Case law

Brown v. Board of Education

47 F. Supp. 3d 665 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 15, 2014

Doe v. Catholic Bishop for Diocese of Memphis, 306 S.W.3d 712, 717 (Tenn.Ct.App.2008); see also Brown v. … Section 49-5-512 provides that “ ‘impartial’ means that the selected hearing officer shall have no history of employment with the board or director of schools, no relationship with any board member and no relationship with

Brown v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Chattanooga

722 F. Supp. 380 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 8, 1989

Brown, the black candidate, received 78.8% of the black vote. … Hudson; 1971 Hargraves v. Meyer v. O’Rear v. Parks; 1975 Cash v. Meacham; 1979 Brown v. Cox; 1982 McClarty v. Taylor v. Timberlake. 12 .

Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Wilson County School Board

747 F. Supp. 436 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 28, 1990

v. … V.

Brown v. Williamson County Board of Education

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Dec 16, 2020

Directv, Inc. v. Treesh, 487 F.3d 471, 476 (6th Cir. 2007); Inge v. Rock Fin. Corp., 281 F.3d 613, 619 (6th Cir. 2002). … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007).

Cousin v. McWherter

904 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 28, 1995

In addition, the Court takes judicial notice of racially polarized voting in Hamilton *700 County as set in the following charts which are Appendixes A, B, and C to Brown v. … Brown v. Board of Commissioners of Chattanooga, Tenn., 722 F.Supp. 380, 386 (E.D.Tenn.1989). In 1889 the general assembly enacted a series of laws designed to disfranchise blacks. Brown, supra at 386 .

Kelley v. METROPOLITAN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, TENN.

372 F. Supp. 540 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Dec 19, 1973

Supreme Court in ‘Swann v. Char *556 lotte-Meeklenburg Board of Education,’ and its companion cases. … Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 , 74 S.Ct. 693 98 L.Ed. 884 (1954). In the court’s opinion, these federal officials placed the Executive Branch of the federal government in violation of the mandate of Brown v.

Orlowski v. Bates

146 F. Supp. 3d 908 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 18, 2015

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir.1989). III. … Lopez v. Taylor, 195 S.W.3d 627, 634 (Tenn.Ct.App.2005), (citing Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc., 42 S.W.3d 62, 66 (Tenn.2001)).

Boyd v. James S. Hayes Living Health Care Agency, Inc.

671 F. Supp. 1155 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 13, 1987

Hayes’ in-corporators were MCH’s board chairman and corporate counsel. The MHC board selected the Hayes board, and MHC officials served on the Hayes board. MHC’s executive director was chairman of the board of Hayes. … The MHC board selects the Hayes board. The Hayes board chairman was the executive director of MHC.

Scott v. Forgey

District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 10, 2022

Hawks v. Jones, 105 F. Supp. 2d 718, 722 (E.D. Mich. 2000) (first citing Whittington v. Milby, 928 F.2d 188, 193 (6th Cir. 1991); then citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591 (6th Cir. 1989)). … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okla., v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997).

Gomez v. City of Memphis, Tennessee

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Apr 20, 2020

In re Knoxville News-Sentinel Co., Inc., 723 F.2d 470, 474 (6th Cir. 1983) (citing Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978)); see also Shane Grp., Inc. v. … (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1179 (6th Cir. 1983)) (internal quotation marks omitted)).

Taylor v. Brown

461 F. Supp. 559 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 27, 1978

See Buckles v. Morristown Kayo Co., 132 F.Supp. 555 (E.D. Tenn.1955); United States v. Ozark Air Lines, Inc., 419 F.Supp. 795 (E.D.Mo.1976). … United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, supra, at 726-27, 86 S.Ct. 1130 .

Rienholtz v. Campbell

64 F. Supp. 2d 721 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 28, 1999

See also Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369 , 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987). … Rimmer-Bey v. Brown, 62 F.3d 789, 790-91 (6th Cir.1995).

Doe v. Office of Inspector General (OIG)

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 29, 2025

Shane Grp., Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich., 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016) (first quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … (quoting Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1179).

Brown v. Alexander

516 F. Supp. 607 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 12, 1981

Plaintiffs in this action are Frank Brown, Silas Upchurch, and Rufus Turner, guards in the Tennessee prison system, their union, Local 1308 of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, and AFSCME … In Healy v.

Brown v. Carpenter

889 F. Supp. 1028 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 9, 1995

Plaintiff, Ricky Flamingo Brown, an inmate at the West Tennessee High Security Facility (WTHSF) in Henning, Tennessee, has filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . … See Cleavinger v. Saxner, 474 U.S. 193 , 106 S.Ct. 496 , 88 L.Ed.2d 507 (1985) (disciplinary board mem bers protected by qualified immunity); Superintendent v.

Brown v. Luna

735 F. Supp. 762 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Apr 26, 1990

See Shands v. Tull, 602 F.2d 1156, 1160 (3rd Cir.1979). … United States v. Miami, 664 F.2d 435 , 439-40 (5th Cir.1981).

Brown v. United States

630 F. Supp. 57 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 21, 1985

U.S. v. Boyle, 469 U.S. -, - n. 8, 105 S.Ct. 687 , 692 n. 8, 83 L.Ed.2d 622 , 630 n. 8 (1985). … In addition, the government contends that this case is controlled by United States v.

United States v. Brown

68 F. Supp. 3d 783 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Nov 12, 2014

Defendant Michael Mancil Brown’s Motion to Suppress Evidence, which incorporates a request for a hearing pursuant to Franks v. … Franks v.

Brown v. Raymond Corp.

318 F. Supp. 2d 591 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 4, 2004

In Jackson v. … Dec. 18, 2003); Brown v. Crown Equip. Corp., 2004 WL 350658 , at *1-2, *6-7 (Tenn.Ct.App.

Emrit v. Combs

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 9, 2025

Corp. v. Smith, 802 F. App’x 938, 945 (6th Cir. 2020) (citing Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)). But this “lenient treatment . . . has limits.” Pilgrim v. … (citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989))). Pro se plaintiffs must still plead enough “factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Barnett v.