Case law

D'Amato v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 481 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 8, 1993

Colvin v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 171, 174 (1991). … Oppenheimer v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 370, 371 (1991).

Sugar v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 265 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 23, 1993

In September 1968, a Physical Evaluation Board found him unfit for duty. … Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49 (1990).

Myers v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 3 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 2, 1993

Myers, appeals a May 11, 1992, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) insofar as it denied appellant entitlement to service connection for a psychiatric disorder and a back disorder. … See Myers v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 127 (1991). The Court has jurisdiction under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (a) (West 1991).

Adamski v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 242 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 16, 1993

On October 7, 1992, this Court issued an order consolidating the cases of Hamilton v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 671 , Contreras v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 275 , and Powell v. … Hamilton v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 528, 538-39 (1993).

Genous v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 422 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 12, 1993

Brown, 5 Vet.App. 11, 13 (1992) (mem. dec.) … Fisher v.

Brown v. Derwinski

3 Vet. App. 75 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 6, 1992

Brown, BVA 90-29738, at 4-5 (Jan. 31, 1991). … Brown, BVA 90-29738, at 5.

Jones v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 79 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 3, 1993

MANKIN, Associate Judge: Appellant appeals an October 4, 1991, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision which denied entitlement to an effective date earlier than December 4, 1987, for a grant of a permanent and … See Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (1990). The decision of the BVA is AFFIRMED.

Franko v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 502 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 9, 1993

Frankel v. Denuinski, 1 Vet.App. 23, 25-26 (1990). For the reasons set forth below, the Board’s decision will be partially affirmed and partially vacated and remanded for readjudication. I. … The Board is required to consider and discuss the applicability of all potentially applicable provisions of law. See Schafrath v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 589, 592-93 (1991); Payne v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 85, 87 (1990).

Alcaide v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 9 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 8, 1993

See Manio v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 140, 145 (1991); Jones (McArthur) v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 210, 215 (1991). … Although the Board failed to address the question of whether the claim should be reopened, its error was harmless in this case because the claim should not have been reopened. See Kehoskie v.

Tumaning v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 160 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 1, 1993

MEMORANDUM DECISION STEINBERG, Associate Judge: The pro se appellant, World War II veteran Severo Tumaning, appeals from a December 31, 1991, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) denying him a combined … Frankel v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 23, 25-26 (1990). Because the veteran has not presented a well-grounded claim, the Court will grant the Secretary's motion and affirm the Board’s decision.

Ennis v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 434 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 29, 1993

Manió v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 140, 145 (1991). The Board must first determine whether the evidence submitted since the prior denial of the claim is “new and material.” 38 U.S.C.A. § 5108 (West 1991). … Frankel v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 23, 25-26 (1990).

Latham v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 269 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 11, 1993

As this issue was not before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA), it cannot be a subject of this appeal. See Branham v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 93, 94 (1990).

Latham v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 255 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 12, 1993

KRAMER, Associate Judge: Appellant appeals a November 1, 1990, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) which denied him entitlement to payment of pension benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1505 (a) (West 1991) and 38 C.F.R … United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 442 , 85 S.Ct. 1707, 1711 , 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965).

Williams v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 200 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 12, 1993

Frankel v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 23, 25-26 (1990). … See Masors v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 181, 185 (1992); Jones (McArthur) v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 210, 213 (1991); Colvin, supra.

Brown v. Commissioner

9 B.T.A. 965 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 28, 1927

BROWN AND OTTO J. THOMEN. Brown v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 3110, 3364. United States Board of Tax Appeals 9 B.T.A. 965 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 2484 ; December 28, 1927 , Promulgated *2484 1. … See also Kerbaugh-Empire Co. v. Bowers, 271 U.S. 170 ; Appeal of Independent Brewing Co., 4 B.T.A. 870 .

Henderson v. West

12 Vet. App. 11 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 10, 1998

See Degmetich v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 208, 209 (1995), aff'd, 104 F.3d 1328 (Fed.Cir.1997); Bucklinger v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 435, 436 (1993). … See Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 533-34 (1995).

H. H. Brown Co. v. Commissioner

8 B.T.A. 112 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 19, 1927

See Sherwin v. Boston Five Cents Saving Bank, 137 Mass. 444 ; Cochran v. Guild, 106 Mass. 29, 30 ; Burr v. Wilcox, 13 Allen, 269 , 272; Wilson v. Shearer, 9 Met. 504 , 506; Sherwin v. Wigglesworth, 129 Mass. 64 . … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on Id days’ notice, wnder Bule SO.

United States Gypsum Co. v. Brown

137 F.2d 360 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 1943

Compare Gal-ban Lobo Co. v. Henderson, Em.App.1942, 132 F.2d 150, 152 . … Bank v. Brown, 137 F.2d 228 . There is likewise no merit in complainant’s contention that by this order the Administrator was seeking to control business practices in violation of the act.

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 168 · United States Customs Court · Apr 10, 1958

The substance of his testimony follows: He is vice president of Brown Boveri Corp., the importer, is an electrical engineer, and supervises the operation of the electrical division of the corporation. … In Federal Electric Products Co. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 47 , C.

Victor B. Skaar v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 6, 2019

Cir. 1998) (our Court's "jurisdiction is premised on and defined by the Board's decision concerning the matter being appealed"); Wick v. Brown (In re Wick), 40 F.3d 367, 373 (Fed. … See 38 U.S.C. §§ 7252, 7261(c); see also Owens v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 429, 433 (1995) (holding that the Board is responsible for assessing the credibility and weight of evidence). b.