Case law

Stroheim v. United States

13 Ct. Cust. 489 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 2, 1926

In support of this contention appellants have cited Brown & Co v. United States, 11 Ct. Cu . Appls. 403, and United States v. Matagrin, 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 309 . … The cases of Brown & Co., supra, and Matagrin, supra, are not in point. The opinion of the board, in this case, was controlled by its decision in the case of Fenton & Co. v. United States, G. A. 8820, T. D. 40260.

Fernandez v. Commissioner

15 B.T.A. 1369 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 11, 1929

Smith v. Butler, 85 Tex. 126 ; 19 S. W. 1083 ; Farmer v. Zinn, 261 S. W. 1073 ; affd. 276 S. W. 191 . … A. 194; Edwards v. Brown, 68 Tex. 331 ; 5 S. W. 87 ; and Merrill v. Moore, 47 Tex. Civ. App. 200 . See also United States v. Robbins, 269 U. S. 315 .

Thuron Industries, Inc. v. Conard-Pyle Co.

579 F.2d 633 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 30, 1978

The board in Jenkins Publishing Co. v. … See Coca-Cola Co. v. Rodriguez Flavoring Syrups, Inc., 89 USPQ 36 (Examiner in Chief 1951); Brown & Bigelow v. International Silver Co., 86 USPQ 460 (Comm’r Pat. 1950). .

ECC International Constructors, LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jan 6, 2022

See Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. Sec’y of the Army, 973 F.3d 1366, 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2020); Lowder v. Dep’t of Homeland Security, 504 F.3d 1378, 1383 (Fed. Cir. 2007). … WILSON Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Acting Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

Eddie D. Ray v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 14, 2019

Cir. 1994). 46 See, e.g., Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electrs. Co., Ltd., 809 F.3d 633, 639 (Fed. Cir. 2015). 47 Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995). 48 See 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1); see also Frost v. … Department of Commerce for the poverty threshold for one person"). 100 Pederson, 27 Vet.App. at 286. 101 Van Hoose v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 361, 363 (1993) (emphasis in original). 102 Gleicher v.

Donovan v. Gober

11 Vet. App. 2 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 19, 1997

); Elkins v. … Brown, 8 Vet.App. 391, 396 (1995) (CUE claim could not be raised as to RO decision because service connection for psychiatric disability was subject of subsuming BVA decision); Landicho v.

Gerald S. Corwin v. Anthony J. Principi

18 Vet. App. 246 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 25, 2004

See Burton v. Principi, 15 Vet.App. 276, 277 (2001) (per curiam order). The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will affirm the Board decision. … See McDowell v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 401, 405 (1993). This Court has recently addressed a nearly identical attempt to re-raise an earlier-effective- date claim. Bissonnette v. Principi, 18 Vet.App. 105 (2004).

Lemelson v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 161 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 26, 1983

In Price v. … Ellis v. Carter, 328 F.2d 573 (9th Cir.1964). In Ellis v.

Bailey-Mora Co. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 99 · United States Customs Court · Jul 26, 1966

United States (Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc., Party in Interest), 51 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 829. The merchandise in that case consisted of pine wood moldings produced on a molding machine. … Tower & Sons v.

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 9, 2020

States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1542V (not to be published) ANNIE BROWN … , Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v.

Paul Cardoza v. Denis McDonough

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 10, 2024

Brown, 6 Vet.App. 277 (1994). … Take our decision in Mintz v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 277 (1994).

Melvin Aponte v. R. James Nicholson

21 Vet. App. 470 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 24, 2007

v. … In Sandoval v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 177 (1996), this Court held that, for the Washington, D.C., area (in which Ms.

Carnie-Goudie Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner

18 B.T.A. 893 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 21, 1930

Stephensen v. Cornell, 10 Ind. 475 ; Young v. Smith, 25 Mo. 341 ; Brown v. Epperson, 136 Mo. App. 57 ; 118 S. W. 528 ; Bissell's Ex’rs. v. Warde, 129 Mo. 439 ; 31 S. W. 228 . … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Wayne Calhoun v. Denis McDonough

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 9, 2024

Principi, 15 Vet.App. 1, 6 (2001); Evans v. West, 12 Vet.App. 396, 401 (1999); Hanson v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 29, 32 (1996); see also 38 U.S.C. § 7261(a)(4). … Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (table).

Larry W. Mattox v. Denis McDonough

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 26, 2021

Shalala, 508 U.S. 402 (1993); Goodman v. Shulkin, 870 F.3d 1383, 1386 (Fed. Cir. 2017). 31 Tropf v. Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 317, 320 (2006) (quoting Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 120 (1994)); see also Kisor v. … .78 In short, the Board performed its function as 73 See Locklear v.

Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 323 · United States Customs Court · Mar 31, 1955

Borgfeldt & Co. v. United States, 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 421 , T. D. 39433; United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc., 34 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 112, C. A. D. 351. … Washington State Liquor Control Board (Transferee) v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 58 , C. D. 1299; Ungerer & Co., Inc. v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 302 , C. D. 1483.

Michael E. Brown & Miriam L. Mercado-Brown v. Commissioner

2019 T.C. Memo. 30 · United States Tax Court · Apr 8, 2019

BROWN AND MIRIAM L. MERCADO-BROWN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 21096-15. Filed April 8, 2019. … See Barrett v. Commissioner, at *10; see also Green v.

McConnell v. United States

5 Cl. Ct. 785 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 27, 1984

Conway was a wage board employee serving as a lock master on the Kentucky River System. … Finally, the Howard Brown Administrative Report was not objectionable because it reflects Corps Comptroller Brown’s opinion. . Plaintiffs other arguments have been considered carefully and rejected.

Barnard v. District of Columbia

20 Ct. Cl. 257 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1885

It appears that in some cases like the present the Board of Public Works did allow and pay contractors the board rate for rock excavations. … The claimant was thus overpaid by Board of Audit on that account the sum of $1,519.07. (Neitzey’s Case, 17 C. Cls. R., 101 ; Brown’s Case, 17 C. Cls. R., 420.)

In re the Fee Agreement of Cox

11 Vet. App. 158 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 31, 1998

Myers v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 127, 130 (1991); see generally Mingo v. Derwinski, [ 2 Vet.App. 51, 53-54 (1992) ], citing Hottest [a ]d v. … Fee Agreement of Smith, supra; see also Browder v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 268, 270 (1993) (“Under the doctrine of ‘law of the case,’ questions settled on a former appeal of the same case are no longer open for review.”)