Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.62s
United States v. Hernández-De La Rosa
606 F. Supp. 2d 175 · District Court, D. Puerto Rico · Feb 12, 2009
Crowe v. Marchand, 506 F.3d 13, 16 (1st Cir.2007). … Gray v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTrailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization
511 F. Supp. 553 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 3, 1981
This situation remained unchanged until the California Supreme Court ruled in August, 1980 in Board of Supervisors of San Diego v. … United States v. City and County of San Francisco, 310 U.S. 16, 30-31 , 60 S.Ct. 749, 756-757 , 84 L.Ed. 1050 (1940). Lathan v. Volpe, 455 F.2d 1111, 1116-17 (9th Cir. 1971); Sierra Club v.
Modified by Trailer Train Company, a Corporation and Railbox Company, a Corporation v. State Board of Equalization, 697 F.2d 860 (1983)Cited 10 timesPublishedThompson v. County School Board of Arlington County, Virginia
204 F. Supp. 620 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Mar 1, 1962
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 ; 2 . Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 . 3 . Carson v. … Boson v. Rippy, supra. 7 . See Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 873 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · Jul 16, 2020
Sawyer v. Gorman, 317 Fed.Appx. 725, 727 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12 (1991)). Plaintiff’s allegations against Defendant Brown show that his actions were taken in his judicial capacity. … See Stump v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · Oct 7, 2021
PETITIONER v. … See Reed v. Stephens, 739 F.3d 753, 767 (5th Cir. 2014); see also Davis v. Blackburn, 789 F.2d 350, 352 (5th Cir. 1986).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · Aug 1, 2022
(See id. at 4:00-4:30 (describing Plaintiff as a “mixed” race black male in his twenties named “Ray Brown” wearing a black shirt and blue jeans).) … Wright, 962 F.3d at 870 (citing Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 447, 462 (6th Cir. 2016)). Plaintiff does not directly contest that Officer Scaglione had probable cause to arrest Plaintiff. Nor can he.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDelaware, L. & W. Ry. Co. v. Johnson-Brown Co.
270 F. 679 · District Court, S.D. Georgia · Feb 10, 1921
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · Feb 12, 2021
Here, Brown argues the court erred when it determined that his habeas petition was a second or successive petition because his “first § 2254 filing (Brown v. … (See Filing No. 31 at CM/ECF pp. 3–4, Case No. 8:10CV236 (citing Barrett v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownInnes v. Board of Regents of the University System
29 F. Supp. 3d 566 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jul 1, 2014
There is thus no need to pursue a claim against Defendant[s] Brown and Hayer in their official capacities.” The same logic applies here. … v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · Sep 8, 2025
BROWN #464263, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:24-cv-77 v. … See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Mar 2, 2023
See Smith v. Dart, 803 F.3d 304, 309–10 (7th Cir. 2015) (quoting Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 535 (1979)). … See Lewis v. Stenz, 637 F. App'x 943, 944 (7th Cir. 2016).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Maryland · Jan 27, 2023
Nancy G. v. Kijakazi, No. GLS 20-3440, 2022 WL 363824, at *3 (D. Md. Feb. 4, 2022) (citing Thomas v. … Britt v. Saul, 860 F. Appx. 256, 262 (4th Cir. 2021).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · Sep 29, 2022
People v. Brown, No. 346401, 2019 WL 7206131, at *3 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 26, 2019). … See Darden v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownKucera v. Jefferson County Board of School Commissioners
956 F. Supp. 2d 842 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 9, 2013
Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 584 , 107 S.Ct. 2573 , 96 L.Ed.2d 510 (1987); Board of Ed. of Westside Community Schools (Dist. 66) v. … Bates v. Deal, 728 S.W.2d 326, 326 (Tenn.1987); Jones v. Brown, 727 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Tenn.1987) (“This statute is very specific. Plaintiff is entitled to full back pay at the rate of a teacher’s salary.”). Thompson v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 2025
Introduction Presently pending is a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by pro se Petitioner Raheem Brown (Petitioner) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. … Williams v. McKean, 2019 WL 1118057, at *5 n. 6 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 11, 2019) (citing United States v. Cepero, 224 F.3d 256, 264-65 (3d Cir. 2000), abrogated on other grounds by Gonzalez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTurner v. United States Capitol Police Board
District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 16, 2014
Niedermeier v. Office of Max S. Baucus, 153 F. Supp. 2d 23, 28 (D.D.C. 2001) (citing Anyanwutaku v. Moore, 151 F.3d 1053, 1057 (D.C. Cir. 1998)); see also Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 671 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); Solomon v. Univ. of S. Cal., 255 F.R.D. 303, 304 (D.D.C. 2009).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMassie v. Board of Trustees, Haywood Community College
357 F. Supp. 2d 878 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 16, 2005
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e); see also Celotex Corp. v. … See, Bowen v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedWinters v. Illinois State Board of Elections
197 F. Supp. 2d 1110 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 20, 2001
Compare Reynolds v. … See Campuzano v. Illinois State Board of Elections, No. 01 C 50376. Therefore, the court considers the procedural due process argument a non-issue and need address it no further. D.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · Jul 27, 2021
Cox v. Warden, 911 F.2d 1111, 1113 (5th Cir. 1990). Brown’s claims that he was improperly convicted do not challenge the execution of his federal sentence but instead attack the validity of his federal sentence. … Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Brown bears the burden of demonstrating that the § 2255 remedy is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWestern Maryland RR. v. System Board of Adjustment
465 F. Supp. 963 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jan 23, 1979
Reynolds, the General Chairman of BRAC System Board No. 6, acknowledged that the provisions of the “scope rule” covering the BRAC represented employees of the plaintiff railroads is “closer to reaching the goal” of the changes … In Boys Markets v.
Cited 11 timesPublished
Ask Donna