Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

6.84s

  • In re HANLEY-BIED & CO.

    2 B.T.A. 315 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 11, 1925

    United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 315 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2458 ; July 11, 1925 , Decided Submitted May 26, 1925 . *2458 1. … Brown and E. U. Crosby, insurance brokers identified *2459 with the firm of Henry W.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Browne v. United States

    356 F.2d 546 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1966

    In Gordy v. … On July 19, 1952, the board of directors of Housing met to consider J. Browne’s proposal. On that date, Housing wrote a letter to J.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • United States v. Washington State Liquor Control Board

    34 C.C.P.A. 118 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 4, 1946

    The Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, in affirming the foregoing decision of the board, United States v. E. L. Goodsell Co., 91 Fed. 519 , expressly approved the doctrine therein enunciated. … That contention was discussed and overruled in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc., 34 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 112, C. A. D. 351, Appeal No. 4531, decided concurrently herewith.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • LUTHERAN MINISTRIESOF FLORIDA

    20 I. & N. Dec. 185 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1990

    BY: Milhollan, Chairman; Dunne, Morris, Vacca, and Heilman, Board Members; Brown, Temporary Board Member An application, on Form G-27 (Request for Recognition as a Non- Profit Religious, Charitable, Social Service … Any such application should be filed with the Board, along with proof of service of a copy of the application on the appropriate district director.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • University of South Florida Board of Trustees v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 11, 2021

    Brown, Senior Litigation Counsel, with whom were Jeffrey Bossert Clark, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and Gary L. … Biery v. United States, 818 F.3d 704, 711 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 389 (2016) (quoting Young v. United States, 94 Fed. Cl. 671, 674 (2010)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clifford H. Cox v. Robert A. McDonald

    28 Vet. App. 318 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 7, 2016

    See Tallman v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 453, 461 (1995) (holding that ambiguity exists when a statute can be interpreted by reasonably well-informed people in two or more ways), rev'd on other grounds, 105 F.3d 613 (Fed. … Cir. 1997); see also Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994) ("Ambiguity is a creature not of definitional possibilities but of statutory context . . . .").

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • W. E. Beckmann Bakers' & Confectioners' Supply Co. v. Commissioner

    13 B.T.A. 860 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 9, 1928

    Browning Co., 6 B. T. … The contracts were paid in to the petitioner corporation by the Brownings without any consideration therefor *863 except the nominal consideration of one dollar, and under the decision of this Board in the Appeal of Herald-Dispatch

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hayre v. Principi

    15 Vet. App. 48 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 14, 2001

    See Woods v. Gober, 14 Vet.App. 214 (2000); Hyson v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 262 (1993); see also Tablazon v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 359 (1995). … See, e.g., Hauck v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 518 (1994); Kuo v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • City of Saint Louis v. United States

    9 Ct. Cl. 455 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1873

    It is sufficient for the purposes of this opinion to say, that Brown’s survey contained within its out-boundaries nearly double the quantity of land claimed by the inhabitants of Oar-ondelet in 1808 before the board of commissioners … They had doubtless relied on that of Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goldwater v. Commissioner

    21 B.T.A. 73 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 16, 1930

    See also Phillips v. Commissioner, 42 Fed. (2d) 177. … Brown & Co., 9 B. T. A. 753; affd., Blair v. Brown Co., 30 Fed. (2d) 1008; Hutchinson Co., 14 B. T. A. 367; and D. E. Wheeler, 16 B. T. A. 96. See also United States v. Updike, 1 Fed. (2d) 550; affd., Updike v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Crispin B. Untalan v. R. James Nicholson

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 21, 2006

    See 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990). … Winslow v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 469, 471 (1996). In this case, Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Edward L. Engelhardt v. Claude I. Judd, Alexander E. Drukker and John H. Biel

    369 F.2d 408 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 15, 1966

    A similar statement is found in the subsequent case of Brown v. … In stark contrast to the situations in the Brown v. Childs and Rhinevault v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Captain Ross E. Joslyn v. United States

    110 Fed. Cl. 372 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 10, 2013

    Brown v. United States, 30 Fed. Cl. 227, 231 (1993), aff’d, 26 F.3d 139 (Fed. Cir. 1994) (unpublished table decision). III. Discussion A. … Brown, 184 Ct.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • 09-44 544

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 31, 2017

    See Grottveit v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 91, 93 (1993). … Colvin v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 171 (1991); Willis v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 66 (1991).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Larry E. English v. Robert L. Wilkie

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 1, 2018

    However, even in the context of such deferential review, the Court reviews questions of law without deference to the Board. See Butts v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 538 (1993) (en banc). … See 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 57 (1990).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. General Hide & Skin Corp.

    11 Ct. Cust. 78 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 23, 1921

    The Board of General Appraisers considered that the case of Kwong Yuen Shing v. United States ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 16 ; T. … —Brown & Co. v. United States ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 415 ; T. D. 35977); Neuman v. United States ( 4 Ct. Cust. Appls. 64 ; T. D. 33310); Chew Hing Lung v. Wise ( 176 U. S., 156 ).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Tinnerman v. Kost

    127 F.2d 532 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 27, 1942

    Then what, if anything, did you do with respect to making fasteners for The Corcoran-Brown Company? A. … Sincerely yours, The Corcoran Brown Lamp Co., R. Bogart, Chief Impeotor.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sanders v. West

    13 Vet. App. 491 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 9, 2000

    Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990) (quoting SEC v. Chenery, 332 U.S. 194, 196-97 (1947)). In this case, the Court is uncertain as to the precise theory underlying the Board's action. … See also Esteban v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 259, 261-62 (1994) (veteran entitled to separate ratings where none of the symptomatology for any one condition duplicates, or overlaps others).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • West Town State Bank v. Commissioner

    32 B.T.A. 531 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 30, 1935

    Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, 282 U. S. 283 ; Helvering v. Independent Life Insurance Co., 292 U. S. 371 . … Johnston v. United States, 17 Ct. Cls. 157; Jackson v. United States, 20 Ct. Cls. 298. The respondent may have judgment for the amount of the deficiency as increased. Beviewed by the Board.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jennifer Brown v. Department of Agriculture

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 18, 2026

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD JENNIFER NICOLE BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, PH-315H-24-0005-I-1 v. … Starkey, 2024 MSPB 6, ¶ 16 n.4; Green-Brown v. Department of Defense, 118 M.S.P.R. 327, ¶ 5 (2012).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.