Case law

In re Herschler

591 F.2d 693 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 1, 1979

or Brown. … Weil v. Fritz, 572 F.2d 856 , 196 USPQ 600 (Cust. & Pat.App.1978); In re Schmidt, 293 F.2d 274 , 48 CCPA 1140, 130 USPQ 404 (1961).

In re Waldron

40 F.2d 569 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 26, 1930

A., and Gowen and Bradford v. Arnold, 17 C. C. P. A. 783, 37 F (2d) 430. … Claim 4 is unpatentable for the reasons stated by the Board of Appeals. The decision is affirmed.

Frank v. United States

2 Ct. Cust. 85 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 22, 1911

The board heard the protest upon evidence and overruled the same, which ruling is now presented to this court for review. … Enamel v. 2. Enamel (v.): 2. In various extended uses: a. To apply a vitreous glaze by fusion to (surfaces of any kind, e. g., pottery). Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia: Enamel (n.): 1.

First Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

19 B.T.A. 744 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 28, 1930

Witness Chandler, chairman of petitioner’s board of directors, states that Brown-Crummer’s transactions in bonds amounted to, at times, $5,000,000 to $6,000,000, and that “ we asked them to let us have them,” inasmuch as … Peugh v. Davis, 96 U. S. 332 ; Jackson v. Lawrence, 117 U. S. 679 ; Morris v. Nixon, 1 How. 117 ; and see also Russell v. Southard, 12 How. 139 .

Arnold C. Kyhn v. Eric K. Shinseki

23 Vet. App. 335 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 15, 2010

See 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert, 1 Vet.App. at 56-57. Mr. … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 218, 220 (1994) (when issue is not reasonably raised, Board is not required to "conduct an exercise in prognostication"), with Carpenter v.

Bent v. Commissioner

87 T.C. 236 · United States Tax Court · Jul 28, 1986

Seay v. Commissioner, supra. In Mitchum v. … Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 ; McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 ; Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 ; Zwickler v. Koota, 389 U.S. 241, 245-249 ; H.

PAE Applied Technologies LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 24, 2023

Sys. v. United States, 778 F.3d 1000, 1005 (Fed. Cir. 2015); Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 22-1 BCA ¶ 37,974 at 184,427. … Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 22-1 BCA ¶ 37,974 at 184,428; see also Placeway Constr. Corp. v. United States, 920 F.2d 903, 907 (Fed.

12-21 767

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2015

App. 268 (1998) where Board's remand instructions were substantially complied with); Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet. … The Board concludes, therefore, that a decision on the merits at this time does not violate the VCAA, nor prejudice the appellant under Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384 (1993).

OBD Insaat Taahhut Turizm

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Apr 10, 2018

Mayer Brown LLP Washington, DC APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas J. Warren, Esq. … of OBD Insaat Taahhut Turizm, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

Brown v. Commissioner

65 T.C.M. 2960 · United States Tax Court · Jun 15, 1993

RANDALL AND BETTY BROWN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Brown v. Commissioner Docket No. 26778-91 United States Tax Court T.C. Memo 1993-263 ; 1993 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 265 ; 65 T.C.M. … For pro se: Randall Brown. For respondent: John J. Boyle.

James L. Parrish v. Eric K. Shinseki

24 Vet. App. 391 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 22, 2011

Brown, 9 Vet.App. 425, 433 (1996), and its overall statement “must be adequate to enable a claimant to understand the precise basis for the Board’s decision, as well as to facilitate review in this Court.” Allday v. … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 429, 433 (1995) (Board’s assignment of greater probative weight to one medical opinion than to another is subject to the “clearly erroneous” standard of review); see also Russo v.

Cotant v. Principi

17 Vet. App. 116 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 6, 2003

See Crowe v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 238, 247 (1994) (citing Bagby v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 225, 227 (1991); see also Miller v. … The clear-and-unmistakable-evidence standard is an "onerous" one, Laposky v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 331, 334 (1993) (citing Akins v.

Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A. v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 158 · United States Customs Court · Oct 28, 1954

Brown for the account of Peyton Packing Co. of El Paso, Tex. At the trial, plaintiffs called 17 witnesses and the defendant 9. … In Commonwealth v.

Young v. Commissioner

16 B.T.A. 1428 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 25, 1929

See Howard v. Commissioner, 29 Fed. (2d) 895. … Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, supra.

Brown v. Commissioner

61 T.C.M. 2849 · United States Tax Court · Jun 10, 1991

BROWN AND JOANNA BROWN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Brown v. Commissioner Docket No. 30801-88 United States Tax Court T.C. Memo 1991-260 ; 1991 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 308 ; 61 T.C.M. … Brown also was a director, officer, and salesman of Cate Equipment.

Brown v. Commissioner

61 T.C.M. 2832 · United States Tax Court · Jun 6, 1991

JOSEPH BROWN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Brown v. Commissioner Docket No. 3943-90 United States Tax Court T.C. Memo 1991-255 ; 1991 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 298 ; 61 T.C.M. (CCH) 2832 ; T.C.M. … Brown in 1987.

Heart & Core LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Feb 1, 2023

Heart & Core had elected to conduct the appeal under the Board’s Rule 12.2, Small Claims (Expedited) procedure and the parties agreed to brief the matter under Board Rule 11. … Kellogg Brown & Root Servs, Inc., ASBCA Nos. 57530, 58161, 19-1 BCA ¶ 37,321 at 181,535.

Kevin J. Rosenberg v. Gordon H. Mansfield

22 Vet. App. 1 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 28, 2007

The Board further found that it had no legal authority to grant an equitable award of Chapter 30 educational benefits. R. at 9 (citing Harvey v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 416, 425 (1994)). II. … Brown, 9 Vet.App. 369, 371 (1996) (When “ ‘the plain meaning of a statute is discernible, that “plain meaning must be given effect.” ’ ” (quoting Tollman v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 453, 460 (1995))); Smith v.

12-27 051

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 28, 2017

As such, the Board finds that there has been substantial compliance with the January 2014 Board remand. See Dyment v. West, 13 Vet. App. 141, 146-47 (1999) (remand not required under Stegall v. West, 11 Vet. … Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49, 55 (1990). The Board notes that it has reviewed all the evidence in the record.

Brown v. Commissioner

1987 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 185 · United States Tax Court · May 6, 1987

BROWN, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Brown v. Commissioner Docket No.: 20695-85 United States Tax Court 1987 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 185 ; May 6, 1987 , Entered *185 L. W. Hamblen, Jr., Judge.