Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.47s

  • Application of Karl Ziegler, Heinz Breil, Erhard Holzkamp and Heinz Martin

    443 F.2d 1211 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 17, 1971

    In re Brown, 406 F.2d 780 , 56 C.C.P.A. 1339 (1969). … Therefore, we affirm the decision of the board. Affirmed. 1 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re A Motion for a Standing Order

    1 Vet. App. 555 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 2, 1990

    [Secretary] and the Board.” Id. … Other courts have at least implicitly agreed, holding that a grand jury subpoena signed by the clerk of the court — which presumably would qualify as judicial “process,” see Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Schock, G. & Co. v. Commissioner

    47 B.T.A. 415 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 4, 1942

    Hann v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 147 Atl. 724 . Applying the test laid down in the oft-cited case of United States v. Anderson, 269 U. … The legislature has the power to discriminate among the various classes of property for the purpose of taxation, State Board of Assessors v. Central R. Co., 48 N. J. Law 146; 4 Atl. 578 ; Chancellor of State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Saks & Co. v. Commissioner

    20 B.T.A. 1151 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 3, 1930

    A. 553 (affd., Aiken v. Commissioner, 35 Fed. (2d) 620), wherein the Board said: We are of opinion that the rule laid down in Joy Moral Oo. v. Commissioner, supra, is applicable here. … Washington Coal & Coke Co. v. Heiner, 42 Fed. (2d) 68; Roy & Titcomb v. United States, 69 Ct. Cls. 614; and Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Commissioner, 38 Fed. (2d) 425. Judgment will be entered under Bule 50.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Comm'r

    2008 T.C. Summary Opinion 121 · United States Tax Court · Sep 16, 2008

    BROWN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 23720-05S. Filed September 16, 2008. … Before 1991 petitioner married Stephen Brown (Brown). During the 1990s Brown and petitioner worked in real estate in Florida, California, and Hawaii.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kathy Gardner-Dickson v. Robert L. Wilkie

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 21, 2020

    Mayer v. Brown, 37 F.3d 618, 619 (Fed. Cir. 1994), overruled on other grounds by Bailey v. West, 160 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 1998); see 38 U.S.C. § 7266. … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 547, 553 (1994)). Thus, contrary to the petitioner's suggestion, there is no rule prohibiting remand just because negative evidence might be developed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Landers v. United States

    74 Fed. Cl. 668 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2006

    Brown Park EstatesFairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d at 1456. … Davidson v. United States, 66 Fed.Cl. at 209 (citing Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d at 1457).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • LEON-OROSCO AND RODRIGUEZ-COLAS

    19 I. & N. Dec. 136 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1984

    See Rejaie v. INS, 691 F.2d 139 (3d Cir. 1982). … Donovan v. Eamm's Drive Inn, 661 F.2d 316, 317 (5th Cir. 1981); Brown v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., 623 F.2d 450, 454 (6th Cir. 1980).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Application of Japikse

    181 F.2d 1019 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 9, 1950

    74-422, “507 Mechanical Movements” — Figs. 118— pages 32 and 33 — Copy in Division 14, Pub-lised 1908 by Brown & Seward, 261 Broadway, N.Y.C. … The decision of the board is affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Travis Brown v. Department of State

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 28, 2023

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD TRAVIS BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, SF-0752-22-0091-I-1 … Brown v. Department of Justice, 715 F.2d 662 (D.C. Cir. 1983), and aff’d sub nom. Otherson v. Department of Justice, 956 F.2d 1151, 1155 (Fed. Cir. 1992); Martin modified on other grounds by Barresi v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Francisco L. Marcelino v. David J. Shulkin

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 23, 2018

    See Hampton v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 481, 483 (1997) (claims remanded by the Board may not be reviewed by the Court). … See Davidson v. Shinseki, 581 F.3d 1313 (Fed. Cir. 2009); Hickson v. West, 12 Vet.App. 247, 253 (1999); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • KHAN

    26 I. & N. Dec. 797 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2016

    Agronick, Associate Legal Advisor BEFORE: Board Panel: MALPHRUS, MULLANE, and CREPPY, Board Members. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000), and Matter of Moncada, 24 I&N Dec. 62, 65 (BIA 2007)).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • James E. Haynes v. The United States

    418 F.2d 1380 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1969

    Plaintiff then appealed to the Board of Appeals and Review (B.A.R.) of the Civil Service Commission, and on September 23, 1965, the decision of the Regional Office was upheld. … Nor has he been able to point out how any of the Board findings are not supported by substantial evidence.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Raytheon Company

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Apr 9, 2018

    Cir. 2016); Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., ASBCA No. 56358 et al., 17-1 BCA ,r 36,779 at 179,246-47. … Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.

    8 Ct. Cust. 351 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 13, 1918

    Cadwalader ( 89 Fed., 963 ); Smith v. United States ( 93 Fed., 194 ). In Brown & Co. v. United States ( 7 Ct. Cust. Appls., 309 ; T. … The judgment of the board should be affirmed-.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • In re Donohue

    632 F.2d 123 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Sep 11, 1980

    This is an appeal from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) sustaining *124 the examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102 of claims 1 and 5-7 of application serial … In re LeGrice, 49 CCPA 1124, 1145, 301 F.2d 929, 944 , 133 USPQ 365 , 378 *126 (1962), In re Brown, 51 CCPA 1254, 1259, 329 F.2d 1006, 1011 , 141 USPQ 245 , 249 (1964).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Application of John R. Willingham

    282 F.2d 353 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 10, 1960

    In the opinion of the board, claim 12 included “the heart of the invention recited in claims 3 and 6.” … Justice Brown in Topliff v. Topliff, 1891, 145 U.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • McCabe v. Commissioner

    29 B.T.A. 1096 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 13, 1934

    WILLIAM JOHN MCCABE, PETITIONER, ET AL., 1 v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. McCabe v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 69777-69784, 69803. … Irvine 22 124 31 3,100 James Irvine 10 56 14 1,400 Lawrence Brown, estate 3 20 Mrs. P. A. Brown (heir) 32 8 800 Miss P. N. Brown (heir) 16 4 400 Lou M. Larkin 12 10 104 26 2,600 C. D. McCabe 10 56 14 1,400 Mildred K.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Petroleum Publishing Co. v. Bowers

    73 Ohio Law. Abs. 252 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 4, 1954

    The cause was submitted to the Board of Tax Appeals upon the notice of appeal, the transcript of proceedings before the tax commissioner, the evidence presented at a hearing before this board, and briefs of counsel. … Automobile Machine Company v. Brown, 121 Oh St 73.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hirmiz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    119 Fed. Cl. 209 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 19, 2014

    See Grand Light & Supply Co. v. Honeywell, Inc., 771 F.2d 672, 680 (2d Cir. 1985) (citing Browning Debenture Holders’ Comm. v. … (quoting Browning Debenture, 560 F.2d at 1086).

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.