Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

1.68s

  • Morris v. Commissioner

    70 T.C. 959 · United States Tax Court · Sep 18, 1978

    Brown .1,000 Harold S. Yang .1,000 Steven J. MacArthur .1,000 John P. … United States v. Cartwright, 411 U.S. 546 (1973); Joseph Weidenhoff, Inc. v. Commissioner, 32 T.C. 1222 (1959); Parker Oil Co. v. Commissioner, 58 T.C. 985 (1972); Davis v. United States, 460 F.2d 769 (9th Cir. 1972).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Deloach v. West

    12 Vet. App. 490 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 15, 1999

    Brown, 8 Vet.App. 202 (1995), with respect to the issue of pain, and (3) VA’s failure to review the veteran's claim file to fully understand the nature of his disabilities. … In its decision, the Board noted that the veteran had raised the issue of clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in a September 1989 Board decision.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Linda Brown v. Office of Personnel Management

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Apr 25, 2024

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD LINDA BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, CH-831M-22-0164-I-1 v … See Pridgen v. Office of Management and Budget , 2022 MSPB 31, ¶ 34 n. 10; Banks v. Department of the Air Force, 4 M.S.P.R. 268, 271 (1980).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Madison Park Corporation v. Bowles

    140 F.2d 316 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1943

    Brown, Em.App., August 5, 1943, 137 F.2d 360 ; Spaeth v. Brown, Em.App., August 4, 1943, 137 F.2d 669 ; Lincoln Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. Brown, Em.App., May 7, 1943, 137 F.2d 228 . [3] Spaeth v. … Brown, Em.App., August 27, 1943, 137 F. 2d 809 ; Spaeth v. Brown, Em.App., August 4, 1943, 137 F.2d 669 ; Lakemore Company v. Brown, Em.App., July 15, 1943, 137 F.2d 355 ; Taylor v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Flippin Materials Company, a Joint Venture Composed of Brown and Root, Inc., a Corporation v. The United States

    312 F.2d 408 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1963

    Co. v. Roosth, 306 F.2d 110, 112-114 (C.A.5, 1962). It makes no difference that in this instance the Claims and Appeals Board held for the contractor, while it rejected the claim in the companion case. … A holding of a contract appeals board which is erroneous in law has no binding effect.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Derrick Brown v. United States Postal Service

    Merit Systems Protection Board · May 6, 2024

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD DERRICK BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, AT-0752-21-0190-I-1 … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Gregory Brown v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    Merit Systems Protection Board · May 2, 2024

    BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, DA-0714-21-0218-I-1 v. … Brown v. Department of Veterans Affairs, MSPB Docket No. DA-0752-19-0402-I-1, Initial Appeal File, Tab 1, Tab 6 at 9.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Yang v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 8, 2020

    With him on the briefs were Erin Brown Jones, Holly K. Victorson, and Diane E. Ghrist, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, D.C., and Samantha R. Jackson, Latham & Watkins LLP, Chicago, IL. … Alford v. United States, 127 Fed. Cl. 345, 352 (2016) (citing Walls v. United States, 582 F.3d 1358, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2009), Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion, 470 U.S. 729, 744 (1985), and 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(2)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The Merit Systems Protection Board's Authority to Adjudicate Constitutional Questions within an Administrative Proceeding

    Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · Sep 26, 2025

    Cir. 1987) (explaining “OPM has been given a statutory right to seek judicial review of any final order or decision of the board” following a determination by the Director of OPM); Dir. of OPM v. … DOJ, 14 M.S.P.R. 403, 406 (1983) (considering a constitutional challenge to a statutory veteran retention preference); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ORDAZ

    26 I. & N. Dec. 637 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2015

    Lee, Assistant Chief Counsel AMICUS CURIAE: Russell Abrutyn, Esquire, Troy, Michigan1 BEFORE: Board Panel: GUENDELSBERGER and MALPHRUS, Board Members; GELLER, Temporary Board Member. … See FDA v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Tamela Brown v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Apr 26, 2024

    BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, AT-3443-19-0500-I-1 v. … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), within 30 calendar days after you receive this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2); see Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 582 U.S. 420 (2017).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Guardian Light Company v. Guardian Electric Manufacturing Co.

    292 F.2d 542 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 14, 1961

    Browne, Mead, Browne, Schuyler & Beveridge, Washington, D. C., Geo. H. Wallace, James B. Kinzer and Wallace, Kinzer & Dorn, Chicago, Ill., for appellant. A. W. Molinare, Chicago, Ill., and Spencer B. … I would therefore reverse the board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Comm'r

    2007 T.C. Summary Opinion 166 · United States Tax Court · Sep 24, 2007

    BROWN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 6412-04S. Filed September 24, 2007. David M. and Phyllis E. Brown, pro sese. Randall L. … Specking v. Commissioner, 117 T.C. 95, 101-102 (2001), affd. sub nom. Haessly v. Commissioner, 68 Fed. Appx. 44 (9th Cir. 2003), affd. sub nom. Umbach v. Commissioner, 357 F.3d 1108 (10th Cir. 2003).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sanders v. United States

    34 Fed. Cl. 75 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 25, 1995

    Gardner v. Brown, 5 F.3d 1456, 1463 (Fed. Cir.1993), affirmed, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 552 , 130 L.Ed.2d 462 (1994). See also 38 U.S.C. § 511 (a); Larrabee v. Derwinski, 968 F.2d 1497 (2nd Cir.1992); Hicks v. … Pursuing the claim through the military corrections boards, the VA, or other appeals boards does not usually toll the statute of limitations, nor, in most cases, does an adverse decision by a board create a new period of

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Gregoline v. United States

    99 Fed. Cl. 161 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 11, 2011

    Reynolds v. Army & Air Force Exch. Serv., 846 F.2d 746, 748 (Fed.Cir.1988) (citing Zunamon v. Brown, 418 F.2d 883, 886 (8th Cir.1969)). … Gregoline’s claims against the California Franchise Tax Board because this Court’s jurisdiction is limited to claims for monetary recovery against the United States. United States v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Stanley Brothers Social Enterprises LLC

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 16, 2020

    Satinine Societa v. P.A.B. … Brown, 119 USPQ2d at 1351 (citing Kellogg Co. and Satinine). B.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wallis

    226 Ct. Cl. 661 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1981

    The Physical Disability Appeals Board concurred with the Personnel Board and found plaintiff to be physically fit. … Brown v. United States, 184 Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Haney v. United States

    676 F.2d 584 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 10, 1982

    In Kalvar Corporation, Inc. v. … In Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v.

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Agee v. United States

    72 Fed. Cl. 284 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 28, 2006

    District Court for the Eastern District of California dated September 18, 2001, Agee v. California Medical Board, No. CIV S-01-1810 GEB GGH PS (E.D.Cal. Aug. 13, 2002) (Order and Findings and Recommendations), Agee v. … State licensing boards and Boards of Medical Examiners can request information in the NPDB. 45 C.F.R. § 60.11 (a)(3).

    Cited 80 timesPublished
  • Shaw v. Levy

    58 F.2d 844 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 6, 1932

    Fox, another of his witnesses, in the Brown Marx Building. Dr. … Any extended discussion is unnecessary, in view of the detailed discussion of the facts by the Board of Appeals.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.