Case law

Edward E. Meedel v. Eric K. Shinseki

23 Vet. App. 277 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 4, 2009

Brown, 7 Vet.App. 379, 382 (1995) (awarding service connection for left-ear hearing loss and denying it for right-ear hearing loss); Hensley v. … In Hensley v. Brown, the Board denied the appellant service connection for bilateral hearing loss. The Court discussed § 3.385 and § 4.85 and the role of averages in these regulations.

Carolyn K. Holle v. Robert A. McDonald

28 Vet. App. 112 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 10, 2016

(quoting Smith v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1525 (Fed. Cir. 1994))). In the decision on appeal, the Board properly articulated and applied the legal standard set forth in sections 1781(d)(1)(A) and (B). … See Taylor v. West, 11 Vet.App. 436, 440 (1998); Moffitt v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 214, 225 (1997). The Court notes that the Secretary, in appropriate cases, may provide equitable relief. See 38 U.S.C. § 503; Zimick v.

United States v. Boston Paper Board Co.

23 C.C.P.A. 372 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 23, 1936

Tower & Sons v. United States, 21 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 417, T. … United States v. Porto Rico Coal Co., 17 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 288, T. D. 43716. In the case of United States v.

Brown v. Commissioner

64 T.C.M. 20 · United States Tax Court · Jul 7, 1992

BROWN AND ELOISE S. BROWN, ET AL., 1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Brown v. … Gregory v. Helvering , supra at 469 . In Frank Lyon Co. v.

Jeffrey T. Petitti v. Robert A. McDonald

27 Vet. App. 415 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 28, 2015

Pacheco v. Gibson, 27 Vet.App. 21, 25 (2014); Johnson v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 369, 371 (1996). … See generally DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 202, 204-08 (1995); Schafrath v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 589, 591-93 (1991).

Hibbard v. West

13 Vet. App. 546 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 7, 2000

Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp., 486 U.S. 800, 818 (1988); see also Prenzler v. Derwinski, 928 F.2d 392 (Fed. Cir. 1991); Skinner v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 2 (1990). … West v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 329 (1995), overruled on other grounds, Barrera v. Gober, 122 F.3d 1030 (Fed.

Francis M. Jackson v. Eric K. Shinseki

26 Vet. App. 460 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 6, 2014

to the [v]eteran due to the [v]eteraris death.” … See Taylor v. West, 11 Vet.App. 436, 440 (1998); Moffitt v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 214, 225 (1997); Schleis v.

Joseph Martinak v. R. James Nicholson

21 Vet. App. 447 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 23, 2007

See Marciniak v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 198, 201 (1997) (stating that the appellant must allege "with specificity any prejudice" that results from an alleged procedural error); cf. Moore v. … See 38 U.S.C. 7104(d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990).

In re McKaughan

148 F.2d 1021 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 9, 1945

The Board of Appeals approved the examiner’s statement with regard to the disclosure in the Brown patent. … We are of opinion, therefore, that claim 11 reads directly on the patent to Brown. For the reasons stated, the decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed.

Everett Emerson v. Robert A. McDonald

28 Vet. App. 200 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 10, 2016

Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990). … Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (table).

Michael Seri v. R. James Nicholson

21 Vet. App. 441 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 22, 2007

Brown, 6 Vet.App. 277, 281 (1994); see Fenderson v. West, 12 Vet.App. 119, 132 (1999), or in referring, rather than remanding, a claim to the RO, see Manlincon v. … Gober, 10 Vet.App. 531, 535-36 (1997); Degmetich v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 208, 209 (1995), aff'd 104 F.3d 1328 (Fed.Cir.1997).

Hermetic Seal Products Co., P. R. v. Renegotiation Board

41 T.C. 223 · United States Tax Court · Nov 15, 1963

In support of this contention, the petitioner cites Beers v. … See Dario Sanchez v. United States, 256 F. 2d 73 (C.A. 1, 1958); and Carrion v. Gonzales, 125 F. Supp. 819 (D. P.R. 1954).

Lockheed Martin Corporation

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jan 2, 2014

Mayer Brown LLP Washington, DC APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. … of Lockheed Martin Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

Juarez v. Principi

16 Vet. App. 518 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 13, 2002

See Ford v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 531, 535-36 (1997) (holding that claims presented to BVA and not pursued on appeal are considered abandoned); Grivois v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 136, 138 (1994); Bucklinger v. … Brown, 5 Vet.App. 435, 436 (1993).

Alleman v. Principi

16 Vet. App. 253 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 21, 2002

This issue is a question of law, and therefore the Board’s decision in this matter is reviewed by this Court de novo. See Pappalardo v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 63, 64 (1993). … In Gardner v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 584 (1991), aff'd sub nom. Gardner v. Brown, 5 F.3d 1456 (Fed.Cir.1993), aff'd sub nom Brown v.

Cassett v. United States

2 Ct. Cust. 465 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 23, 1912

See also Schoellkopf v. United States (71 Fed. Rep., 694). Ammonium ich.tb.yol sulphonate is an oily substance. … The decision of the board is reversed.

Nord v. Gober

10 Vet. App. 442 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 20, 1997

Grivois v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 100, 101 (1994). The EAJA statute uses neither “filed” nor “received” when discussing EAJA applications. … See Bowers v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 25, 27-28 (1995). The Court has consistently held that the EAJA 30-day filing deadline is to be strictly enforced and may not be waived. See Bazalo v.

Smith v. Principi

14 Vet. App. 297 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 22, 2001

See also Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed.Cir.1996) (expressly agreeing with this Court’s Landicho holding). … It also nullifies the previous merits adjudication by the RO because that decision was subsumed in the Board decision. See Yoma v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 298 (1995) (per curiam order) (relying on Robinette v.

Kenneth B. Mason v. R. James Nicholson

20 Vet. App. 279 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 16, 2006

Principi, 18 Vet.App. 204, 210 (2004), Cottle v. Principi, 14 Vet.App. 329, 335 (2001), and Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 426, 429 (1994)). … See 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(2); see also Marciniak v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 198, 201 (1997) (holding that, "[i]n the absence of demonstrated prejudice," remand unnecessary); Parker v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 476, 481 (1996) (same).

Bhate Environmental Associates, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Sep 19, 2017

Browning, Esq. Jack G. Kowalski, Esq. … ofBhate Environmental Associates, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.