Opinion

Latham v. Brown

  • 4 Vet. App. 269
  • 1993 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 97
  • 1993 WL 76201
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Mar 11, 1993
Status
Published
On the bench
Holdaway, Kramer, Nebeker
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.1%

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Shortly before the Court issued its decision in this case, appellant filed an addendum request predicated on grounds different from those which were originally appealed to the Court as discussed in the Court’s decision of February 12, 1992. In essence, appellant argues that he is entitled to pension based on the needs of his family. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.666 (a) (1992). As this issue was not before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA), it cannot be a subject of this appeal. See Branham v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 93, 94 (1990).

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the addendum is stricken and the Clerk is to return it to appellant.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.