Case law

Vicky M. Quinn v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 11, 2019

See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 27 (1948) ("No rule of construction necessitates our acceptance of an interpretation resulting in patently absurd consequences."); Atencio v. … Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet.App. 369, 372-73 (1999) (per curiam order); see also Clark v. O'Rourke, 30 Vet.App. 92, 97 (2018). The Board must consider any such additional evidence or argument submitted. Kay v.

Fuller Brush Co. v. Commissioner

8 B.T.A. 855 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 17, 1927

FULLER BRUSH CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Fuller Brush Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 10487. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 8 B.T.A. 855 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 2792 ; October 17, 1927 , Promulgated *2792 Warren M. Brown, C.P.A., for the petitioner. J. W. Fisher, Esq., for the respondent.

Price v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 23, 2015

Yuval Shafrir is board certified in neurology with a special qualification in child neurology. Tr. at 57. He is also board certified in clinical neurophysiology. Id. … Kannankeril v. Terminix, 128 F.3d 802, 807-08 (3d Cir. 1997); see also Hocraffer v. Sec’y of HHS, 63 Fed.

Badger Lumber Co. v. Commissioner

29 B.T.A. 363 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 21, 1933

Richter & Co. v. Light Co., 116 Atl. 600 ; Cogswell v. Second Nat. Bank, 60 Atl. 1059 ; Second Church v. Church of Colegrove, 74 Conn. 79 ; Miller v. Andrews, 142 N.E. 67 . … Douglas v. Edwards, 298 Fed. 229 .

Robert J. Kiddey v. James B. Peake

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 16, 2008

On October 23, 2006, this Court affirmed, in part, and reversed, in part, a December 17, 2003, Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) decision. See Kiddey v. Nicholson, No. 04-452, 2006 WL 300131 (Vet. App. Oct. 23, 2006). … Cir. 2007); see also Bowers v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 25, 27 (1995) (holding that Court order granting consensual motion for remand pursuant to U.S. VET . APP .

Philips Lighting North American Corporation

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 11, 2021

See Dixon v. Shinseki, 741 F.3d 1367, 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2014). The moving party must show a compelling reason why the Board should modify its decision. … V.

Kutz v. United States

132 F. Supp. 117 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1955

That the steamships “Malden” Captain Brown, “Bussun” Captain Brewer and “F. P. Jones” Captain Dodge, hove in sight later and rescued the men in the water and transported them to New York. 20. … On March 22, 1950, the Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals advised the Secretary of the Navy as follows: The Board has reconsidered the case of Lieutenant Commander Frank Gunnell Kutz, U.S.

R. C. A. Victor Div. Radio Corp. of America v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 154 · United States Customs Court · Apr 5, 1951

In the case of William Meyer & Co. v. United States, T. D. 12788, G. … Passaic Worsted Co. et al. v. United States, 17 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 459, T. D. 43916; United States v. Sheep Shearers Mdse. & Comm. Co., 23 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 146, T. D. 48009; Edward Brenner v.

Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. v. FirstHealth of the Carolinas, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Dec 2, 2002

° Id. at 1089 (quoting Markman, 52 F.3d at 980, and Brown v. Piper, 91 U.S. 37, 23 L. Ed. 200 (1875)). … ™ Markman, 52 F.3d at 980 (quoting Brown v. Piper, 91 U.S. 37, 23 L. Ed. 200 (1875)). 25 Reynolds Letter at 1.

Gudeon v. Commissioner

32 B.T.A. 100 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 19, 1935

A. 578; affd., in part sub nom Pope v. Commissioner, 39 Fed. (2d) 420; Benedict v. Price, 38 Fed. (2d) 309; and Arthur G. Hilmer, 27 B. T. A. 1165. … James Brown, 10 B. T. A. 1036. See also La Monte & Sons v. Commissioner, 32 Fed. (2d) 220; Louis C. Rollo, 20 B. T. A. 199.

Application of Esso Standard Oil Company

305 F.2d 495 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 2, 1962

Browne, Mead, Browne, Schuyler & Beveridge, Washington, D. C. (William E. Schuyler, Jr., and Andrew B. Beveridge, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant. Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D. C. (George C. … The case of Burgess Battery Co. v.

Hollymatic Corporation

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 22, 2021

WILSON Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Vice Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals … Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Chugach Federal Solutions, Inc

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Oct 2, 2024

Brown, Esq. Lisa A. Markman, Esq. … Co. v. United States, 112 F.3d 1569, 1574 (quoting Horowitz v. United States, 267 U.S. 458, 461 (1925)); see also Klamath Irrigation Dist. v.

Romann v. Commissioner

111 T.C. 273 · United States Tax Court · Nov 4, 1998

When the petition for declaratory judgment was filed, the address of the Board of Trustees of the MEBA Pension Trust, hereinafter sometimes referred to as the Board, was in Baltimore, Maryland. … See Newborn v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 610, 636-637 (1990). Petitioner also asserts that the Supreme Court’s decision in Robinson v.

East Asiatic Co.—New York Agency Inc. v. United States

10 Ct. Cust. 207 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 23, 1920

Martin, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: The merchandise consists of 150 cases of a fine, light-brown powder which was imported into this country by the appellants from China. … In saying this we do not overlook the statement of the board to that effect in the present case, nor that of the court in the case of Procter & Co. v. United States ( 139 Fed., 586 ; affd. 145 Fed., 126 ).

Wanamaker Trustees v. Commissioner

11 T.C. 365 · United States Tax Court · Sep 27, 1948

Following Mead Corporation v. … The amounts in question must accordingly be regarded as having been in effect paid to Mary Brown Warburton and Rodman Wanamaker II, and in turn paid over by them to petitioners. Bergan v. Commissioner (C. C.

Bateman v. Commissioner

43 B.T.A. 69 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 11, 1940

Vinton v. Pratt, 228 Mass. 468 ; 117 N. E. 919 ; Shattuck v. Burrage, 229 Mass. 448 ; 118 N. E. 889 . Cf. Crawford v. Langmaid, 171 Mass. 309 ; 50 N. E. 606 . … Williams v. Inhabitants of Milton, 215 Mass. 1 ; 102 N. E. 355 ; Chase v. Union National Bank of Lowell, 275 Mass. 503 ; 176 N. E. 508 .

Arthur L. Hairston v. Denis McDonough

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 20, 2023

Johnson v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 369, 373 (1996). 7 And VA originally implemented the statutory text more or less verbatim in § 3.274. See 44 Fed. … CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the June 17, 2020, Board decision is AFFIRMED. See Carbino v. West, 168 F.3d 32, 34–35 (Fed. Cir. 1999). 11

Restoration Specialists, LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Nov 14, 2023

Triple Canopy, Inc. v. Sec’y of the Air Force, 14 F.4th 1332, 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2021) (quoting Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. Murphy, 823 F.3d 622, 626 (Fed. Cir. 2016)); Elec. Boat Corp. v. … Brown Park Ests.–Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1997).

McGugan v. Commissioner

47 B.T.A. 658 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 10, 1942

We do not construe Fletcher v. … See In re Skillman's Estate, 146 Iowa 601 ; 125 N.W. 343 ; Brown v. Brown, 199 N.C. 473 ; 154 S.E. 731 .