Case law

CALCANO DE MILLAN

26 I. & N. Dec. 904 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2017

Schmalz, Deputy Chief BEFORE: Board Panel: ADKINS-BLANCH, Vice Chairman; GUENDELSBERGER and MANN, Board Members. … Ann. art. 62.001(5) (West 2015); Utah Code Ann. § 77-41-109(2) (West 2016); Doe v. Brown, 99 Cal. Rptr. 3d 209, 210–11 (Cal. Ct.

Watson v. United States

152 Ct. Cl. 273 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1961

Following the said hearing, the board recommended that the plaintiff appear before another Physical Evaluation Board. 17. … The case of Morris Brown v. United States, C. Cls.

ASFA International Construction Industry and Trade, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Sep 2, 2014

Timely submission of a claim is a prerequisite for the Board to exercise jurisdiction under the CDA. Arctic Slope Native Ass 'n v. Sebelius, 583 F.3d 785, 793 (Fed. … Gray Personnel, 06-2 BCA ~ 33,378 at 165,476-77 (citing Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Development Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1997)).

Alpirn v. United States

113 F. Supp. 681 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1953

United States v. Felin, 334 U. S. 624 . … Commodity Trading Corp. v. United States, 339 U. S. 121 ; Swiss Federal Railways v. United States, 125 C. Cls. 444 .

Brown v. Commissioner

71 T.C.M. 3197 · United States Tax Court · Jun 19, 1996

Boehm v. Commissioner, 326 U.S. 287, 292- 293 (1945); Ramsay Scarlett & Co. v. Commissioner, supra at 811. … Wood v. United States, 863 F.2d 417, 421 (5th Cir. 1989); Holmes Enters., Inc. v. Commissioner, 69 T.C. 114, 117 (1977); Holt v. Commissioner, 69 T.C. 75, 79-80 (1977), affd. 611 F.2d 1160 (5th Cir. 1980).

Cook v. Commissioner

38 B.T.A. 651 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 29, 1938

Brown, 36 B. T. A. 178; dismissed, C. C. A., 2d Cir.; see also United Slates v. Fairbanks, 95 Fed. (2d) 794; Felin v. Kyle, 22 Fed. Supp. 556; George A. Hellman, 33 B. T. A. 901; Francis M. Averill, 37 B. T. A. 485. Cf. … White v. United States, 21 Fed. Supp. 361; Mary S. Childs, 35 B. T.

Dodge v. Commissioner

13 B.T.A. 201 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 3, 1928

These issues have been decided by this Board in the cases of James Co uzens, supra, and Rosetta V. … Abbott, 50 Mich. 278 ; Hugh v. Dowd, 86 Mich. 412 ; Draper v. Brown, 153 Mich. 120 , and that the consent executed by Bloomer is invalid and of no force and effect. This argument, however, presents no difficulty here.

A4 Construction Company, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Apr 29, 2024

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2013). … V.

Brown v. Commissioner

72 T.C.M. 59 · United States Tax Court · Jul 10, 1996

BROWN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 20832-95. Filed July 10, 1996. Kathleen A. Brown, pro se. T. … In Meneguzzo v.

Kosmo v. United States

72 Fed. Cl. 46 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 25, 2006

See Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1457 (Fed.Cir.1997); Wells v. United States, 420 F.3d 1343, 1345-46 (Fed.Cir.2005). … Richey v.

In re Forcefield Energy, Inc.

154 F. Supp. 3d 1351 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Oct 13, 2015

SCHEDULE A MDL No. 2655 — IN RE: FORCE-FIELD ENERGY, INC., SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION Eastern District of New York Brown v. Forcefield Energy, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:15-02782 Su v. St. Julien, et al., C.A. … No. 1:15-03020 Miller v. Forcefield Energy, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:15-03141 Rosales, et al. v. Forcefield Energy, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:15-03279 .

Pardee v. Commissioner

49 T.C. 140 · United States Tax Court · Dec 1, 1967

See Frances Carroll Brown, 30 T.C. 831, 835-836 (1958). The reasons for including such a clause are obvious. … See Fawcus Machine Co. v. United States, 282 U.S. 375 (1931); H. H. Brown Co., 8 B.T.A. 112 (1927). The Board’s decision in Seagrist was based on Charles B. Shelton, et al., 3 B.T.A. 809 (1926); Roy J.

Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. v. United States

35 Ct. Cl. 110 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 15, 1900

Justice Brown elucidates the different meanings which maybe given to the word iimaterials,” and he points out that logs are manufactured into boards and boards are fashioned into boxes; that the steel spring of a watch is … In the case of the United States v. Allen ( 163 U. S.

Alexandra M. Jackson v. Denis McDonough

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 25, 2024

v. … Co. v.

BAE Systems San Francisco Ship Repair

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 19, 2014

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2013) ("It seems that KBR seeks a presumption that it is entitled to reimbursement simply because it incurred facilities costs. … Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States, 742 F.3d 967, 970 (Fed.

Black v. United States

24 Cl. Ct. 461 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 13, 1991

Nixon v. … See also Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v.

Burtt v. United States

176 Ct. Cl. 310 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 10, 1966

McArthur v. United States, 29 Ct. Cl. 191 (1894) ; Hill v. United States, 149 U.S. 593, 598 (1893). The distinction is clearly defined in Bigby v. … Brown. On May 27 and 28, plaintiff underwent psychiatric examination by Dr. Brown and members of his staff.

Condor Operating Co. v. Sawhill

514 F.2d 351 · Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1975

Little, 339 U.S. 1 , 4 n.1, 70 S.Ct. 468 , 94 L.Ed. 599 (1950), supra ; In re Brown, 439 F.2d 47 (3d Cir. 1971); Board of Managers of Ark. Tr. Sch. for Boys v. … Block v. Hirsh, 256 U.S. 135 [ 41 S.Ct. 458 , 65 L.Ed. 865 ]; Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. Feldman, 256 U.S. 170 [ 41 S.Ct. 465 , 65 L.Ed. 877 ]; . . .”

Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States

47 Cust. Ct. 251 · United States Customs Court · Jul 11, 1961

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v.

United States v. Bamberger

28 Cust. Ct. 542 · United States Customs Court · Feb 5, 1952

2, reveals that whatever the effect of the prices set by the Canadian Wartime Prices and Trade Board, the manufacturer and exporter fixed not only the prices at which it would sell to wholesalers, but also the prices at … Upon the authority of United States v. Graham & Zenger, Inc., 31 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 131, C. A.