Case law

Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation v. United States

43 Fed. Cl. 155 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 5, 1999

Reservation, Plaintiff, v. The United States, Defendant. … V-25 (emphasis supplied). . 1979 FMP p. IV-189. . Cooly Canyon-Dripping Springs, and permits and small sales. . Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 (Fed.Cir.1997).

Yajure Hurtado

29 I. & N. Dec. 216 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Sep 5, 2025

In addressing this issue, the Board must begin with the “plain language” of the INA. See Jimenez v. … Matter of C-T-L-, 25 I&N Dec. 341, 345 (BIA 2010) (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000)); see also Stenberg v.

Valenite Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jul 31, 2007

White, Esquire of White, Redway & Brown LLP for Valenite Inc. Christopher L. Buongiorno, Trademark Examining Attorney, Law Office 102 (Thomas V. … We see no error in the Board’s decision and accordingly deny the examining attorney’s request.

Rashid El Malik v. James B. Peake

22 Vet. App. 183 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 27, 2008

ORDER On July 22, 2007, pro se appellant Rashid El Malik filed a Notice of Appeal (NOA) from a May 30, 2007, Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) decision affirming the VA General Counsel's termination of Mr. … for his representation in VA-benefits cases prior to the Board's first final decision on the claims.

Halbert Construction Company, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 19, 2021

Cary v. United States, 552 F.3d 1373, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (citing Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 557 (2007)). … Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Garsow v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 30, 2013

Garsow's appeal of the November 2011 Board decision.2 See Hibbard, supra; see also Breeden v. … Brown, 10 Vet.App. 65, 66 (1997) ("[I]n order to attain prevailing-party status, a party is required to receive at least some relief on the merits of his claim." (quoting Sumner v.

Thomas J. Davis, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jul 1, 2021

Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. Murphy, 823 F.3d 622, 626 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (citations omitted). … FAR 33.201; see also Kellogg Brown & Root, 823 F.3d at 626; Electric Boat Corp. v. Sec’y of the Navy, 958 F.3d 1372, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2020).

Vantine & Co. v. United States

9 Ct. Cust. 291 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 12, 1919

At the hearing before the Board of General Appraisers the only witness on behalf of the importers, Dr. … The judgment of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

Wobber Bros. v. Commissioner

31 B.T.A. 133 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 31, 1934

Tait v. Western Maryland Ry. Co., 289 U.S. 620 ; Mary Haller, 26 B.T.A. 895 ; Charles P. Leirdnger, 29 B.T.A. 874 ; Portage Silica Co., 29 B.T.A. 881 . … Fisher v. Browning, 107 Miss. 729 ; 66 So. 132, 136 . Decision will he entered u/nder Rule 50.

United States v. Bush & Co.

5 Ct. Cust. 127 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 5, 1914

Manhattan Gas Light Co. v. Maxwell (2 Blatch., 405; 16 Fed. Cas., 601 ); United States v. Nash ( 27 Fed. Cas., 750 ); Marriott v. Brune ( 9 How., 619, 634 ); United States v. Southmayd (ib., 637); Austin v. … See also in this connection United States v. Rosenthal ( 126 Fed., 766 ) and Browne v. United States ( 145 Fed., 1 ).

Kathy Gardner-Dickson v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 21, 2020

Mayer v. Brown, 37 F.3d 618, 619 (Fed. Cir. 1994), overruled on other grounds by Bailey v. West, 160 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 1998); see 38 U.S.C. § 7266. … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 547, 553 (1994)). Thus, contrary to the petitioner's suggestion, there is no rule prohibiting remand just because negative evidence might be developed.

Application of Charles F. Baranauckas and Samuel Gelfand

395 F.2d 805 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 6, 1968

That content must be determined before the mandates of the Supreme Court set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 U.S. 1, 17 , 86 S.Ct. 684, 694 , 15 L.Ed.2d 545 (1966) may be accurately applied. … Magil wrote the opinion of the board. 2 .

Supreme Foodservice GmbH

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Apr 12, 2024

Bell/Heery v. United States, 739 F.3d 1324, 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (citing Hercules, Inc. v. United States, 24 F.3d 188, 198 (Fed.Cir.1994); San Carlos Irrigation & Drainage Dist. v. … E.g., Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2013). Once Supreme brought FFC on board, its employees continued to have a duty not to accept kickbacks or to rig the bids.

Bobby R. George v. David J. Shulkin

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 5, 2018

Grover v. West, 12 Vet.App. 109, 112 (1999); see also Damrel v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 242, 245 (1994); Russell v. … In Vigil v.

Schock, G. & Co. v. Commissioner

47 B.T.A. 415 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 4, 1942

Hann v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 147 Atl. 724 . Applying the test laid down in the oft-cited case of United States v. Anderson, 269 U. … The legislature has the power to discriminate among the various classes of property for the purpose of taxation, State Board of Assessors v. Central R. Co., 48 N. J. Law 146; 4 Atl. 578 ; Chancellor of State v.

Crawford & Doherty Foundry Co. v. Bowles

146 F.2d 861 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 1944

Capitol Foundry Co. v. Bowles, Em.App., 146 F.2d 855 , decided today; Armour and Company of Delaware v. Brown, Em.App.1943, 137 F.2d 233 ; Goodman v. Bowles, Em.App. 1943, 138 F.2d 917 . … It bases its argument to us upon the fact that pursuant to an order of the National War Labor Board, issued August 14, 1942, the wages of its employees were substantially increased effective April 1, 1942.

de Luca v. United States

84 Ct. Cl. 217 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1936

and/or the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation. … Co. v. United States, 261 U. S. 299 ; United States v. Benedict, 261 U. S. 294 ; Brown v. United States, 263 U. S. 78 , and Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United States, supra.

Rion v. Ault

455 F.2d 570 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 24, 1972

Ray v. Kronmiller, 167 F.2d 518 , 35 CC PA 1085 (1948) ; Ritzerfeld v. Kluit-mann, 94 F.2d 392 , 25 CCPA 845 (1938) ; Schuster v. … Brown, 69 F.2d 373 , 21 CC PA 932 (1934) ; and Kreek, Ancillary and Non-ancillary Matters in Patent Interferences, 36 JPOS 7, 15 (1954). . In Myers v.

Landers v. United States

74 Fed. Cl. 668 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2006

Brown Park EstatesFairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d at 1456. … Davidson v. United States, 66 Fed.Cl. at 209 (citing Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d at 1457).

Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. United States

39 Ct. Cl. 138 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 4, 1904

Weldon, J., delivered the opinion of the court: The brig Amiable Matilda, Brown, master, sailed on a commercial voyage on the 2d day of September, 1797, from Philadelphia, bound for Bilboa, Spain. … The privateer then fired again, and boarded the vessel with twelve or fourteen armed men under the command of Captain Sarrouble, who demanded of the master the ship’s papers.