Case law

SUFI Network Services, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 20, 2015

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., ASBCA Nos. 57530, 58161, 13 BCA ~ 35,379 at 173,602. … Thus, the Board's 2 February 2015 decision did not violate the CAFC's remand, foreclosing this ground for reconsideration. Having reconsidered our decision on Count XVI, we affirm it. Count V.

Tallman v. Commissioner

37 B.T.A. 1060 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 15, 1938

TALLMAN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Tallman v. Commissioner Docket No. 86550. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 37 B.T.A. 1060 ; 1938 BTA LEXIS 947 ; June 15, 1938 , Promulgated *947 Petitioner acted under a power of attorney to manage the finances of an invalid relative of his wife, from 1925 to

Snyder v. West

13 Vet. App. 244 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 23, 1999

McCreary, appealed pro se a December 28, 1990, Board of Veterans’ Appeals *245 (Board or BVA) decision denying a claim for an increased rating above 20% for a lumbosacral strain. McCreary v. Derwinski, U.S. Vet.App. … See Jones (Gloria) v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 388, 388-89 (1994) (noting that Court, in that case, had granted motion to intervene after granting motion for permission to file that motion out-of-time).

Raymond v. Commissioner

26 B.T.A. 1401 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 31, 1932

In re Brown, supra; Pfleghar Hardware Specialty Co. v. Commissioner, 30 Fed. (2d) 614. … Rotan v. United States, 43 Fed. (2d) 232.

Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Commissioner

23 B.T.A. 749 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 17, 1931

See also Willard v. Tayloe, 8 Wall. 557 ; Downey v. Hicks, 14 How. 240 ; Dodge v. Freedman's Sav. & T. Co., 93 U. S. 379 ; and Lukenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Ref. Co., 248 U. S. 139 . … See United States v. White Dental Mfg. Co., supra; and Jacob F. Brown et al., 18 B. T. A. 859. Reviewed by the Board. Judgment nmll be entered u/nder Rule 50.

Konet v. Haskins

179 F.2d 1003 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 2, 1950

Appellants cite Koch v. … The board sustained the motion to convert the joint application to a sole application of Haskins. We are in agreement with that holding of the board. In re Roberts, 49 App.D.C. 250 , 263 F. 646 ; Briggs et al. v.

LEON-OROSCO AND RODRIGUEZ-COLAS

19 I. & N. Dec. 136 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1984

See Rejaie v. INS, 691 F.2d 139 (3d Cir. 1982). … Donovan v. Eamm's Drive Inn, 661 F.2d 316, 317 (5th Cir. 1981); Brown v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., 623 F.2d 450, 454 (6th Cir. 1980).

United States v. Badische Co.

5 Ct. Cust. 226 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 14, 1914

. ■ ' *227 Tbe Board of General Appraisers sustained the protest and the Government appealed. … The designation of the bases as blue, green, violet, or brown does not at all indicate that they are of the color designated or that they are capable of imparting it, but that the base will produce the designated color when

James I. Evans v. Eric K. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 28, 2011

Brown, 9 Vet.App. 124, 132 (1996); Rowell v. Principi, 4 Vet.App. 9, 14 (1993). … West, 12 Vet.App. 272, 283 (1999); Buzinski v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 360, 367 (1994). On remand, I would instruct the Board to comply with the terms of 20 C.F.R. § 20.101 to clarify Mr. Evans's intent.

Lake County National Bank v. Kosydar

36 Ohio Misc. 189 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 26, 1973

The Board of Tax Appeals correctly interpreted Section 548(5) (c), Title 12, U. S. Code, and its decision is, therefore, affirmed. Decision affirmed. HERBERT, Coreigan', Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. … Brown, JJ., concur.

Halbert Construction Company, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 19, 2021

Cary v. United States, 552 F.3d 1373, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (citing Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 557 (2007)). … Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Crampton v. Gober

10 Vet. App. 386 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 1, 1997

Perez v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 452, 454 (1996) (emphasis added); see Butler v. Derwinski, 960 F.2d 139, 140-41 (Fed.Cir.1992). … The August 1, 1995, Board decision that the appellant seeks to appeal contains a similar statement of appellate rights. Cf. Grubbs v.

Brown v. Comm'r

2009 T.C. Summary Opinion 89 · United States Tax Court · Jun 4, 2009

BROWN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 12119-07S. Filed June 4, 2009. William A. Brown, pro se. Carrie L. … See, e.g., Commissioner v.

Conrad Shipyard, LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 24, 2025

The Board’s jurisdiction is primarily governed by the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7101-09 (CDA). Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., ASBCA Nos. 59385, 59744, 20-1 BCA ¶ 37,656 at 182,825. … Sys., Inc. v. United States, 778 F.3d 1000, 1005-06 (Fed.

Lloyd v. United States

6 Cust. Ct. 421 · United States Customs Court · Jun 3, 1941

protest, which must be, and always is, forwarded to the board by the collector.” … Upon appeal the board was reversed, the court .holding that' the protestant should have been given an opportunity to establish his authority on the trial of the action before the board.

George Ringler & Co. v. Commissioner

10 B.T.A. 1134 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 1, 1928

GEORGE RINGLER & CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. George Ringler & Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 8565. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 10 B.T.A. 1134 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3958 ; March 1, 1928 , Promulgated *3958 1.

Rashid El Malik v. James B. Peake

22 Vet. App. 183 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 27, 2008

ORDER On July 22, 2007, pro se appellant Rashid El Malik filed a Notice of Appeal (NOA) from a May 30, 2007, Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) decision affirming the VA General Counsel's termination of Mr. … for his representation in VA-benefits cases prior to the Board's first final decision on the claims.

Hopkins Co. v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 296 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 28, 1924

. * * * The Board of General Appraisers overruled the protest, General Appraiser Brown dissenting, and from the judgment.of the board the importer appealed. … The judgment of the Board of General Appraisers is against the evidence and must therefore be reversed.

Rion v. Ault

455 F.2d 570 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 24, 1972

Ray v. Kronmiller, 167 F.2d 518 , 35 CC PA 1085 (1948) ; Ritzerfeld v. Kluit-mann, 94 F.2d 392 , 25 CCPA 845 (1938) ; Schuster v. … Brown, 69 F.2d 373 , 21 CC PA 932 (1934) ; and Kreek, Ancillary and Non-ancillary Matters in Patent Interferences, 36 JPOS 7, 15 (1954). . In Myers v.

OPPEDISANO

26 I. & N. Dec. 202 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2013

FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000); see also Robinson v. Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337, 340 (1997); Matter of Arrabally and Yerrabelly, 25 I&N Dec. 771, 775 (BIA 2012). … See Gourche v.