Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.88s
District Court, E.D. Michigan · Jan 23, 2024
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MIKE BROWN, Respondent, ____________________ … In Herrera v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 22, 2021
No. 21-13805 (NLH)(MJS) : v. … See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988) (prisoner mailbox rule); Papotto v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 29, 2022
See Ackra Direct Marketing Corp. v. … See Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (stating that district court may dismiss a pro se litigant’s action for failure to comply with a court order on its own initiative).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Dec 30, 2019
BROWN, et PONTCALRO YG ooh □ Plaintiff, : tember py . … See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012). II.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States v. Yonkers Board of Education
7 F. Supp. 2d 396 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 15, 1998
Milliken II [v. Bradley], 433 U.S. [267] 280-81 [ 97 S.Ct. 2749 , 53 L.Ed.2d 745 (1977)] ... Because the remedy “can reach no further than the incremental harm caused by the infraction itself’ Arthur v. … V. REVISING THE FORMULA As Dr.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · May 7, 2021
, MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER v. … . § 1983,1 see ECF No. 1; and 1 Plaintiff is also participating in a related proposed class action, Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGorham v. Town of Trumbull Board of Education
7 F. Supp. 3d 218 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Mar 26, 2014
Gorham testifies that he was bringing garbage to the dumpster on the loading dock and saw a brown case in the dumpster. The case was clearly worn out. … See Crump v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Oct 30, 2019
See Brown v. 1 Petitioner appears to refer to the judge in his criminal case as “the debt collector.” (See, e.g., ECF No. 2, at 2.) Dunbar, ECF 1:19-CV-6421, 5. … See People v. Brown, No. 05595-2016 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Kings Cnty.).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrian B. Brown Constr. Co. v. St. Tammany Parish
17 F. Supp. 2d 586 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jul 13, 1998
There is, however, some precedent that when a zoning board makes a “specific decision regarding a specific piece of property,” the action “may be more likely termed adjudicative.” County Line Joint Venture v. … Clark v. County of Winnebago, *590 817 F.2d 407, 408 (7th Cir.1987).
Cited 1 timesPublishedJefferson v. Jefferson County Board of Education
196 F. Supp. 2d 515 · District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Apr 9, 2002
In so holding, the court relied, in part, on the decision in Presley v. … Black v. Columbus Public Schools, 124 F.Supp.2d 550, 584 (S.D.Ohio 2000). 3.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · Feb 16, 2024
Drane v. Brown, No. 2:20-CV-10114, 2024 WL 249018 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 23, 2024). Petitioner has filed a motion to alter or to amend the judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. … Drane v. Brown, 2024 WL 249018, at * 5. This Court concluded that there was no Ex Post Facto violation to extend the limitations period where the original limitations period had not yet run. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · Aug 31, 2023
People v. Brown, No. 337223, 2018 WL 4573233, at *1 (Mich. Ct. App. Sept. 13, 2018). … See also Brown v. Michigan, 140 S. Ct. 840, reh’g den., 140 S. Ct. 2558 (2020). 484 (2000)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownNational Credit Union Administration Board v. Metzler
625 F. Supp. 1551 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 17, 1986
The National Credit Union Administration is an agency of the United States government and plaintiff, the National Credit Union Administration Board (NCUAB) manages said agency. 2. … Corp. v. Waldron, 630 F.2d 239, 241 (4th Cir.1980); Desjardins v. Desjardins, 308 F.2d 111, 116 (6th Cir.1962); Current News Features v. Pulitzer Pub. Co., 81 F.2d 288, 290-91 (8th Cir.1936); Hubbard v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMyers v. Penn Township Board of Commissioners
50 F. Supp. 2d 385 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1999
See also Sanguigni v. Pittsburgh Board of Public Education, 968 F.2d 393, 401 (3d Cir.1992) (“In Unger ... we noted that only two types of contracts have been found to be property protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. … See Rocky Mountain Materials & As phalt, Inc. v. Board of County Comm’rs, 972 F.2d 309 (10th Cir.1992) (failure to pursue inverse condemnation action bars takings claim as unripe).
Cited 1 timesPublishedCody v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
468 F. Supp. 431 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 10, 1979
Strand v. Schmittroth, 251 F.2d 590, 599 (9th Cir. 1957). See Nolan v. United States, 163 F.2d 768, 771 (8th Cir. 1947); Banks v. … Sherrill v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · Aug 9, 2021
Pursuant to Younger v. … Meador v. Paulson, 385 F. App’x 613 (8th Cir. 2010); see also Gillette v. N. Dakota Disc. Bd.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 10, 2021
v. … Brown v. Warren, No. 20-7907 (D.N.J.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · Oct 4, 2024
BROWN, Warden, Respondent. … [Doc. 10 at 5 (citing Ali v. Brown, 2023 WL 11900183, at *3 (N.D. W.Va. July 27, 2023) (Mazzone, M.J.), report and recommendation adopted, 2023 WL 11900182 (N.D. W.Va. Aug. 15, 2023) (Bailey, J.)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Dec 26, 2019
BROWN, Plaintiff, No. 18-CV-2628 (KMk) . … service of the summons and (Amended) Complaint to be completed within 90 days of the date the summons issues, and it is Plaintiff's responsibility to request, if necessary, an extension of time for service, See Meilleur v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna