Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFD

10,000+ results

1.88s

  • Drane v. Brown

    District Court, E.D. Michigan · Jan 23, 2024

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MIKE BROWN, Respondent, ____________________ … In Herrera v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • BROWN v. YOUNG

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 22, 2021

    No. 21-13805 (NLH)(MJS) : v. … See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988) (prisoner mailbox rule); Papotto v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Ross

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 29, 2022

    See Ackra Direct Marketing Corp. v. … See Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (stating that district court may dismiss a pro se litigant’s action for failure to comply with a court order on its own initiative).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Annucci

    District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 30, 2019

    BROWN, et PONTCALRO YG ooh □ Plaintiff, : tember py . … See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012). II.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Yonkers Board of Education

    7 F. Supp. 2d 396 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 15, 1998

    Milliken II [v. Bradley], 433 U.S. [267] 280-81 [ 97 S.Ct. 2749 , 53 L.Ed.2d 745 (1977)] ... Because the remedy “can reach no further than the incremental harm caused by the infraction itself’ Arthur v. … V. REVISING THE FORMULA As Dr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. SMITH

    District Court, D. New Jersey · May 7, 2021

    , MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER v. … . § 1983,1 see ECF No. 1; and 1 Plaintiff is also participating in a related proposed class action, Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gorham v. Town of Trumbull Board of Education

    7 F. Supp. 3d 218 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Mar 26, 2014

    Gorham testifies that he was bringing garbage to the dumpster on the loading dock and saw a brown case in the dumpster. The case was clearly worn out. … See Crump v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Smalls

    District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 30, 2019

    See Brown v. 1 Petitioner appears to refer to the judge in his criminal case as “the debt collector.” (See, e.g., ECF No. 2, at 2.) Dunbar, ECF 1:19-CV-6421, 5. … See People v. Brown, No. 05595-2016 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Kings Cnty.).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brian B. Brown Constr. Co. v. St. Tammany Parish

    17 F. Supp. 2d 586 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jul 13, 1998

    There is, however, some precedent that when a zoning board makes a “specific decision regarding a specific piece of property,” the action “may be more likely termed adjudicative.” County Line Joint Venture v. … Clark v. County of Winnebago, *590 817 F.2d 407, 408 (7th Cir.1987).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jefferson v. Jefferson County Board of Education

    196 F. Supp. 2d 515 · District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Apr 9, 2002

    In so holding, the court relied, in part, on the decision in Presley v. … Black v. Columbus Public Schools, 124 F.Supp.2d 550, 584 (S.D.Ohio 2000). 3.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Drane v. Brown

    District Court, E.D. Michigan · Feb 16, 2024

    Drane v. Brown, No. 2:20-CV-10114, 2024 WL 249018 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 23, 2024). Petitioner has filed a motion to alter or to amend the judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. … Drane v. Brown, 2024 WL 249018, at * 5. This Court concluded that there was no Ex Post Facto violation to extend the limitations period where the original limitations period had not yet run. Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Braman

    District Court, E.D. Michigan · Aug 31, 2023

    People v. Brown, No. 337223, 2018 WL 4573233, at *1 (Mich. Ct. App. Sept. 13, 2018). … See also Brown v. Michigan, 140 S. Ct. 840, reh’g den., 140 S. Ct. 2558 (2020). 484 (2000)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • National Credit Union Administration Board v. Metzler

    625 F. Supp. 1551 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 17, 1986

    The National Credit Union Administration is an agency of the United States government and plaintiff, the National Credit Union Administration Board (NCUAB) manages said agency. 2. … Corp. v. Waldron, 630 F.2d 239, 241 (4th Cir.1980); Desjardins v. Desjardins, 308 F.2d 111, 116 (6th Cir.1962); Current News Features v. Pulitzer Pub. Co., 81 F.2d 288, 290-91 (8th Cir.1936); Hubbard v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Myers v. Penn Township Board of Commissioners

    50 F. Supp. 2d 385 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1999

    See also Sanguigni v. Pittsburgh Board of Public Education, 968 F.2d 393, 401 (3d Cir.1992) (“In Unger ... we noted that only two types of contracts have been found to be property protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. … See Rocky Mountain Materials & As phalt, Inc. v. Board of County Comm’rs, 972 F.2d 309 (10th Cir.1992) (failure to pursue inverse condemnation action bars takings claim as unripe).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cody v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

    468 F. Supp. 431 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 10, 1979

    Strand v. Schmittroth, 251 F.2d 590, 599 (9th Cir. 1957). See Nolan v. United States, 163 F.2d 768, 771 (8th Cir. 1947); Banks v. … Sherrill v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sharrah v. Brown

    District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Aug 9, 2021

    Pursuant to Younger v. … Meador v. Paulson, 385 F. App’x 613 (8th Cir. 2010); see also Gillette v. N. Dakota Disc. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • BROWN v. SMITH

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 10, 2021

    v. … Brown v. Warren, No. 20-7907 (D.N.J.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Barr v. Brown, Warden

    District Court, N.D. West Virginia · Oct 4, 2024

    BROWN, Warden, Respondent. … [Doc. 10 at 5 (citing Ali v. Brown, 2023 WL 11900183, at *3 (N.D. W.Va. July 27, 2023) (Mazzone, M.J.), report and recommendation adopted, 2023 WL 11900182 (N.D. W.Va. Aug. 15, 2023) (Bailey, J.)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Jacobsen

    District Court, D. Montana · Mar 8, 2022

    V. … See White v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Venettozi

    District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 26, 2019

    BROWN, Plaintiff, No. 18-CV-2628 (KMk) . … service of the summons and (Amended) Complaint to be completed within 90 days of the date the summons issues, and it is Plaintiff's responsibility to request, if necessary, an extension of time for service, See Meilleur v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.