Case law

Brown v. Tutt

District Court, D. South Carolina · Oct 1, 2019

See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 649 (7th Cir. 2007); Montgomery v. Pinchak, 294 F.8d 492, 499 (3d Cir. 2002). … V. adper October 1, 2019 Shiva V. Hodges Columbia, South Carolina United States Magistrate Judge

State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corp.

589 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 11, 1984

State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor, 566 F.Supp. 945, 953-54 (S.D.N.Y.1983). … State Teachers has noted that in United States v.

Sweeney v. State Board of Public Assistance

36 F. Supp. 973 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 5, 1941

The above suit alleges the unconstitutionality of a regulation of the State Board of Public Assistance, and for this reason jurisdiction of the matter is in the United States District Court. … Petitioner’s sole complaint has been that the State Board, in carrying into effect the Pennsylvania Public Assistance *974 Law, has formulated a regulation which violates his rights guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment

Bivins v. Bibb County Board of Education

331 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, M.D. Georgia · Sep 1, 1971

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 , April 20, 1971, Part V (2), “taking into account the practicalities of the situation” Davis v. … Swann, Part V (3).

Brown v. Yates

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Jun 18, 2020

Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991). … See Lee v.

Baker v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 13, 2020

Brown, et al., No. CIV-19-00217-JD, at 15 (W.D. Okla. … See generally 42 U.S.C. § 1396a; Brown v. Day, 555 F.3d 882, 885 (10th Cir. 2009).

Warton v. New Fairfield Board of Education

125 F. Supp. 2d 22 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Nov 8, 2000

Board of Educ. of Hendrick Hudson Cent. Sch. Dist. V. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 188-89 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982). … See Board of Educ. v. Illinois State Bd. Of Educ., 103 F.3d 545 , 550 (7th Cir.1996). 7 .The Court is ruling herein on the narrow issue of Brian's stay-put placement during the pendency of the appeal.

Brown v. May

District Court, D. South Carolina · Sep 4, 2019

Brown, ) C/A No. 0:18-3347-TMC-PJG Plaintiff, v. … As the plaintiffis proceeding pro se, the court entered orders pursuant to Roseboro v.

Interstate Outdoor Advertising v. Zoning Board

672 F. Supp. 2d 675 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 7, 2009

Surin v. … Elray Outdoor Corp. v. Board of Adjustment of City of Englewood, 2009 WL 2851018 at *7 (N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div. September 08, 2009) (citing State v. Miller, 83 N.J. 402, 411 , 416 A.2d 821 (1980)).

Newman v. Brown

District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Sep 3, 2024

No: 4:24-cv-00742-KGB-PSH RODNEY BROWN, et al. … See Goff v. Harper, 60 F.3d 518 (8th Cir. 1995).

Smith v. Brown

District Court, D. New Mexico · Mar 24, 2023

BROWN, President of the University of New Mexico Board of Regents; UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO POLICE DEPARTMENT … See Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991). Courts will not assume, however, the role of the litigant’s advocate. See Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.3d at 1110.

McLaughlin v. North Carolina Board of Elections

850 F. Supp. 373 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 19, 1994

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 729 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1278-1279 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974); Bullock v. Carter, 405 U.S. at 145 , 92 S.Ct. at 856-857 ; Jenness, 403 U.S. at 442 , 91 S.Ct. at 1976 ; Williams v. … See Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 737 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1282 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). 16 .

Brown v. Tromba

District Court, D. Nevada · Nov 14, 2022

See ASAP Storage, Inc. v. … Ascon Properties, Inc. v.

Brown, Scott v. Drake

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · May 14, 2025

Carter v. Bennett, 399 F. Supp. 2d 936, 937 (W.D. Wis. 2005). … Plaintiff Scott Brown is assessed an initial partial payment of $28.22.

Brown Bark I, L.P. v. Traverse City Light & Power Department

736 F. Supp. 2d 1099 · District Court, W.D. Michigan · Sep 7, 2010

The charges were voluntarily incurred and agreed to only by the developer, and in turn, by foreclosure buyer Brown Bark, to pay for a specific project undertaken primarily for the private benefit of the developer/Brown Bark … First, the amounts which TCLP seeks to collect from plaintiff Brown Bark here were charged only to Brown Bark’s predecessor (Brewery Creek Development, LLC), not to any broader class of businesses, persons, or property-owners

Marshall v. Board of Ed. of Baltimore Cty.

470 F. Supp. 517 · District Court, D. Maryland · Apr 25, 1979

Usery v. Board of Education of Baltimore County, 462 F.Supp. 535 (D.Md.1978). … Jersey City Board of Education, 374 F.Supp. 817, 833 (D.N.J.1974). Generally, an employer’s good faith is not a sufficient reason for denial of pre-judgment interest. Thus, in Brennan v.

SIMONS v. BROWN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 2020

Whitehead v. … LLC v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576, 585 (2008) and Stolt- Nielsen S.A. v.

Hill v. Brown

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 12, 2020

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).

BROWN v. MAY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 2019

Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 216 (3d Cir. 2001). “[P]roof of the mere existence of an unlawful policy or custom is not enough to maintain a § 1983 action.” Bielevicz v. … Newport v. Fact Concerts, 453 U.S. 247, 271 (1981). Summary judgment is therefore granted in Defendants’ favor as to Brown’s request for punitive damages. See Long v. Bristol Twp., No. 10-1069, 2012 U.S. Dist.

Lynch v. Kenston School District Board of Education

229 F. Supp. 740 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 20, 1964

Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 300 , 75 S.Ct. 753, 756 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955). Thus, the Court did not order integration. … Brown v. Board of Educa *743 tion, 139 F.Supp. 468, 470 (D.Kan.1955), quoted with approval in Kelley v. Board of Education, 270 F.2d 209, 229 (6th Cir. 1959).