Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFD

10,000+ results

1.62s

  • United States v. Hernández-De La Rosa

    606 F. Supp. 2d 175 · District Court, D. Puerto Rico · Feb 12, 2009

    Crowe v. Marchand, 506 F.3d 13, 16 (1st Cir.2007). … Gray v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization

    511 F. Supp. 553 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 3, 1981

    This situation remained unchanged until the California Supreme Court ruled in August, 1980 in Board of Supervisors of San Diego v. … United States v. City and County of San Francisco, 310 U.S. 16, 30-31 , 60 S.Ct. 749, 756-757 , 84 L.Ed. 1050 (1940). Lathan v. Volpe, 455 F.2d 1111, 1116-17 (9th Cir. 1971); Sierra Club v.

    Modified by Trailer Train Company, a Corporation and Railbox Company, a Corporation v. State Board of Equalization, 697 F.2d 860 (1983)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. County School Board of Arlington County, Virginia

    204 F. Supp. 620 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Mar 1, 1962

    Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 ; 2 . Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 . 3 . Carson v. … Boson v. Rippy, supra. 7 . See Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 873 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Fudge v. Brown

    District Court, D. New Mexico · Jul 16, 2020

    Sawyer v. Gorman, 317 Fed.Appx. 725, 727 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12 (1991)). Plaintiff’s allegations against Defendant Brown show that his actions were taken in his judicial capacity. … See Stump v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Errington

    District Court, S.D. Mississippi · Oct 7, 2021

    PETITIONER v. … See Reed v. Stephens, 739 F.3d 753, 767 (5th Cir. 2014); see also Davis v. Blackburn, 789 F.2d 350, 352 (5th Cir. 1986).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Scaglione

    District Court, E.D. Michigan · Aug 1, 2022

    (See id. at 4:00-4:30 (describing Plaintiff as a “mixed” race black male in his twenties named “Ray Brown” wearing a black shirt and blue jeans).) … Wright, 962 F.3d at 870 (citing Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 447, 462 (6th Cir. 2016)). Plaintiff does not directly contest that Officer Scaglione had probable cause to arrest Plaintiff. Nor can he.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Delaware, L. & W. Ry. Co. v. Johnson-Brown Co.

    270 F. 679 · District Court, S.D. Georgia · Feb 10, 1921

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Wasmer

    District Court, D. Nebraska · Feb 12, 2021

    Here, Brown argues the court erred when it determined that his habeas petition was a second or successive petition because his “first § 2254 filing (Brown v. … (See Filing No. 31 at CM/ECF pp. 3–4, Case No. 8:10CV236 (citing Barrett v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Innes v. Board of Regents of the University System

    29 F. Supp. 3d 566 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jul 1, 2014

    There is thus no need to pursue a claim against Defendant[s] Brown and Hayer in their official capacities.” The same logic applies here. … v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown 464263 v. Storey

    District Court, W.D. Michigan · Sep 8, 2025

    BROWN #464263, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:24-cv-77 v. … See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wolf v. Brown County

    District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Mar 2, 2023

    See Smith v. Dart, 803 F.3d 304, 309–10 (7th Cir. 2015) (quoting Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 535 (1979)). … See Lewis v. Stenz, 637 F. App'x 943, 944 (7th Cir. 2016).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Kijakazi

    District Court, D. Maryland · Jan 27, 2023

    Nancy G. v. Kijakazi, No. GLS 20-3440, 2022 WL 363824, at *3 (D. Md. Feb. 4, 2022) (citing Thomas v. … Britt v. Saul, 860 F. Appx. 256, 262 (4th Cir. 2021).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Wilson

    District Court, E.D. Michigan · Sep 29, 2022

    People v. Brown, No. 346401, 2019 WL 7206131, at *3 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 26, 2019). … See Darden v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kucera v. Jefferson County Board of School Commissioners

    956 F. Supp. 2d 842 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 9, 2013

    Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 584 , 107 S.Ct. 2573 , 96 L.Ed.2d 510 (1987); Board of Ed. of Westside Community Schools (Dist. 66) v. … Bates v. Deal, 728 S.W.2d 326, 326 (Tenn.1987); Jones v. Brown, 727 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Tenn.1987) (“This statute is very specific. Plaintiff is entitled to full back pay at the rate of a teacher’s salary.”). Thompson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. United States

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 2025

    Introduction Presently pending is a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by pro se Petitioner Raheem Brown (Petitioner) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. … Williams v. McKean, 2019 WL 1118057, at *5 n. 6 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 11, 2019) (citing United States v. Cepero, 224 F.3d 256, 264-65 (3d Cir. 2000), abrogated on other grounds by Gonzalez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Turner v. United States Capitol Police Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 16, 2014

    Niedermeier v. Office of Max S. Baucus, 153 F. Supp. 2d 23, 28 (D.D.C. 2001) (citing Anyanwutaku v. Moore, 151 F.3d 1053, 1057 (D.C. Cir. 1998)); see also Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 671 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); Solomon v. Univ. of S. Cal., 255 F.R.D. 303, 304 (D.D.C. 2009).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Massie v. Board of Trustees, Haywood Community College

    357 F. Supp. 2d 878 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 16, 2005

    Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e); see also Celotex Corp. v. … See, Bowen v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Winters v. Illinois State Board of Elections

    197 F. Supp. 2d 1110 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 20, 2001

    Compare Reynolds v. … See Campuzano v. Illinois State Board of Elections, No. 01 C 50376. Therefore, the court considers the procedural due process argument a non-issue and need address it no further. D.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Reiser

    District Court, S.D. Mississippi · Jul 27, 2021

    Cox v. Warden, 911 F.2d 1111, 1113 (5th Cir. 1990). Brown’s claims that he was improperly convicted do not challenge the execution of his federal sentence but instead attack the validity of his federal sentence. … Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Brown bears the burden of demonstrating that the § 2255 remedy is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Western Maryland RR. v. System Board of Adjustment

    465 F. Supp. 963 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jan 23, 1979

    Reynolds, the General Chairman of BRAC System Board No. 6, acknowledged that the provisions of the “scope rule” covering the BRAC represented employees of the plaintiff railroads is “closer to reaching the goal” of the changes … In Boys Markets v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.