Case law

Washington State Liquor Control Board v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 301 · United States Customs Court · Oct 4, 1960

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. R. C. … Williams & Co., Inc. ( 40 C.C.P.A. 130 , C.A.D. 508), and Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States ( 22 Cust. Ct. 33 , C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Davis v. Principi

15 Vet. App. 163 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 29, 2001

See Kutcherousky v. West, 12 Vet.App. 369, 372-73 (1999) (per curiam order). The Board shall proceed expeditiously. See Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act, Pub. L. … . § 5101 note) (requiring Secretary to provide for "expeditious treatment" of claims remanded by Board or Court); Drosky v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 251, 257 (1997).

Washington State Liquor Control Board v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 414 · United States Customs Court · Dec 1, 1959

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. R. C. … Williams & Co., Inc. ( 40 C.C.P.A. 130 , C.A.D. 508), and Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States ( 22 Cust. Ct. 33 , C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cunard Steamship Co. v. United States

22 C.C.P.A. 615 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 4, 1935

The trial court in its decision relied upon our decision in the case of United States v. American Brown Boveri Electric Corporation, 17 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 329, T. D. 43776. … D. 42217, not cited in the Brown Boveri case, supra, supports in principle the construction given in the latter case to the phrase “to be used exclusively as models.” In Bentner v.

General Webb v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 26, 2020

Brown, 6 Vet.App. 405, 407 (1994)) (internal quotation marks omitted), and "sufficiently inform[s] the Board of a medical expert's judgment on a medical question and the essential rationale for that opinion," Monzingo v. … D'Aries v. Peake, 22 Vet.App. 97, 104 (2008) (per curiam); Russo v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 46, 50 (1996).

Bobby R. George v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 26, 2020

Wilkie, 30 Vet.App. 267, 274 (2018); Damrel v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 242, 245 (1994); Russell v. Principi, 3 Vet.App. 310, 313-14 (1992) (en banc). 36 Andrews v. … Cir. 2002). 40 Russell, 3 Vet.App. at 315. 41 Acciola v. Peake, 22 Vet.App. 320, 325 (2008) (citing Sondel v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 218, 219-20 (1994)). 42 See McNutt v. Gen.

Louisa Co. v. Commissioner

45 B.T.A. 1056 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 18, 1941

Bergan v. Commissioner, 80 Fed. (2d) 89; Leach v. Commissioner, 50 Fed. (2d) 371; Inland Products Co. v. Blair, 31 Fed. (2d) 867; Bohemian Breweries, Inc. v. United States, 27 Fed. Supp. 588; Joseph V. Horn, 23 B. T. … Brown, supra. [10 B. T. A. 1122); and see Lehigh Valley Coal Sales Co., 15 B. T. A. 1401.

Percy Ledbetter v. Department of Veterans Affairs

2022 MSPB 41 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 12, 2022

See Brown v. U.S. … Supreme Court’s decision in Bowles v.

Warren L. Johnson v. Anthony J. Principi

18 Vet. App. 503 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 19, 2004

This reason is not a proper basis for exercising the authority and power of the Court to vacate a final Board decision. See 38 U.S.C. §§ 7252(a), 7261(a); see also Akers v. … ."); Aronson v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 153, 155 (1994) (where issue becomes moot, Court is divested of jurisdiction to consider it); Cerullo v.

In re George

68 F.2d 571 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 12, 1934

The only references discussed by the Board of Appeals with respect to the claims on appeal are the Nead and Browne references, and we are of the opinion that these are the only references which are material to the questions … In such case there would clearly be no invention; but appellant insists, and as hereinafter noted the Board of Appeals conceded, that the treatment of steel sheets shown by the reference Browne, upon which the board relied

Price v. United States

7 Ct. Cl. 567 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1871

Brown, exactly agree with Captain Brown’s own account. … The amount consumed was fixed by a board of inquiry, but may very easily have been underestimated. It was found by the board to have been one hundred and forty-three and one-half bales.

Redding v. West

13 Vet. App. 512 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 22, 2000

Baker v. … While the Board must interpret the veteran's submissions broadly, the Board is not required to conjure up issues that were not raised by the claimant. See Talbert v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 352 (1995).

Richard W. Staab v. Robert A. McDonald

28 Vet. App. 50 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 8, 2016

Janssen v. Principi, 15 Vet.App. 370, 379 (2001) (per curiam); see Mason v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 44, 59 (1995). The appellant had active service in the U.S. … Remand is thus required for the Board to readjudicate the appellant's claim and properly apply 38 U.S.C. § 1725. See Tucker v.

August Storck KG v. Florend Indústria e Comércio de Chocolates LTDA

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 27, 2026

The colors red, gold, light brown, dark brown, blue, green, purple, and beige are claimed as features of the mark. … The color dark brown appears in the chocolates and the chocolate wrapper. The colors purple, beige, light brown, green, and blue appear in the chocolate wrappers.

Washington State Liquor Control Board v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 193 · United States Customs Court · Apr 24, 1951

Bush & Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 158 , C.

Alion Science and Technology Corporation

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Nov 10, 2015

.; Brunswick Bank & Trust Co. v. United States, 707 F.2d 1355, 1360 (Fed. Cir. 1983). FAR 52.242-4. … San Francisco Ship Repair, ASBCA No. 58810, 14-1 BCA ~ 35,667 at 174,588; Teledyne Brown Eng'g, Inc., ASBCA No. 58636, 14-1BCA~35,495 at 173,998.

Highland Al Hujaz Co., Ltd.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jul 13, 2015

The motion was not opposed by the government and was granted by the Board on 11 March 2015. The Board received its copy of the Rule 4 file on 15 April 2015. … E.g., Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., ASBCA No. 59557, 15-1 BCA ii 35,865; Beechcraft Defense Co., ASBCA No. 59173, 14-1BCAii35,592; RO. Vl.B. Sri, ASBCA No. 56198, 09-1BCAii34,068.

07-20 154

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 31, 2012

Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 55 (1994). … See 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(1) (2011); Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337, 338-39 (1996).

Moore v. West

13 Vet. App. 69 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 30, 1999

See Brown v. … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 396, 402 (1994); EF v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 324, 326 (1991); cf. AB v.

In re Fitzgerald

619 F.2d 67 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 3, 1980

This is an appeal from a decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Appeals (“board”) sustaining the rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 34-35, 41, 50-51, and 54 on Barnes; claims 36-37 on Barnes … In re Brown, 59 CCPA 1036, 1041, 459 F.2d 531, 535 , 173 USPQ 685, 688 (1972).