Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

1.28s

  • Adams v. United States

    156 Ct. Cl. 289 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 7, 1962

    On November 20,1945, plaintiff appeared before a Disposition Board. The Board convened at Waltham Regional Hospital. … Aubrey Kenna Brown, Jr., Medical Corps, United States Army, and Assistant Chief of the Otolaryn- *303 gology Service, Walter Reed Army Hospital, testified that, in Ms opinion, based npon his examination of the medical records

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Drakes Bay Land Company, a Corporation v. The United States

    424 F.2d 574 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1970

    United States v. Reynolds, 397 U.S. 14 , 90 S.Ct. 803 , 25 L.Ed.2d 12 (decided February 24, 1970, slip op. at p. 3); United States v. Miller, 317 U.S. 369 , 63 S.Ct. 276 , 87 L.Ed. 336 (1943). … Defendant cites Halpert v.

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • Mark S. Rasmuson and Brenda S. Rasmuson, Husband and Wife v. United States

    109 Fed. Cl. 267 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 8, 2013

    Hall, 72 N.W. 427 (Iowa 1897) and Brown v. … (citing Brown, 29 N.W. at 941).

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Gifford v. United States

    26 Cl. Ct. 398 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 2, 1992

    Thus, notwithstanding the deference to be given military decisions in our “narrow” review of military discharge cases, Brown v. … The Board’s decision not to expunge it, on the record before it, was a violation of its mandate. Muse v. United States, 21 Cl.Ct. 592, 603 (1990), citing Yee v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Doyle v. United States

    599 F.2d 984 · United States Court of Claims · May 16, 1979

    Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 22, 24 (1967). See, e.g., Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 (1969) (violation of sixth amendment right of confrontation); Brown v. … In Bensing v.

    Modified by Adams v. United States, 609 F.2d 990 (1979)Cited 134 timesPublished
  • Roger L. Haynes v. Railroad Retirement Board

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Oct 8, 2014

    Maddox v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 759 F.2d 9, 10 (Fed. Cir. 1985). … See Panter v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • W. M. Ritter Lumber Co. v. Commissioner

    30 B.T.A. 231 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 31, 1934

    Spreckels v. Brown, 212 U.S. 208, 210 . … Harvey Coal & Coke Co. v. Dillon, 59 W.Va. 605 ; 53 S.E. 928 ; Tootham v. Courtney, 62 W.Va. 167 ; 58 S.E. 915 ; Brown v. Gray, 68 W.Va. 555 ; 70 S.E. 276 ; Wilson v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Depew v. Commissioner

    27 B.T.A. 515 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 6, 1933

    GANSON DEPEW, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Depew v. Commissioner Docket No. 50860. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 27 B.T.A. 515 ; 1933 BTA LEXIS 1352 ; January 6, 1933 , Promulgated *1352 Held, that the transaction relating to the sale of petitioner's stock was consummated in the year 1926 and loss

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 29, 2022

    Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2013). … Kellogg Brown & Root, 728 F.3d at 1360 (quoting Gen. Dynamics Corp. v. United States, 410 F.2d 404, 409 (Ct. Cl. 1969)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harold K Gause v. Railroad Retirement Board

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 20, 2024

    Anderson v. U.S. … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), within 30 calendar days after you receive this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2); see Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 582 U.S. 420 (2017).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Averill v. Commissioner

    37 B.T.A. 485 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 17, 1938

    A. 21; Lilienthal v. Commissioner (C. C. A., 9th Cir.), 80 Fed. (2d) 411; Helvering v. Watts, supra; Helvering v. Leary, supra. … This question has already been determined against the taxpayers’ contention in a number of Board cases. In Ernest Brown, 36 B. T.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Beres v. United States

    92 Fed. Cl. 737 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 12, 2010

    Plaintiffs assert that because the Brown factors rely on subjective evaluations, the decision in Brown v. … Id. at 21 n. 5 (quoting Brown v. State, 924 P.2d at 911 ).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • B. Hayman Co. v. Commissioner

    25 B.T.A. 736 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 29, 1932

    Primrose Tapestry Co., supra; Clark Brown Grain Co., 18 B. T. A. 937; Wright Lumber Co., 17 B. T. A. 814. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50. YaN Foss AN dissents.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ricks v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 6, 2022

    Ricks filed a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Louis Ricks et al. v. Railroad Retirement Board, Case No. 19-1229. (DA C at 1–2). … will have been availed of and exhausted, obtain a review of any final decision of the Board by filing a petition for review[.]”); see also Roberts v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ullman v. Commissioner

    29 T.C. 129 · United States Tax Court · Oct 28, 1957

    Justice) Cardozo in In re Brown, 242 N. Y. 1, 10 , 150 N. E. 581, 584 . This, in fact, is what petitioners did in the present case. … Here, however, the goodwill and customers were the property of the corporation and not of petitioners, Burnet v. Commonwealth, Imp. Co., 287 U. S. 415 ; Klein v. Board of Supervisors, 282 U.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States

    25 C.C.P.A. 415 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 7, 1938

    United States v. Brown & Roese, 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 382 , T. D. 35922; Constance v. United States, supra; Brown & Co. et al. v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 93 , T. D. 40026; Scaramelli v. United States, 12 Ct. … D. 40056; United States v. Neuman & Schwiers Co., 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 207 , T. D. 40224; Penick & Ford (Ltd., Inc.) v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 218 , T. D. 40228; United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vitelli v. United States

    7 Ct. Cust. 243 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 29, 1916

    United States v. Hill ( 120 U. S., 169, 182 ); United States v. Philbrick ( 120 U. S., 52, 59 ); Brown v. United States ( 113 U. S., 568, 571 ).” Robertson v. Downing ( 127 U. … Robertson v. Downing ( 127 U. S., 607 ); Brown v. United States ( 113 U. S., 568, 571 ); United States v. Philbrick ( 120 U.

    Reversed on other grounds by F. Vitelli & Son v. United States, 250 U.S. 355 (1919)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Cottrell v. United States

    42 Fed. Cl. 144 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 16, 1998

    See United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 588 , 61 S.Ct. 767 , 85 L.Ed. 1058 (1941); Brown, 105 F.3d at 624 ; Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (Ct.Cl.1979). … See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (Ct.Cl.1979); Pinkston v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 263, 267 (1984); see also McCauley v.

    Cited 107 timesPublished
  • Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States

    176 Ct. Cl. 1265 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1966

    Great Northern Ry. v. United States, 170 Ct. Cl. 188 (1965). … United States v. Gulf Refining Co., 268 U.S. 542, 546 (1925) ; Union Pac. R.R. v. United States, supra; Motor Cargo, Inc. v. United States, 129 Ct. Cl. 493, 495 , 124 F. Supp. 370, 371 (1954).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Mauldin v. Commissioner

    16 T.C. 698 · United States Tax Court · Mar 30, 1951

    Snyder v. Commissioner, 295 U. S. 134 ; Oliver v. Commissioner, 138 Fed. (2d) 910; Ignaz Schwinn, 9 B. T. A. 1304, 1308. … See and compare Snyder v. Commissioner, supra; Brown v. Commissioner, 143 Fed. (2d) 468; Snell v. Commissioner, 97 Fed. (2d) 891; Oliver v. Commissioner, supra; Gruver v. Commissioner, 142 Fed. (2d) 363, affirming 1 T.

    Cited 78 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.