Case law

Brown v. Board of Trustees Sealy Independent School District

871 F. Supp. 2d 581 · District Court, S.D. Texas · May 9, 2012

According to the Complaint, the Sealy ISD Board of Trustees (“Board”) was aware of Brown’s condition through Lechler, who also served as a trustee on the Board, but the Board did not give Brown any lesser sanction apart from … the SISD Board Defendants. v.

Brown v. Texas Liquor Control Board

54 F. Supp. 350 · District Court, W.D. Texas · Feb 14, 1944

Brown, National Price Administrator, seeking an injunction to restrain the Liquor Control Board of the State of Texas from selling or offering for sale alcoholic beverages belonging to the State of Texas. … , confiscated to the State of Texas and sold at judicial sale, and that the proceeds from the sale are made available to the Texas Liquor Control Board to be used by the Board for financing the administration of the laws

Graves v. Barnes

378 F. Supp. 640 · District Court, W.D. Texas · May 28, 1974

Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339 , 81 S.Ct. 125 , 5 L.Ed.2d 110 (1960); Taylor v. Board of Education, 294 F.2d 36 (2d Cir. 1961); United States v. State of Texas, 321 F.Supp. 1043, 1051-1052 (E.D.Tex.1970); Sims v. … The doctrine of “interposition” was apparently the theoretical brainchild of a legislative advisory committee appointed by Governor Shivers in 1955 in the wake of Brown v. Board of Education.

Brown v. Texas Board Of Pardons and Paroles

District Court, S.D. Texas · Dec 17, 2020

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-277 § TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND § PAROLES, § … Jd. at 1-2, n.1; Malchi v. Thaler, 211 F.3d 953, 959 (5th Cir. 2000). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C.

Bell v. Philadelphia International Records

981 F. Supp. 2d 621 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Oct 22, 2013

Lyle v. Jane Guinn Revocable Trust, 365 S.W.3d 341, 355 (Tex.App. … .; Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. Horwood, 58 S.W.3d 732, 734 (Tex.2001).

Sapp v. MHI Partnership, Ltd.

199 F. Supp. 2d 578 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Apr 15, 2002

Defendants first contend that under McNeil v. … Defendants seem to be putting forth a variation on the separate-but-equal approach not viable since Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954).

Miller v. Smith

431 F. Supp. 821 · District Court, N.D. Texas · May 11, 1977

As the opinion in Monroe v. … See, for example, Ortiz v. LaVallee, 442 F.2d 912 (2nd Cir., 1971) and Ney v. State of California, 439 F.2d 1285 (9th Cir., 1971). 16 . Knowles v. Carson, 419 F.2d 369, 371 (5th Cir., 1969). 17 . Jones v.

Council

District Court, N.D. Texas · Jan 14, 2026

Yumilicious Franchise, L.L.C. v. Barrie, 819 F.3d 170, 176 (5th Cir. 2016) (citing Fulton v. Hecht, 580 F.2d 1243, 1248 n.2 (5th Cir. 1978)); see also Arruda v. Curves Int’l, Inc., 861 F. … No. 5 at 6 (quoting Rich v. Palko, 920 F.3d 288, 293- 94 (5th Cir. 2019) (cleaned up; quoting Brown v. Miller, 519 F.3d 231, 236 (5th Cir. 2008))).)

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Henderson

849 F. Supp. 495 · District Court, E.D. Texas · Apr 11, 1994

Henderson falsified board of director minutes, it does not appear that the FDIC is stating a claim for fraud. The Fifth Circuit and three district courts recently rendered six decisions in similar cases. RTC v. … Do you find, from a preponderance of the evidence, that a majority of the board of directors adversely dominated Southland Savings from 1984 to August 18, 1986? V. TEXAS HOUSE BILL 1076 As in FDIC v.

Brown v. Ballas

331 F. Supp. 1033 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Jun 9, 1971

Miller v. International Paper Co., 408 F.2d 283 , 387 n. 18 (5th Cir. 1969). … Harris v. Orkin Exterminating Co., 293 F.Supp. 104, 105 (N.D.Ga.1968).

Brown v. Carr

236 F.R.D. 311 · District Court, S.D. Texas · May 22, 2006

See Pedraza v. Jones, 71 F.3d 194 , 196 n. 4 (5th Cir.1995); Hodge v. Prince, 730 F.Supp. 747, 751 (N.D.Tex.1990), aff'd mem. 923 F.2d 853 (5th Cir.1991). … See Tajeddini v. Gluch, 942 F.Supp. 772, 782 (D.Conn.1996) (“In forma pauperis status does not require the Government to advance funds to pay for deposition expenses.”); Fernandez v.

Brown v. Carr

253 F.R.D. 410 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Sep 23, 2008

See Brown v. Carr, 236 F.R.D. 311, 312 (S.D.Tex.2006) (citing Cressler v. Neuenschwander, 170 F.R.D. 20, 21 (D.Kan.1996)). … Brown, 236 F.R.D. at 312 (citations omitted). Generally, leave to take depositions by remote electronic means should be granted liberally. See Jahr v.

Douglass v. Beakley

900 F. Supp. 2d 736 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Oct 24, 2012

See, e.g., Corwin, D.D.S. v. … Hoggett v. Brown, 971 S.W.2d 472, 488 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, pet. denied). However, whether an informal fiduciary relationship exists is typically a question of fact. See, e.g., Kaspar v.

Wilemon v. Brown

51 F. Supp. 978 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Sep 29, 1943

LaFranca, 282 U.S. 568 , 51 S.Ct. 278 , 75 L.Ed. 551 ; O’Sullivan v. Felix, 233 U.S. 318 , 34 S.Ct. 596 , 58 L.Ed. 980 ; Simon Hardware Company v. … We must find that it acted constitutionally, if possible, and lay the blame where it belongs, to-wit, on the “Board.”

United States v. Integracare Home Health Services, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Texas · Oct 21, 2024

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. … Longhi v. Lithium Power Tech. Inc., 575 F.3d 458, 467 (5th Cir. 2009) (adopting the requirements of United States ex rel. Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 376 (4th Cir.2008)).

Brown v. Johnson

373 F. Supp. 973 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Apr 5, 1974

Simons v. Vinson, 394 F.2d 732 (5th Cir. 1968). With two exceptions, not relevant here, Dugan v. … Malone v. Bowdoin, 369 U.S. 643 , 82 S.Ct. 980 , 8 L.Ed.2d 168 (1962); Rambo v. United States, 145 F.2d 670 (5th Cir. 1944).

Brown v. O'Connor

49 F. Supp. 973 · District Court, N.D. Texas · May 14, 1943

This act in its entirety has been held constitutional in Brown v. Wick, D.C., 48 F.Supp. 887 ; Henderson v. Kimmel, D.C. , 47 F.Supp. 635 ; Dieffenbaugh v. Cook, D.C., 47 F.Supp. 645 . In United States v. C. … In Roach v.

Brown v. Livingston

17 F. Supp. 3d 616 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Apr 30, 2014

The resulting governance, hereinafter referred to as “Brown v. Beto ” or “the Brown v. … The fact that the Brown v. Beto regime was abandoned only as a result of the Scott v.

Brown v. Estelle

468 F. Supp. 42 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Jul 7, 1978

Brown v. State, 535 S.W.2d 640 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). Petitioner presents two complaints in his application for Writ of Habeas Corpus relief now before this court. … Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, supra; Hull v. U. S., 324 F.2d 817 (9th Cir. 1963); Clayton v. State, 502 S.W.2d 755 (Tex.Cr.App.1973).

Brown v. Jones

407 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, W.D. Texas · Nov 4, 1974

For substantially the same reasons as outlined in Brown v. State, supra, the Court does not agree. … Brown v. Jones, 489 F.2d 1040 (5th Cir., 1974). 2 . The validity of this initial search is not contested by Brown and is not an issue in this case. 3 . Brown v. State, supra. 4 .