Case law

Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

197 F.2d 871 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 24, 1952

Considering the marks as a whole the examiner was of opinion that there is likelihood of confusion and mistake if the respective marks of the parties are used concurrently on like products, citing Auburn Rubber Corp. v. … Co. v. The Sitroux Co., Inc., 109 F.2d 445 , 27 C.C.P.A., Patents, 858.

Canadian Wheat Board v. United States

491 F. Supp. 2d 1234 · United States Court of International Trade · Apr 24, 2007

Slip Op. 07-61 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE : CANADIAN WHEAT BOARD, : : Plaintiff, : … Eaton, Judge: This matter is before the court on the Canadian Wheat Board’s (“CWB”) motion for a preliminary injunction pursuant to USCIT Rule 65(a).

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 2, 2024

Moran * v. … Brown did so. Pet’r’s Memo., filed June 26, 2023. The Secretary contended that Ms. Brown did not meet the reasonable basis standard. Resp’t’s Memo., filed July 21, 2023. Ms. Brown defended her position.

De Los Reyes v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 548 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 16, 1993

Frankel v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 23, 25-26 (1990). The Secretary’s motion will be granted and the decision of the Board affirmed. … Proscelle v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 629, 632 (1992). Hence, in the instant case, the Board was not required to order a current medical examination.

Joseph H. Brown & Son v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 361 · United States Customs Court · Mar 7, 1962

Joseph H. Brown & Son v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 393 · United States Customs Court · Mar 29, 1962

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States

109 Fed. Cl. 288 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 22, 2013

MILLER, Judge On June 8, 2012, plaintiff, Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. … The AFEB recommends an award fee to the AFDO after each board review.”).

Joseph H. Brown & Son v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 393 · United States Customs Court · Mar 29, 1962

Joseph H. Brown & Son v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 364 · United States Customs Court · Mar 8, 1962

Joseph H. Brown & Son v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 364 · United States Customs Court · Mar 8, 1962

Joseph H. Brown & Son v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 366 · United States Customs Court · Mar 12, 1962

Michael J. Garsow v. Eric K. Shinseki

26 Vet. App. 348 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 30, 2013

Garsow’s appeal of the November 2011 Board decision. 2 See Hibbard, supra; see also Breeden v. … Brown, 10 Vet.App. 65, 66 (1997) (“[I]n order to attain prevailing-party status, a party is required to receive at least some relief on the merits of his claim.” (quoting Sumner v.

11-00 257

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Sep 30, 2015

See Browder v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 268, 271 (1993); Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 163 (1993). … See Routen v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 183, 189 n. 2 (1997); see also Verdon v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 529, 538 (1996).

Winfield Mfg. Co. v. Renegotiation Board

57 T.C. 439 · United States Tax Court · Dec 28, 1971

At the outset it should be pointed out, as was done in Martin Manufacturing Co. v. … In Martin Manufacturing Co. v.

Page-River-Curran v. Renegotiation Board

55 T.C. 1153 · United States Tax Court · Mar 31, 1971

Corp. v. … Corp. v. Renegotiation Board, supra.

Wells Marine, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board

54 T.C. 1189 · United States Tax Court · Jun 3, 1970

Arkansas Motor Coaches v. Commissioner, 199 F. 2d 189 (C.A. 8, 1952), reversing 28 T.C. 282 ; Central Paper Co. v. Commissioner, 199 F. 2d 902 (C.A. 6, 1952); and Detroit Automotive P. Corp. v. … See United States v. California Eastern Line, supra at 353-354 ; Charlson Realty Co. v. United States, supra.

Patricia L. Romero v. Dat P. Tran

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 25, 2021

Brown, 9 Vet.App. 195, 199 (1996); Chute v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 352, 353 (1991) (per curiam order); Schoolman v. West, 12 Vet.App. 307, 311 (1999)). 38 Id. … Godfrey v.

Brown v. District of Columbia

19 Ct. Cl. 445 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1884

company and the board. … On this point we. need only refer to the language of the *460 Supreme Court of the United States in Gould v. Evansville & C. R. R. Co. ( 91 U. S. R., 526 ), where it was held, (1.)

Hersey v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 91 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 21, 1992

Hersey, a veteran, appeals from an April 4, 1990, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) decision affirming the denial of entitlement to a total disability rating for compensation purposes based on individual unemployability due … United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364 , 68 S.Ct. 525, 542 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948); Brannon v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 314, 317 (1991); Spencer v.

09-45 350

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2015

The Board finds that all necessary development has been accomplished, and therefore appellate review may proceed without prejudice to the appellant. See Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384 (1993). … Watson v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 309, 314 (1993); see also Boyer v. West, 210 F.3d 1351, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2000).