonoff, Assistant Chief Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: HUNSUCKER and PETTY, Appellate Immigration Judges; BROWN, Temporary Appellate Immigration Judge. … Educ. & Rsch. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Whiteley v. Principi

    15 Vet. App. 219 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 6, 2001

    Supreme Court in the pending (as of the date of that motion) case of Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. W. Virginia Dep't of Health and Human Res., 121 S.Ct. 1835 (2001). … See generally McNaron v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 61, 63 (1997); see also Hudson v. West, 13 Vet.App. 470, 473 (2000) (Steinberg, J., concurring), vacated on other grounds sub nom. Hudson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • VALENZUELA GALLARDO

    27 I. & N. Dec. 449 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2018

    United States v. Brown, 33 F.3d 1002, 1004 (8th Cir. 1994) (emphasis added) (citation omitted); see also United States v. … Brown, 543 S.W.3d 647, 649–50 & n.8 (Mo. Ct.

    Vacated by Agustin Valenzuela Gallardo v. William Barr, 968 F.3d 1053 (2020)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • 09-14 183

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 29, 2016

    See Brock v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 155, 162-64 (1997); Combee, 34 F. 3d at 1044. The Board must determine the value of all evidence submitted, including lay and medical evidence. Buchanan v. … Routen v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 183 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cyril Oram v. Department of the Navy

    2022 MSPB 30 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 31, 2022

    See Davis v. … Finally, although the Board in Phillips v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Melson v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 6, 2017

    correction board enters a final decision denying relief.” … Wells v. United States, 420 F.3d 1343, 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (quoting Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1997)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pitzman's Co. v. Commissioner

    21 B.T.A. 1368 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 27, 1931

    OF SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Pitzman's Co. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 21745, 39299. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered pursuant to Rule 50. MORRIS, LANSDON, STERNHAGEN, ARUNDELL, MURDOCK, and MATTHEWS dissent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bearingpoint, Inc. v. United States

    77 Fed. Cl. 189 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 30, 2007

    Browning Ferris Indus., Inc. and Subsidiaries v. United States, 75 Fed.Cl. 591, 594 (2007) (citing Reynolds, 846 F.2d at 748 ). The underlying facts relevant to Plaintiffs motion to dismiss are not in dispute. … Accordingly, the Board permitted the default termination of the ordering agency to stand.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • 11-00 291

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2015

    See 38 C.F.R. § 4.71a; DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202 (1995). … See Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337 (1996); Shipwash v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 218, 227 (1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Vensure Hr, Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 15, 2023

    In Brown v. United States, 22 F.4th 1008, 1012 (Fed. … Brown v. United States, 151 Fed. Cl. 530, 533-34 (2020) (citing Waltner v. United States, 679 F.3d 1329, 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2012)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Monjar v. Commissioner

    13 T.C. 587 · United States Tax Court · Oct 21, 1949

    Reliance is placed in the main upon Hoe & Co. v. Commissioner, 30 Fed. (2d) 630, and Brown v. Commissioner, 54 Fed. (2d) 563. … The Hoe case and Brown case, supra, also Ernest Strong, 7 T. C. 953 , do not, in our view, parallel the situation here.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • C. F. Mueller Co. v. Commissioner

    40 B.T.A. 195 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 30, 1939

    Spring City Co. v. Commissioner, 292 U.S. 182 ; *897 Commissioner v. Darnell, Inc., 60 Fed.(2d) 82 ; H. H. Brown Co., 8 B.T.A. 112 ; Owen-Ames-Kimball Co., 5 B.T.A. 921 . … Lucas v. American Code Co., 280 U.S. 445 , 449 ; Weiss v. Wiener, 279 U.S. 333 ; William J. Ostheimer, 1 B.T.A. 18 ; Yost Auto Co., 26 B.T.A. 685 . Cf. Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • McAlester Colliery Co. v. Commissioner

    17 B.T.A. 153 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 27, 1929

    MCALESTER COLLIERY CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. McAlester Colliery Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 27861. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 17 B.T.A. 153 ; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2344 ; August 27, 1929 , Promulgated *2344 The petitioner and the Interstate Coal Co. were no affiliated during the taxable year. L. W.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Paul v. Commissioner

    16 B.T.A. 459 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 10, 1929

    BLAIR, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Paul v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 25978, 36662. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 16 B.T.A. 459 ; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2577 ; May 10, 1929 , Promulgated *2577 The decedent, majority stockholder in a bank, guaranteed stockholders and depositors against loss due to loans made

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • 10-47 072

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 30, 2015

    This matter comes to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a February 2010 decision of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO). … Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • T. A. Loving & Co. v. United States

    132 F. Supp. 250 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1955

    The claim was denied by the contracting officer and by the Army Board of Contract Appeals of the Corps of Engineers acting for the Secretary of the Army. … Brown, that cinder blocks were being used where finish schedule No. 50 on the key sheet called for “Struc. Unglazed Units.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.