Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.35s
Commercial Aluminum Cookware Co. v. United States
20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1007 · United States Court of International Trade · Aug 13, 1996
Because “lids” are clearly embraced eo nomine within “[closures imported separately” of subheading 7010.90.20, HTSUS, plaintiff reasons, and because there are no express limitations — other than that the closures be “of glass … A plain reading of the heading reveals these limitations only apply to those items that precede the qualifying language.
Cited 13 timesPublished58 T.C. 459 · United States Tax Court · Jun 14, 1972
The evidence clearly establishes that prior to 1967, the year in which petitioner received the proceeds of his lawsuit, he had recovered his entire investment in the property, either through allowances for depreciation or … The law is well settled that a sale of property and repurchase of other property do not qualify for nonrecognition treatment under section 1031. Carlton v. United States, 385 F. 2d 238, 241 (C.A. 5, 1967); John M.
Cited 23 timesPublished23 I. & N. Dec. 829 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2005
204(j) of the Act and the general process for obtaining an employment-based visa petition also support our conclusion that Congress did not intend that the Immigration Judges would determine whether an alien continues to qualify … The INS deemed this to be necessary in order to avoid a recertification of the alien’s labor certification by the DOL and clearly considered the “same or similar” determination to be within its realm of authority.
Cited 5 timesPublishedElk Discount Corp. v. Commissioner
4 T.C. 196 · United States Tax Court · Oct 17, 1944
Smith, tJudge: The petitioner concedes that it qualifies as a personal holding company for the calendar years 1938, 1939, and 1940 so far as stock ownership is concerned. … Clearly, if the dealer had not sold the conditional sales contracts and notes to the petitioner, but had collected the installment payments himself, he would not have received interest.
Cited 6 timesPublished52 T.C. 440 · United States Tax Court · Jun 16, 1969
These facts establish to our satisfaction that the corporation retained the claim and did not assign it to its stockholders. … In short, the regulations predicate continued corporate existence on the corporation’s retention of assets, and not on its “qualified” existence under State law. See J. Ungar, Inc., supra.
Cited 28 timesPublishedTexaco, Inc. v. Department of Energy
795 F.2d 1021 · Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · May 30, 1986
DECONTROL Although terminating the allocation and price controls as of January 28,1981, Executive Order 12287 clearly authorized DOE to publish, if it chose to do so, further entitlements based on refiners’ purchases of crude … No law or regulation is immune to change by lawful means and no person can reasonably assume the contrary.”)
Cited 6 timesPublishedMcDonald v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 2, 2021
furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly … See Ex. 12 at 10 (M.G.M. was “seen previously in the neurology clinic due to seizure like activity that occurred after pertussis immunization.”). Furthermore, Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedParticipation by Aliens in Scholarship Program
61 Pa. D. & C.2d 738 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · Jan 15, 1973
PACKEL, Attorney General, You have inquired whether proposed Regulation 100, which establishes a citizenship requirement for state scholarships, is lawful. … The court in Chapman noted that the scholarship *741 program at issue in that case was intended to achieve a worthy public objective — “to spawn qualified resident professionals.”
Cited 0 timesPublished70 T.C. 373 · United States Tax Court · May 31, 1978
Conklin, was qualified to express an opinion as to the replacement or reproduction cost of the building situated on the property. … The legislative history of section 4941 clearly indicates that actual harm to the foundation is not an implied element in the definition of self-dealing.
Modified by Adams v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 81 (1979)Cited 29 timesPublishedY. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 2, 2020
Indeed, it is Respondent’s view that Petitioners have not clearly delineated what A.Y.’s injury actually is. Id. at 6–7. … Varicella is especially dangerous to children and the immune-compromised.
Cited 0 timesPublished65 T.C. 723 · United States Tax Court · Jan 19, 1976
The four irrevocable CR trusts were established by petitioner between 1962 and 1965. … The CR trusts’ terms clearly indicate that the capital gains were allocable and attributable to corpus.
Cited 8 timesPublished22 Cl. Ct. 147 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 30, 1990
During their tours of AD, IRS officers remain eligible for separation in advance of their established DOS according to AFM 33-4 and AFR 36-12, as appropriate. … and applies therefor; or (2) if he is not qualified or does not apply therefor, be discharged from his reserve appointment.
Cited 3 timesPublishedApplicability of Solicitation of Charitable Funds Act to Local Libraries
64 Pa. D. & C.2d 718 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · Mar 20, 1974
only the power and authority granted them by enabling statutory legislation.” *724 What must logically follow from the court’s statement is that municipal corporations are controlled entirely by the legislature and are not immune … This is the universal rule of constitutional law, and in no state has it been more clearly expressed and more uniformly applied than in Pennsylvania. . . .
Cited 0 timesPublished32 T.C. 839 · United States Tax Court · Jun 30, 1959
We think the facts which have been stipulated by the parties clearly show that 25 per cent of the amounts which petitioner received from the Government of American Samoa in 1952 and 1953 was paid to him as cost-of-living … However, American Samoa was not designated as an area at which territorial cost-of-living allowances were to be paid although it is possible that an area may qualify for both.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn re the Adjudication of the Guilt of Spector
42 Cust. Ct. 726 · United States Customs Court · Apr 6, 1959
. *750 The History of the origin and development of this court clearly indicates that Congress did not clothe it with criminal jurisdiction. … Older cases established the same principle, notably Farnsworth v. Territory of Montana, 129 U.S. 104 , and Cross v. United States, 145 U.S. 571 . In the cases of Cox & Fahner (Steel Union-Sheet Piling, Inc.) et al. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished2 T.C. 25 · United States Tax Court · Jun 8, 1943
Therefore, in accordance with its established practice of bookkeeping, the petitioner was warranted in accounting for the profits of the contract in the year 1922. … Moreover, Day was a qualified construction engineer.
Cited 5 timesPublishedColumbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Commissioner
32 T.C. 39 · United States Tax Court · Apr 10, 1959
. -- The petitioner, owner of radio station KQW, held qualified for relief under the commitment provision of section 722(b)(4) as a result of its actions during the base period in attempting to become the San Francisco Bay … A number of things which the petitioner did to improve its position cannot be regarded as clearly evidencing a commitment.
Cited 3 timesPublished15 I. & N. Dec. 376 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1975
377 Interim Decision #2404 performing skilled or unskilled labor, unless the Secretary of Labor has determined and certified . . . that (A) there are not sufficient workers in the United States who are able, willing, qualified … It is our conclusion that the applications should be denied in the exercise of the Attorney General's discretion on the ground that the adult alien's application is clearly an attempt to circumvent the intent of Section 212
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohn T. Bill Co. v. United States
104 F.2d 67 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 29, 1939
The cases are clearly distinguishable. … irreconcilable, the duty of the court — no purpose to repeal being clearly expressed or indicated —is, if possible, .to give effect to both.”
Cited 0 timesPublished24 Cl. Ct. 205 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 26, 1991
McDowell was clearly limited in his activities to a much greater extent than the government’s 20% and 40% ratings would reflect. … In addition, the Federal Circuit, in the first sentence of its opinion, quickly disposed of the government's argument, stating simply: “[t]his court’s precedents establish that the Claims Court possesses jurisdiction to review
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna