Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.40s
District Court, D. Nevada · Apr 6, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 KASHARD BROWN … See Anderson v. Air 18 West, 542 F.2d 522, 524 (9th Cir. 1976).
Cited 0 timesUnknownCessna Aircraft Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
405 F. Supp. 1042 · District Court, D. Kansas · Dec 2, 1975
BROWN, Chief Judge. On April 30, 1975, plaintiff, Cessna Aircraft Company filed this action, seeking relief under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U. … In support of this position, defendants cite Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. N.L.R.B. (6 Cir. 1970) 433 F.2d 210, 211 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Gala-Mo Arts (8 Cir. 1956) 232 F.2d 102, 106 ; Polymers, Inc. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · May 15, 2020
BROWN, [usc sor Plaintiff, : | OCCUMENT peed PONTO ALLY FILED |p □ V. … Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Mar 3, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CARLTON BROWN, Plaintiff, No. 18-CV-5439 (KMK) v. … Drake v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSymons v. Chrysler Corp. Loan Guarantee Board
488 F. Supp. 874 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 1980
United States v. Conlon, No, 79-2283, slip op. at 8, (D.C.Cir. April 16, 1980). In Zeigier Coal Co. v. … See United States v. Babcock, 530 F.2d 1051 (D.C.Cir. 1976).
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · Jul 7, 2023
Accordingly, the Court recommends denying Brown’s Request for Rule 11 sanctions. V. NON-DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS A. … Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate Cases (Dkt. 41) Brown seeks consolidation of this case with other civil rights cases involving civilly committed persons, namely: Brown v. Ludeman, et al., D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLorain NAACP v. Lorain Board of Education
768 F. Supp. 1224 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 21, 1991
The myriad of desegregation lawsuits in this country following the landmark Supreme Court case of Brown v. … Penick, 443 U.S. 449 , 99 S.Ct. 2941 , 61 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979); Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 443 U.S. 526 , 99 S.Ct. 2971 , 61 L.Ed.2d 720 (1979); Bronson v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedThompson v. County School Board of Hanover County
252 F. Supp. 546 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jan 27, 1966
In Wright v. County School Board of Greensville Co., Va., 252 F.Supp. 378 (E.D.Va.1966) decided this day, the court discussed the principles and the authorities which are applicable to this case. … ‘The ideal to which a freedom of choice plan must ultimately aspire, as well as any other desegregation plan, is that school boards will operate “schools,” not “Negro schools” or “white schools.” ’ Brown v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRamirez v. New York City Board of Education
481 F. Supp. 2d 209 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 30, 2007
See Todd v. … Ramirez contends that the Board should not be permitted to argue that Taylor-Brown was unaware that Ramirez suffered from an impairment because he granted Ramirez leave under the FMLA.
Cited 16 timesPublishedBlalock v. Dale County Board of Education
84 F. Supp. 2d 1291 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Dec 15, 1999
Brown v. City of Ft. Lauderdale, 923 F.2d 1474 , 1480 (11th Cir.1991) (quoting Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 481 , 106 S.Ct. 1292 , 89 L.Ed.2d 452 (1986)). … See Brown, 923 F.2d at 1481.
Cited 17 timesPublishedPAPARIELLO v. ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2024
See Pucillo v. … Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc., 550 F.3d 294, 298 (3d Cir. 2008) (explaining that the standard employed by courts effectuates the intent of the Act which is to “protect the gullible as well as the shrewd” (quoting Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Nevada · May 18, 2021
P. 8(a)(2); see also McHenry v. … See McHenry v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. New York · Feb 28, 2020
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the judgment against Brown in a reasoned opinion issued on March 21, 2014. People v. Brown, 982 N.Y.S.2d 255, 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014). … Brown sought leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals, which was summarily denied on August 12, 2014. People v. Brown, 18 N.E.3d 1140, 1140 (N.Y. 2014).
Cited 0 timesUnknownState Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corp.
566 F. Supp. 945 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 30, 1983
State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corp., 654 F.2d at 854 (emphasis added). … In Elkind v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTrailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization
511 F. Supp. 553 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 3, 1981
This situation remained unchanged until the California Supreme Court ruled in August, 1980 in Board of Supervisors of San Diego v. … United States v. City and County of San Francisco, 310 U.S. 16, 30-31 , 60 S.Ct. 749, 756-757 , 84 L.Ed. 1050 (1940). Lathan v. Volpe, 455 F.2d 1111, 1116-17 (9th Cir. 1971); Sierra Club v.
Modified by Trailer Train Company, a Corporation and Railbox Company, a Corporation v. State Board of Equalization, 697 F.2d 860 (1983)Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Nevada · Jun 3, 2021
ORDER 8 CAROLL LEE BROWN; JACQUELINE BROWN; CLAYTON M. … Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct 1 || “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 2 || Thomas v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHosick v. Chicago State University Board of Trustees
924 F. Supp. 2d 956 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 14, 2013
Plaintiff Stephen Seth Hosick, a former employee of Chicago State University (“CSU”), has sued the CSU Board of Trustees (“Board”), former Board chairman Dr. … Leonard v. E. Ill.
Cited 18 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · Mar 26, 2018
In Ashley v. … See Martin, 319 F.3d at 1050; see also, Luedtke v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 26, 2021
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 5:21-cv-00024-MR MARCUS RANDALL BROWN … P. 41(b) (“If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it.”); Link v. Wabash R.R.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. New York · Sep 26, 2019
Robinson v. Concentra Health Servs., Inc., -7- 781 F.3d 42, 44 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co., 654 F.3d 347, 358 (2d Cir. 2011)). … Brown, 654 F.3d at 358.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna