Case law

In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

178 F. Supp. 3d 1377 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Apr 11, 2016

Browning for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. SCHEDULE A MDL No. 2695 — IN RE: SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION Northern District of California BRATTAIN v. … No. 4:15-04705 Southern District of Florida SPROULE v. SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 0:15-62064 District of New Mexico DUNN v. SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., C.A.

University Hill Foundation v. Commissioner

51 T.C. 548 · United States Tax Court · Jan 8, 1969

The leading case is Commissioner v. Clay Brown, 380 U.S. 568 (1965). … Kinsey, “Bootstraps and Capital Gain — A Participant’s View of Commissioner v. Brown,” 64 Mich. L. Rev. 581 (1966). Nieharot, “Objective: Tax Avoidance; Clay Brown and The Three Party Sale and Leaseback,” 2 Vill. L.

Mumper v. Commissioner

13 B.T.A. 977 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 12, 1928

HEWLINGS MUMPER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Mumper v. Commissioner Docket No. 14053. … Brown, Esq., for the respondent. MILLIKEN *977 This proceeding is for a redetermination of a deficiency in income tax in the amount of $1,291.95 for the year 1921.

Chandler v. States

47 Fed. Cl. 106 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 22, 2000

Because resort to a corrections board is a permissive remedy, a board decision is not an event necessary to bring a cause of action against the United States. Cunningham v. … See Keene Corporation v. United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997), reh’g denied (April 17, 1997); Doe v.

Brekke v. Commissioner

40 T.C. 789 · United States Tax Court · Aug 2, 1963

On June 12,1952, Weiser #2’s board of directors granted Russell and his brother, Frank W. Russell, options to purchase 35 and 5 shares, respectively, of Weiser #2. … . and Royal Farms) combine to give a vastly different color to a set of facts otherwise largely similar to Brown, Anderson, and Royal Farms.

Clark Thread Co. v. Commissioner

28 B.T.A. 1128 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 18, 1933

In Newspaper Printing Co. v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.

Aransas Compress Co. v. Commissioner

8 B.T.A. 155 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 22, 1927

ARANSAS COMPRESS CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Aransas Compress Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 4378. … Brown, Esq., for the petitioner. George G. Witter, Esq., for the respondent.

ARJAY ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Reagan

707 F. Supp. 1346 · United States Court of International Trade · Feb 21, 1989

See United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 445 , 85 S.Ct. 1707, 1713 , 14 L.Ed. 2d 484 (1965); United States v. … See U.S. v. Brown, supra 381 U.S. at 441, 442 , 85 S.Ct. at 1711-12 . By its very nature, the purpose of a Bill of Attainder is to invoke punishment of and against the party or class of parties named.

Brokertec Holdings, Inc f.k.a. ICAP US Investment Partnership v. Commissioner

2019 T.C. Memo. 32 · United States Tax Court · Apr 9, 2019

Brown Shoe Co., 175 F.2d 305 (8th Cir. 1949), rev’g 10 T.C. 291 (1948), rev’d, 339 U.S. 583 (1950).13 To resolve this split, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Brown Shoe Co. In Brown Shoe Co. v. … Corp. with approval in Brown Shoe Co. v. Commissioner, 339 U.S. at 590. And in Chi., Burlington & Quincy R.

Michel R. Blanding v. United States Postal Service

2014 MSPB 43 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 18, 2014

However, an appellant may waive his Board appeal rights in the process of settling his grievance. See, e.g., Swidecki v. U.S. Postal Service, 101 M.S.P.R. 110 , ¶ 14 (2006); Laity v. … See, e.g., Paula v.

Michel R. Blanding v. United States Postal Service

2014 MSPB 43 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 18, 2014

However, an appellant may waive his Board appeal rights in the process of settling his grievance. See, e.g., Swidecki v. U.S. Postal Service, 101 M.S.P.R. 110 , ¶ 14 (2006); Laity v. … See, e.g., Paula v.

Pere Jarboe v. Department of Health and Human Services

2023 MSPB 22 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 2, 2023

See Canary v. U.S. … a). 2 Lee v.

W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Commissioner

9 B.T.A. 842 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 23, 1927

Brown 5 P. A. … Co. v.

Brown Printing Co. v. Commissioner

16 T.C.M. 164 · United States Tax Court · Feb 28, 1957

Brown Printing Company v. Commissioner. Brown Printing Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 59516. United States Tax Court T.C. Memo 1957-37 ; 1957 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 215 ; 16 T.C.M. (CCH) 164 ; T.C.M. … The lease was executed by the three trustees and Brown Printing Company by "Mrs. Henry C. Crenshaw," who is the same person as Annie D. Crenshaw, who executed the least as one of the trustees.

Schieffelin & Co. v. United States

67 Cust. Ct. 549 · United States Customs Court · Dec 30, 1971

brandy in equivalent size bottles to exclusive distributors in the United States, among others — Hennessy to plaintiff in tenth size bottles packed 24 bottles to a case containing 2.4 gallons (Bras Arme), and Martell to Browne … See and compare Kraft-Phenix Cheese Co. v.

In Re Buesgens Litigation

483 F. Supp. 2d 1357 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Apr 18, 2007

Buesgens v. Charles E. Brown, et al., D. District of Columbia, C.A. No. 1:06-1964. Michael L. Buesgens v. United States of America, et al., W.D. Texas, C.A. No. 1:06-967. No. MDL-1800. … Brown, P.C.; Armbrust & Brown, LLP; Grady, Jewett & McCulley, LLP; Megan Goeres; Debi Wehmeier; Mandy Rogers; and Amanda Wilson-Torres. [4] The request of defendant in the now-dismissed Texas action for attorneys' fees is

Globe Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. United States

55 Fed. Cl. 247 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 11, 2003

See Winstar Corp. v. … Holding Corp. v.

Boland v. Commissioner

41 B.T.A. 930 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 24, 1940

ELDRED BOLAND, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Boland v. Commissioner Docket No. 95157. … Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1 ; 147 Pac. 1168 . Community income earned and received after 1927 must be returned one-half by the husband and one-half by the wife. *1129 United States v. Malcolm, 282 U.S. 792 .

10-47 233

Board of Veterans' Appeals · May 31, 2016

See 38 C.F.R. § 3.321 (b)(1); Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337, 338-39 (1996). … See Buie v. Shinseki, 24 Vet. App. 242, 250 (2011); AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 38 (1993); see also Bradley v. Peake, 22 Vet.

10-11 571

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2015

In February 2012 and February 2013, the Board remanded the claims for further development. In the February 2013 Board remand, the issue of TDIU was added and also remanded for further development in light of Rice v. … Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994).