Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFD

10,000+ results

1.29s

  • Schulz v. Washington County Board of Supervisors

    349 F. Supp. 2d 375 · District Court, N.D. New York · Dec 14, 2004

    In Congdon v. … In Schulz v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Gray

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 8, 2019

    Furthermore, although pro se complaints are to be construed liberally, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972), “basic pleading essentials” are still required, Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … Brown v. Mohr, No. 2:13-CV-0006, 2016 WL 4721190, at *15–16 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 9, 2016), report and recommendation adopted, No. 2:13-CV-006, 2017 WL 127478 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 13, 2017) (citing Hill v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ASHI v. BROWN

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 28, 2022

    Brown and New Penn rely on Deravil v. Pantaleone, Civ. No. 2064-18, 2019 WL 5681205, at *7 (N.J. App. Div. … Mary Ann Pensiero, Inc. v. Lingle, 847 F.2d 90, 92 (3d Cir. 1988) (citing Snow Machines, Inc. v. Hedco, Inc., 838 F.2d 718, 727 (3d Cir. 1988)); see also Brubaker Kitchens, Inc. v. Brown, 280 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Automattic

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 28, 2020

    Brown v. Automattic Inc., Bluehost, Twitter, Inc. Index No. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • PICKETT v. BROWN

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 22, 2022

    Brown, Michelle Brown-Pierce, Priscilla Brown, Belinda Brown, and Rasheek Burden (collectively 1 The Court sets forth the facts based on what it can glean from Plaintiff’s unartfully pled filings. … Brown or comply with the Brown Defendants’ demands, or if he called the police. Id. at ¶¶ 4-5, 25-29.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Johnson v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 3, 2020

    v. … Kalie v. Bank of Am. Corp., No. 12-CV-9192, 2013 WL 4044951, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2013) (quoting United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Morgan Dallas Corp. v. Orleans Parish School Board

    302 F. Supp. 1208 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Aug 27, 1969

    The School Board is a “citizen” of Louisiana. Of course, the School Board is an agency of the State; its action is state action. … Leavell & Co. v. Board of Comm’rs & Dept. of Hys., State of La., E.D.La.1969, memorandum opinion. II. The petitioners have not waived the right of removal.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Admiral Heating & Ventilating, Inc.

    104 F.R.D. 23 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 12, 1984

    See Locklin v. Day-Glo *34 Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873 , 878 (7th Cir.1970). … Ranney-Brown Distributors, Inc. v. E.T. Barwick Industries, Inc., 75 F.R.D. 3, 5 (S.D.Ohio 1977). That, however, fails to take note of a clear difference between the two rules.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board Union & National Labor Relations Board Professional Ass'n v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

    313 F. App'x 328 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 2009

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bias v. Brown

    District Court, D. Idaho · Jun 1, 2021

    Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). … See Las Vegas Sands, LLC v. Nehme, 632 F.3d 526, 532 (9th Cir. 2011); see also Fair Hous. Council of Riverside Cnty., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Richards v. New York City Board of Education

    668 F. Supp. 259 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 24, 1987

    See generally, General Building Contractors Association v. Pennsylvania, 458 U.S. 375, 391 , 102 S.Ct. 3141, 3150 , 73 L.Ed.2d 835 (1982); Krulik v. Board of Education, 781 F.2d 15, 23 (2d Cir.1986). … Krulik v. Board of Education of City of New York, 781 F.2d 15, 23 (2d Cir.1986); Rookard v. Health and Hospitals Corp., 710 F.2d 41, 45 (2d Cir.1983). 7 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Bivins v. Bibb County Board of Education

    331 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, M.D. Georgia · Sep 1, 1971

    Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 , April 20, 1971, Part V (2), “taking into account the practicalities of the situation” Davis v. … Swann, Part V (3).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. WARREN

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 3, 2022

    Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962); see also Arthur v. Maersk, 434 F.3d 196, 204 (3d. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Chou v. New York State Board of Elections

    332 F. Supp. 2d 510 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 25, 2004

    Defendants are the New *512 York State Board of Elections and the Suffolk County Board of Elections, as well as the Commissioners of each Board sued in their official capacity. 1 On July 9, 2004, plaintiffs moved for a preliminary … Lerman, 232 F.3d at 146-47: see also Buckley v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Menefee v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. Alabama · Jul 14, 2022

    Brown v. Tallahassee Police Dep’t, 205 F. App’x 802, 802 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Lopez v. Aransas Cty. Indep. Sch. … See Wilson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board

    109 F. Supp. 101 · District Court, D. Alaska · Dec 31, 1952

    Supplemental letters and written statements could be used by the Board to aid it in reaching its decision. Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board, 9 Cir., 191 F.2d 260 and Id., 9 Cir., 191 F. 2d 262 . … Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. Cyr, 9 Cir., 1952, 200 F.2d 633 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Annucci

    District Court, S.D. New York · May 18, 2020

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | SEE CTROA TeSeY □□□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC eee DATE FILED:_S // 8/2020 CARL BROWN … See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service); see also Murray v. Pataki, 378 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Campuzano v. Illinois State Board of Elections

    241 F. Supp. 2d 892 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 10, 2003

    . § 1973 , see Campuzano v. Illinois State Board of Elections, 200 F.Supp.2d 905 (N.D.Ill.2002), and will repeat only those facts relevant to the present motion. … Coar of the Northern District of Illinois in King v. State Board of Elections, No. 95 C 827, 2002 WL 221606 (N.D.Ill. Feb.11, 2002).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Climax Molybdenum Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    407 F. Supp. 208 · District Court, D. Colorado · Nov 14, 1975

    N.L.R.B. v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 421 U.S. 132, 149 , 95 S.Ct. 1504 , 44 L.Ed.2d 29 (1975); Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co., 415 U.S. 1, 24 , 94 S.Ct. 1028 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1973). … N.L.R.B. v. Automotive Textile Products Co., 422 F.2d 1255 (6th Cir. 1970); N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • LIVENGOOD v. BROWN

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 17, 2022

    v. … But the Complaint fails to state a claim against Defendant NCDPS because Defendant NCDPS, as a state agency, constitutes “an arm of the state,” Hanifee v. Board of Educ. of Kent Cnty., Civ.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.