Case law

Aetna Explosives Co. v. United States

9 Ct. Cust. 298 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 30, 1919

This claim of the importer was overruled by the decision of the board, General Appraiser Brown dissenting. The case is brought here for review in the regular way. … See Church of Holy Trinity v. United States ( 143 U. S. 457, 459 ); Heide v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 399, 403 ; T.

John A. Nelson Co. v. Commissioner

24 B.T.A. 1031 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 30, 1931

Those once determined by the Board, the “ redetermination ” *1037 of the deficiency and the settlement follow under Rule 50 of the Board’s rules of practice, which rule, among other things, is intended to and does provide … Brown, 14 B. T. A. 609; Wallace Huntington, 15 B. T. A. 851; M. A. Milan, 16 B. T. A. 1112; Charles F. Meagher, 20 B. T. A. 68; Lucius H. Elmer, 22 B. T. A. 224; and Virginia Beach Golf Course Annex Corporation, 23 B.

Mortsell v. Laurila

301 F.2d 947 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 4, 1962

The Laurila application was forwarded to the Patent Office on May 19, 1954, and filed on May 20, 1954 6 We do not attempt to distinguish the instant case from that of Brown, Jr. v. … See Levy v.

Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United States

24 Cust. Ct. 24 · United States Customs Court · Jan 13, 1950

(United States v. Rotberg & Krieger, supra; United States v. Arnhold & Co. (dogskins), supra; United States v. Winograd Bros. (goatskins), supra.) … In some of the earlier decisions of the Board of General Appraisers some reference was made to plates, holding them not to be manufactures of fur. The Board of General Appraisers, in T.

Kandahar Mahali Transit & Forwarding LTD.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Feb 13, 2024

Electric Boat Corp. v. Sec’y of Navy, 958 F.3d 1372, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2020) (citing Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. Murphy, 823 F.3d 622, 626 (Fed. Cir. 2016)). … Lockhart v. United States, 577 U.S. 347, 351-52 (2016).

Walker Goulard Plehn Co. v. United States

6 Cust. Ct. 11 · United States Customs Court · Jan 6, 1941

Some of these treatments grease proof the paper for commercial purposes, but the board itself is not grease proofed, and such board is not classified in the bracket of grease proof papers, although it will almost entirely … Note Auffmordt & Co. v. United States, T. D. 47792 ( 68 Treas.

Arab Shah Construction Company

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Feb 12, 2019

In ruling on such a motion, we "must accept well-pleaded factual allegations as true and must draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the claimant," Kellogg Brown & Root Sen1ices, Inc. v. … Board's Charter.

GREEN v. COMMISSIONER

3 T.C. 74 · United States Tax Court · Jan 19, 1944

In Scripps v. Commissioner (C. C. … Brown, 1 T. C. 225 ; and Jones v. Hassett, 45 Fed. Supp. 195.

Warren B. Cook v. Robert D. Snyder

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 31, 2017

Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119, 123 (1993) (emphasis added). … Gardner v. Brown, 5 F.3d 1456, 4363 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Prior to 1988, a veteran whose claim was rejected by the Board was generally unable to obtain further review. Henderson, 562 U.S. at 432.

United States v. Bright

19 C.C.P.A. 295 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 25, 1932

Brown & Co. et al. v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 93 , T. D. 40026. No brief was filed by the appellee, and the Government does not deny the correctness of this proposition. This court, in Klein, Messner Co. v. … The court held that there was no valid rule of the Board of General Appraisers in force -and applicable to such a petition then being considered, inasmuch as this court, in Klein, Messner Co. v.

In Re Westec Corporation

307 F. Supp. 559 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Dec 18, 1969

Hutton & Co., Inc. v. John D. Brown Civil Action No. 68-H-592 18. Donald McGregor & Tupper Lake Corp. v. James W. Williams, et al. Civil Action No. 67-H-654 19. Wyndham Associates, et al. v. David C. … Williams, former Chairman of the Board of Westec, are defendants in the trustee action and most of the other actions involved in this litigation. Both were convicted of criminal charges related to this matter. 4 .

Joan Nailos v. Denis McDonough

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 10, 2021

Petitti v. McDonald, 27 Vet.App. 415, 422 (2015). "[I]f the meaning of the regulation is clear from its language, then that is 'the end of the matter.'" Tropf v. Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 317, 320 (2006) (quoting Brown v. … Claimants are presumed to be seeking the maximum benefits, see AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35 (1993), but that presumption is overcome by the widow merely checking the wrong box on a DIC application.

Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Cost of Living Council as Successor to the Pay Board

497 F.2d 1360 · Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · May 15, 1974

This case is governed by our decision in Plumbers Local Union No. 519 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO v. … See United States v. Lieb, 462 F.2d 1161 (Em.App.1972); University of Southern California v. Cost of Living Council, 472 F.2d 1065 (Em.App.1972).” 479 F.2d at 1056 . The judgment of the district court is affirmed. .

Hoar

578 F.2d 1388 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 27, 1978

Hoar, et al. v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc., Civil No. 72-1294-ALS, S.D. Calif. … Brown v. United States, 175 Ct.

Public Warehousing Company, K.S.C.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 7, 2017

for the Federal Circuit 1 Among other things, PWC faults us for not addressing its citations to three earlier Board opinions: Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., ASBCA Nos. 57530, 58161, 16-1BCAii36,449 … Cir. 1984) and that it only possesses jurisdiction if the Board decision is final. Orlando Helicopter Airways, Inc. v. Widnall, 51 F .3d 258, 260 (Fed. Cir. 1995).

Hill v. Commissioner

25 B.T.A. 362 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 25, 1932

GORDON HILL, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. NEIL E. LARKIN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. FRANK A. MACHUGH, PETITIONER, v. … Larkin, Esq., and Fred Brown, Esq., for the petitioners. John D. Kiley, Esq., for the respondent. LANSDON *362 OPINION.

Bon Ami Co. v. Commissioner

39 B.T.A. 825 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 25, 1939

Brown, 1 B. T. A. 446; Mead Cycle Co., 10 B. T. A. 887. Obviously, subsection (a), standing alone, would not allow the present taxpayer any credit, since this petitioner did not pay the taxes to the foreign country. … Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co., 285 U. S. 1 .

Charles P. Limbert Co. v. Commissioner

9 B.T.A. 1390 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 18, 1928

In the decision of the case of La Belle Iron Works v. United States, 250 U. S. 377, Mr. … Brown, et al., 6 B. T. A. 895. Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Rule 50. MáRQuette, Smith, and Aeundell dissent.

Vincent Schickler, TMD U.S.A., Inc. v. United States

54 Fed. Cl. 264 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 24, 2002

Brown v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 31, 41 (1983), aff'd, 741 F.2d 1374 (Fed.Cir.1984). … Brown, 3 Cl.Ct. at 41 .

Greenhill v. United States

96 Fed. Cl. 771 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 31, 2011

Webb v. … Sorich v. Shalala, 838 F.Supp. 1354 , 1360 n. 9 (D.Neb.1993); accord Cook v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 226, 238 (1994).