Case law

Flemming v. Principi

16 Vet. App. 52 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 4, 2002

IVERS, Judge: On April 2, 1999, the Court, in a single-judge order, vacated a July 29, 1997, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision and remanded the matter on appeal to the Board for readjudication. … In Sumner , the Court addressed its decision in Stillwell v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 291 (1994), its pre-Buckhannon seminal decision defining an EAJA prevailing party.

Smiley v. Commissioner

33 B.T.A. 198 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 15, 1935

Corbett Investment Co. v. Helvering, 75 Fed. (2d) 525). … A. 789; Jamas Brown, 10 B. T. A. 1036. Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Buie 60.

Brandon Brown & Christi Cloaninger Brown v. Commissioner

2018 T.C. Summary Opinion 6 · United States Tax Court · Feb 5, 2018

Summary Opinion 2018-6 UNITED STATES TAX COURT BRANDON BROWN AND CHRISTI CLOANINGER BROWN, Petitioners v. … Co. v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. at 106; see also Gibson & Assocs., Inc. v. Commissioner, 136 T.C. at 233.

Mark R. Lippman v. R. James Nicholson

21 Vet. App. 184 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 24, 2007

Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995) 8 (holding that the Board's statement "must be adequate to enable a claimant to understand the precise basis for the Board's decision … Brown, 4 Vet.App. 434, 437 (1993))); Jones v.

BROWNE

12 I. & N. Dec. 312 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1967

", "Guest Star-Coral Browne", or "Coral Browne as Molly Luther"; that the part the beneficiary is to play requires an English woman with pseudo- aristocratic pretensions and airs, which would be most difficult for any one … The Guild Board of Directors, the Guild membership, consisting of actors of all categories, including many who are also producers and directors; 2.

Antonio Pacheco v. Sloan D. Gibson

27 Vet. App. 21 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 17, 2014

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) (“The meaning — or ambiguity— of certain words or phrases may only become evident when placed in context.”); Brown v. … . § 7111 (e) (stating that a request for revision of a Board decision based on CUE shall be submitted directly to the Board); Andre v.

Colony Construction

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Nov 22, 2023

Co., ASBCA No. 60723, 17-1 BCA ¶ 36,839 at 179,519 (citing Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972)). … Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2013). Respondent’s motion to dismiss is denied.

A. J. Van Dugteren & Sons, Inc. v. United States

25 Cust. Ct. 302 · United States Customs Court · Oct 30, 1950

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Washington State Liquor Control Board (34 C. C. P. A. 118, C. A. … In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, as well as that in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A.

Coro, Inc. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 265 · United States Customs Court · Jan 13, 1955

It was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in United States v. Washington State Liquor Control Board (34 C. C. P. A. 118, C. A. … In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited, as well as that in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A.

Gabriel v. United States

9 Cust. Ct. 109 · United States Customs Court · Jul 23, 1942

See Brown v. United States, T. D. 44461. Our appellate court has also passed upon this, question in the case of United States v. Robinson, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 145 , T. D. 40062. … See Tingirides v. United States, Abstract 2232. In the case of United States v. Henry Maier, 18 Ct. Cust. Appls. 409 , T.

Ray v. Kronmiller

167 F.2d 518 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 6, 1948

See Erben v. Yardley, 267 Fed. 345 , 1920 C. D. 220; Isaac Stern and Jacob Huether v. Louis H. Schroeder and Joshua Wagner, 17 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 690, 36 F. (2d) 518, 3 U. S. Pat. Q. 351; Albert Broadmeyer v. … The situation here presented is similar to that in the case of Schuster v. Brown, 21 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 932, 69 F. (2d) 373, 21 U. S. Pat. Q. 11.

United States v. Goldberg's Sons

3 Ct. Cust. 282 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 17, 1912

Brown v. Piper ( 91 U. S., 37, 42 ), Jones v. United States ( 137 U. S., 202, 216 ), Nelson v. Cushing ( 2 Cush., 519 , 532, 533), Page v. … The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.

Barnes v. District of Columbia

22 Ct. Cl. 366 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 31, 1887

Board, of Supervisors, etc., v. Bowen (4 Lansing, 24) was a case of compromise of a suit at law pending an appeal. In Bean v. … . *388 In Nelson v.

United States v. Shallus & Co.

9 Ct. Cust. 168 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 18, 1919

Brown v. Maryland ( 12 Wheat., 419 ); May v. New Orleans ( 178 U. S., 496, 507 ). … The decision of the board is reversed, and case remanded for trial.

In re the Fee Agreement of Stanley

9 Vet. App. 203 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 27, 1996

at 11) when the Board had “continuing jurisdiction [over] the case” (Br. at 10) under Hamilton v. … Brown, 4 Vet.App. 528 (1993) (en banc), aff'd 39 F.3d 1574 (Fed.Cir.1994).

In re the Fee Agreement of Vernon

8 Vet. App. 457 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 2, 1996

The Court granted the motion for remand and vacated the Board’s decision. Vernon v. Derwinski, U.S. Vet.App. No. 91-1812, 2 Vet.App. 534 (order May 26, 1992). … While the record reflects that counsel received a copy of the Board’s decision and notice of this appeal, he has not chosen to file a brief. See Nagler v.

Paul L. Ollis v. Robert A. McDonald

27 Vet. App. 405 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 28, 2015

In Brown v. … Rottman,10 specifically "recommended that I have the 9 The majority accurately describes the Supreme Court's holding in Brown v.

Inn at St. John's, LLC

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 6, 2018

The mark consists of the wording 5IVESTEAK presented in the colors red and brown, with the color red appearing in the number “5” and letters “IVE,” and the color brown appearing in the letters “STEAK.” … See Juice Generation v. GS Enters., 115 USPQ2d at 1676 (Board paid insufficient heed to the word JUICE in mark for juice bar services).

Curren v. Commissioner

34 B.T.A. 946 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 14, 1936

Typical cases are: Lucas v. Reed, 281 U. S. 699 , an attorney employed by a state to conduct one piece of litigation; Lucas v. Howard, 280 U. … Brown, 22 B. T. A. 581; D. F. Strickland, 16 B. T. A. 419; Burnet v. Livezey, 48 Fed. (2d) 159; R. E. McIntosh, 16 B. T. A. 1400; B. F. Martin, 12 B. T. A. 267; W. B. Mathews, 13 B. T. A. 1133; Rosalie C.

Estate of Maresi v. Commissioner

6 T.C. 582 · United States Tax Court · Mar 26, 1946

A., 1st Cir.), 128 Fed. (2d) 618, decided long after the Humes case, a determination of the Board of Tax Appeals (Estate of Francis Browne Grinnell, 44 B. T. … Humes v. United States, supra.