Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.56s
Wilbur M. Van Otteren v. William J. Hafner and Gordon H. Cork
278 F.2d 738 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 1, 1960
Counsel for Van Otteren rely on an affidavit by James V. … It is well settled that a duly executed joint application is prima facie evidence of joint inventorship; Brown v. Edeler et al., 110 F.2d 858 , 27 CCPA 1091, and cases there cited.
Cited 4 timesPublishedJohn Edwards v. Department of Labor
2022 MSPB 9 · Merit Systems Protection Board · May 5, 2022
The administrative judge noted that one Board decision, Armstrong v. … See Brown v.
Cited 131 timesPublishedJeanine Frazier v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 23, 2024
Brown, 4 Vet.App. 516, 518 (1993) (Board remand to determine whether daughter qualified as a "child" for accrued benefits purposes)). 38 38 U.S.C. § 5121(a). 39 Gillis v. … Peake, 22 Vet.App. 97, 107 (2008) (per curiam). 94 Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995). 95 Tucker v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDaniel R. Gilbert v. Eric K. Shinseki
26 Vet. App. 48 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 24, 2012
See, e.g., Wagner v. … Brown, 8 Vet.App. 342, 345 (1995) (holding that Board’s finding of no relationship between any in-service injury and a current disability was "not clearly erroneous”); Gilbert v.
Cited 11 timesPublished4 Ct. Cl. 579 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1868
Browning, one of the firm to whom the claim is-assigned, are both suppressed as being interested in the claim and incompetent to testify. … Browning and others, executors of John E. Hanford, the sum of eight thousand seven hundred and seven dollars and thirty-four cents ($8,707 34.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Regents, The University of Texas System v. Southern Illinois Miners, LLC
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Mar 13, 2014
_____ The Board of Regents, The University of Texas System v. … See McDonald’s Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLinda L. Swinney v. Eric K. Shinseki
23 Vet. App. 257 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 7, 2009
The Board, relying on Cotton v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 325 (1995), stated that whether a situation is a medical emergency is a medical question best answered by a physician. Id. … Tucker v. West, 11 Vet.App. 369, 374 (1998) ("[W]here the Board has incorrectly applied the law . . . a remand is the appropriate remedy."); see Hicks v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 417, 422 (1995). On remand, Ms.
Cited 2 timesPublished671 F.2d 1362 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 25, 1982
v. … Lamp v.
Cited 3 timesPublished18 I. & N. Dec. 324 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1982
• Interim Decision #2924 MATTER OF BROWN In Deportation Proceedings A-30085015 Decided by Board September … McGrath 116 Lincoln Street General Attorney Boston, Massachusetts 02111 Milhollan, Chairman; Maniatis, Dunne, Morris, and Vacca, Board Members The Immigration and Naturalization
Cited 8 timesPublished87 F.2d 532 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 8, 1937
The examiner rejected claim 25 as unpatentable either over Brown-lee et al. or Wulff, 1,917,627. … We agree with the decision of the Board of Appeals, and it is affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished476 F.2d 650 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 26, 1973
Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17 , 86 S.Ct. 684 , 15 L. Ed.2d 545 (1966). … See In re Brown, 459 F.2d 531, 535 , 59 C.C.P.A. - (1972) and the case cited therein.
Cited 11 timesPublishedWilliam Sheppard v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 15, 2021
We acknowledge that, in the regulatory history, VA cited Barnett v. Brown, 83 F.3d 1380, 1383 (Fed. … Prillaman v. Principi, 346 F.3d 1362, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2003); Jackson v. Principi, 265 F.3d. 1366, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2001); Barnett v. Brown, 83 F.3d 1380, 1384 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Woehlaert v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKeith A. Roberts v. James B. Peake
22 Vet. App. 187 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 8, 2008
Roberts argues for reversal of the Board's determination that he committed fraud. … Winslow v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 469, 471 (1996) (denying motion for oral argument where Court does not believe it will materially assist the disposition of the appeal).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 30, 2026
See e.g., Brown Park Ests.-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1456 (Fed. … (Def.’s xMJAR at 16–18 (citing Brown v. United States, 3 Cl. Ct. 31, 47 (1983), aff’d, 741 F.2d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 1984); Rick’s Mushroom Serv., Inc. v. United States, 521 F.3d 1338, 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2008))). Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Nov 24, 2021
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 62681, 62843, 62844 … Appeals of Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.
Cited 0 timesPublished240 F.2d 351 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 9, 1957
The board did not point out the “obvious chemical similarities” and did not explain the pertinence of the De Bell and Bayer citations. … As to the manipulative steps involved, Bayer states that in producing polyurethanes, “In contrast with the case of polyamides we can work in open vessels, for the admission of atmospheric oxygen does not cause any brown coloration
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 27, 2022
Moran * v. … Brown moved for a ruling on the record. I. Procedural History Kimberley Brown (“petitioner”) filed her petition on October 8, 2019.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMai De Hart v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 23, 2024
Id. at 8, 9 (citing Hamilton v. Brown, 39 F.3d 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1994), and Harper v. Wilkie, 30 Vet.App. 356 (2018)). The Secretary sees things differently. … See AB v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 35, 38 (1993).
Cited 0 timesPublished12 Ct. Cust. 81 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 9, 1924
D. 35002); United States v. Maine Central Railway Co. (7 id. 114; T. D. 36427); Hartranft v. Weigmann ( 121 U. S. 609 ).—Smillie & Co. v. United States ( 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 199 ; T. D. 38966). … The judgment of the board overruling the protest is accordingly reversed, and the case is remanded.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBrown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 22, 2022
, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. … OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ***************************** ELIZABETH BROWN, * * Petitioner, * * V
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna