disapproving recognition where the applicant organization failed to sufficiently apprise the Board of its intended operating structure
How later courts described this case
- disapproving recognition where the applicant organization failed to sufficiently apprise the Board of its intended operating structure
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Interim Decision #3132
MATTER OF LUTHERAN MINISTRIES OF FLORIDA
Request for Recognition
Decided by Board February 27, 1990
The application of a nonprofit organization seeking recognition under 8 C.F.R.
§ 292.2(a) (1989) should include detailed information as to how the organization will
operate and by whom it will be staffed, as well as other evidence regarding the
organization's qualifications such as resumes for the staff members and information as
to the availability of legal resource materials, training programs in immigration law and
procedure, and supervised employment for the staff.
BY: Milhollan, Chairman; Dunne, Morris, Vacca, and Heilman, Board Members;
Brown, Temporary Board Member
An application, on Form G-27 (Request for Recognition as a Non-
Profit Religious, Charitable, Social Service, or Similar Organization
Established in the United States under 8 CFR 292.2), was submitted
by the Lutheran Ministries of Florida, requesting recognition under 8
§ 292.2(a) (1989). In conjunction with the application for
recognition, this organization also seeks accreditation of Danielle E.
Kearney as its accredited representative. The application for recogni-
tion will be disapproved.
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 292.2(a) (1989), a nonprofit religious,
charitable, social service, or similar organization established in the
United States may be recognized by the Board of Immigration
Appeals. Such an organization must establish to the satisfaction of the
Board that it makes only nominal charges, assesses no excessive
membership dues for persons given assistance, and has at its disposal
adequate knowledge, information, and experience in immigration law
and procedure.
According to 8 C.F.R. § 292.2(b) (1989), an organization seeking
recognition must file an application with the Board, along with proof
of service of a copy of the application on the appropriate district
director) The district director has 30 days to submit a recommenda-
tion to the Board, or to request a specified period of time in which to
conduct an investigation or otherwise obtain relevant information
1 In the instant case, the application for recognition was served on the district director
rather than with the Board as required by 8 C.F.R. § 292.2(b) (1989).
185
Interim Decision #3132
regarding the applicant. In the instant case, the Immigration and
Naturalization Service does not oppose the application for recognition.
Lutheran Ministries of Florida, hereafter referred to as the "appli-
cant," has submitted in support of its Form G-27 its amended articles
of incorporation, proof of its tax exempt status, and a listing of legal
resource materials available to the organization. The applicant also
submitted a resume for Danielle E. Kearney and two reference letters
for Ms. Kearney.
Based upon our review of the applicant's submissions, we find the
applicant has not demonstrated that it has at its disposal adequate
knowledge, information, and experience in all aspects of immigration
law and procedure, including the visa petition process, exclusion, and
deportation. The general information provided by the applicant does
not sufficiently apprise us of how the organization will operate and by
whom it will be staffed. The information furnished by the applicant
indicates that the proposed representative's training and the organiza-
tion's experience have focused primarily on the Immigration Reform
and Control Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-603, 100 Stat. 3359. Even
though the applicant has indicated the availability of some legal
resource materials and training programs in immigration law and
procedure, none of the training programs has been specifically
identified. Also, it is not shown that the applicant's staff has ready
access to the Immigration and Nationality Act, Title 8 of the United
States Code, Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and the
Administrative Decisions Under the Immigration and Nationality
Laws of the United States. Furthermore, there is no indicatimi that
there is supervised employment for its staff members. The applicant
has not provided resumes for any of its staff other than for the
proposed representative. The applicant should provide more detailed
information as to how its organization will operate and whether it will
be staffed only by the proposed representative. Further, the applicant
must demonstrate that it makes only nominal charges and assesses no
excessive membership dues for the persons given assistance. See
Matter of American Paralegal Academy, Inc., 19 I&N Dec. 386 (BIA
1986).
Also, we must paint out that recognition of an organization does not
authorize the applicant's representatives to practice before the Board
or the Service. Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 292.2(d) (1989), an organization
recognized under S C.F.R. § 292.2(a) (1989) may apply for accredita-
tion of persons of good moral character to act as its representatives.
Any such application should be filed with the Board, along with proof
of service of a copy of the application on the appropriate district
director.
Accordingly, the application for recognition will be disapproved.
186
Interim Decision #3132
This denial is without prejudice to the submission of a new recognition
application with additional information. As the application for
recognition is disapproved, we need not consider the qualifications of
the individual for whom accreditation is requested.
ORDER: The application for recognition is disapproved.
187