Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.29s
71 T.C. 328 · United States Tax Court · Dec 4, 1978
In 1970 petitioners returned to the United States and established residency in Connecticut. … At issue was whether section 933(1) prohibited the deduction of these moving expenses which otherwise qualified for deduction under section 217.
Cited 2 timesPublished81 T.C. 141 · United States Tax Court · Aug 23, 1983
Adelaide, Amory, Jr., and James were contingent beneficiaries of Elisabeth’s Trust when it was established upon the death of Alanson B. … (b) Qualified Disclaimer Defined. — For purposes of subsection (a), the term "qualified disclaimer” means an irrevocable and unqualified refusal by a person to accept an interest in property but only if— (1) such refusal
Cited 2 timesPublished9 Pa. D. & C. 779 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · May 24, 1927
No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. . . .” In the case of Com. v. … Section 17 requires a new certificate for each “establishment” in which the minor works.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGoodson-Todman Enterprises, Ltd. v. Commissioner
84 T.C. 255 · United States Tax Court · Feb 25, 1985
TTTT clearly was a game show within the ordinary understanding of that genre of show, albeit with its own unique emphasis and format. … Petitioner’s market was clearly not limited to one particular television station.
Cited 12 timesPublishedA & S Council Oil Co. v. United States
35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,656 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 28, 1989
No mitigating procedure was available under the program to modify the FMP once a qualified entity accepted a section 8(a) subcontract from SBA. … by any such qualified businesses. .
Cited 7 timesPublished25 T.C. 513 · United States Tax Court · Dec 16, 1955
However, the fact that an expenditure is directly related to the production of income does not automatically qualify it as deductible. … Comeaux, supra, involve the deductibility of wages paid to employees in an illegal bookmaking establishment, the instant case is clearly distinguishable.
Reversed by Sam Mesi v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 242 F.2d 558 (1957)Cited 10 timesPublishedPulver Roofing Co. v. Commissioner
70 T.C. 1001 · United States Tax Court · Sep 19, 1978
It is equally clear that such a revocation will not be disturbed unless respondent has. abused his discretion, and we are clearly precluded from using a standard for decision which would impose on petitioner only the usual … However, we are of the opinion that Lansons cannot fairly be read as articulating an absolute rule of law that a plan once qualified under section 401(a)(3)(B) remains qualified irrespective of any change in circumstances
Cited 22 timesPublishedVolkswagen of America, Inc. v. United States
484 F. Supp. 2d 1314 · United States Court of International Trade · Mar 28, 2007
warranty repair cost, (17) qualifying warranty overhead cost, (18) total qualifying warranty cost. … Volkswagen has already successfully established that it contracted for “defect-free” merchandise.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMarilee Brown v. Department of the Interior
2014 MSPB 40 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 4, 2014
The reasonableness of the appellant’s removal should be based solely on the medical evidence which, in this case, clearly established her physical inability to perform. ¶19 Generally, in instances where … were jobs for which she could not qualify in light of her medical restrictions.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouthern California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United States
52 Fed. Cl. 444 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 25, 2002
Motion to Intervene RCFC Rule 24, which establishes intervention requirements, distinguishes between intervention of right and permissive intervention. … For purposes of this discussion, precision requires that the distinction between these ideas be clearly drawn.
Cited 14 timesPublishedBanfi Products Corp. v. United States
40 Fed. Cl. 107 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 26, 1997
The hearing officer qualified Dr. Flamm as an expert in toxicology and food safety. According to Dr. … Also, the plaintiff cannot escape the fact that two Riunite wines, Rosato and Lambrusco dell' Emilia, contained DEG in quantities that clearly are a potential health hazard.
Cited 9 timesPublishedHousing Authority of the City of Slidell
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 27, 2020
In sum, the FAC clearly alleges a contract with the government. … Rep. at 3 n.1, and, in any event, the FAC and the documents filed with the Court clearly establish that the HACS ACC is a government contract. See ECF Nos. 20-1, 20-2, 28-1, 29-1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGravenstein 116, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 30, 2026
his Court should consider the meaningful distinction between the ERC, refundable portion[s] of which acts as a non-tax refund of wages paid by an eligible employer, and the types of credits and deductions section 280E clearly … Contrary to Plaintiff’s argument, it is well-established that refundable tax credits are still tax credits subject to restrictions in the Internal Revenue Code.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRhinoCorps Ltd. v. United States
87 Fed. Cl. 481 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 15, 2009
(FAR) § 52.219-6 (2000), setting aside acquisitions for qualifying small businesses. … The Federal Circuit has prescribed the factual showing that will qualify a protestor as an interested party. A plaintiff seeking to establish standing as an actual bidder must have bid or made an offer. Rex Serv.
Cited 29 timesPublished90 Fed. Cl. 107 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2009
The Tucker Act provides the waiver of sovereign immunity necessary to sue the United States for money damages, but a plaintiff must establish an independent substantive right to money damages from the United States, that … The years 1968, 1976, and 1985 are all clearly outside of the six-year statute of limitations.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMotor Vehicle Operator Information
72 Pa. D. & C.2d 302 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · Aug 7, 1975
The reports clearly contain information ‘bearing on a consumer’s . . . character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living’, and when they are used ‘as a factor in establishing the consumer’s eligibility … and follow procedures assuring maximum possible accuracy of information (section 607(b), 15 U.S.C. §1681e(b)); restrict access to reports to qualified users and qualified purposes (section 607, 15 U.S.C. §1681e(a)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDepartment of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · Aug 10, 2005
(In prior rounds, Congress left with the Secretary discretion to establish the selection criteria. Id. § 2903(b).) … It imposes strict deadlines on various Executive Branch actors and on Congress; establishes and limits the criteria on which the Secretary may rely in preparing his list of recommendations; establishes and limits the criteria
Cited 0 timesPublishedMaximum Group Insurance Limits
13 Pa. D. & C.2d 395 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · Sep 9, 1957
It should be noted that insured persons under group life insurance plans receive preferential treatment *397 over the individually insured person both as to physically qualifying for insurance and in the cost of such insurance … a person were permitted to increase the amount of insurance applicable to him by basing it upon outside income, he would be effectually removing himself from the group for the purposes of insurance, as group membership clearly
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 26, 2024
The Tucker Act’s six-year statute of limitations is “jurisdictional,” as it limits the government’s waiver of sovereign immunity, and the court must consider the timeliness of a claim even if neither party raises it. … Nicholas’s claims clearly fall out- side this court’s jurisdiction for the multiple reasons described above. Thus, the court will not appoint counsel for Mr. Nicholas. D. Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGreene v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 29, 2019
Literature filed in this case relating to brachial neuritis, and the reports and testimony discussing it, clearly establishes that it is a neurologic injury primarily to the nerve axon—a finding confirmed by nerve electrophysiologic … The same goes for the Japanese case studies offered to establish that brachial neuritis has been successfully treated with the kind of immune-modulating treatments long understood to be effective for GBS.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna