Case law

E.B. v. New York City Board of Education

233 F.R.D. 289 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 1, 2005

Board of Ed. of the City of East Orange, 219 F.R.D. 333, 337 (D.N.J.2004). … See, e.g., Roberts v. Hunt, 187 F.R.D. 71, 75 (W.D.N.Y.1999); Franzon v. Massena Memorial Hosp., 189 F.R.D. 220, 224 (N.D.N.Y. 1999); Boyd v. City of New York, 1987 WL 6915 , at *2; see also Cruz v.

MetroBanc v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

666 F. Supp. 981 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Aug 17, 1987

South Georgia Nat’l Gas Co. v. F.E.R.C., 699 F.2d 1088 (11th Cir.1983). The Court finds no arbitrariness or capriciousness in the Bank Board’s promulgation of the interpretive rule. See Motor Vehicles Mfrs Ass'n v. … Moreover, the rule and the Bank Board’s position are rationally related to an effort to meet the current condition of the thrift industry. Orleans Audubon Society v.

Gallegos v. Bernalillo County Board of County Commissioners

278 F. Supp. 3d 1245 · District Court, D. New Mexico · Sep 30, 2017

Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Bernalillo County Board of County Commissioners’ (“Bernalillo County”) Motion to Dismiss, filed January 6, 2017 (Doc. 45)(“Motion”). … Retirement Sys. v. Thornburg Mortg. Secs. Trust 2006-3, 825 F.Supp.2d 1082, 1150-51 (D.N.M. 2011)(Browning, J.); Mata v. Anderson, 760 F.Supp.2d 1068, 1101 (D.N.M. 2009)(Browning, J.)

Brown v. Saul

District Court, N.D. New York · Sep 24, 2020

See Johnson v. … Schall v.

Brown v. Wolfe

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 29, 2024

Ingraham v. Wright, 430 (4:23-CV-1565) U.S. 651, 670 (1977) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976)). … Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 7 (1992).

Zigmond v. Selective Service Local Board 16

284 F. Supp. 732 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 9, 1968

Local Board #15, New York, 283 F.Supp. 606 (S.D.N.Y.), and the petition for certiorari and memorandum of the Solicitor General of the United States and other papers in Oestereich v. … In these respects, this case is distinguishable from Wolff v.

Brown v. Davis

District Court, S.D. Texas · Mar 26, 2020

Ibid; see also Pichardo v Kinker, 73 F3d 612, 6113 (5th Cir 1996). The Court finds that Brown’s federal petition does not present grounds warranting habeas relief. … See Finley v Johnson, 243 F3d 215, 218 (5th Cir 2001). The Court finds that Brown has not made the necessary showing. 4.

Brown v. O'Connor

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 21, 2024

Brown v. Jenkins, First District Court of Appeals Case No. … Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir. 1989).

BROWN v. BRITTAIN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 2022

Thomas v. … Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987); see also Fed R. Civ.

Brown v. Hollins

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 16, 2024

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON DASHALAHN BROWN, … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). While the Court must “construe a pro se petition to encompass any allegation stating federal relief,” Franklin v.

Gardner v. Railroad Retirement Board

57 F. Supp. 322 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Sep 9, 1944

.; 1 Bray v. Railroad Retirement Board, D.C.D.C.;1 Morris v. Rail *326 road Retirement Board, D.C.D.C.; 1 Van Natta v. Railroad Retirement Board, D.C. … South case, supra; Bruno v. Railroad Retirement Board, su *329 pra; Ellers v. Railroad Retirement Board, supra; Frawley v. Latimer et al., and Railroad Retirement Board, D.C.N.J., 57 F.Supp. 276 ; Utah Copper Co. v.

Harnett v. Board of Zoning, Subdivision & Building Appeals

350 F. Supp. 1159 · District Court, Virgin Islands · Sep 29, 1972

Co. v. Public Utilities Comm’n, 301 U.S. 292 , 57 S.Ct. 724 , 81 L.Ed. 1093 (1937); Londoner v. Denver, 210 U.S. 373 , 28 S.Ct. 708 , 52 L.Ed. 1103 (1908); Folkways Broadcasting Co. v. … See, e.g., Holmes v. New York City Housing Authority, 398 F.2d 262 (2d Cir. 1968); Hornsby v. Allen, 326 F.2d 605 (5th Cir. 1965); United States v. Atkins, 323 F.2d 733, 742 (5th Cir. 1963).

Ocelot Oil Corp. v. Brown Investments, Inc.

125 F.R.D. 168 · District Court, D. Kansas · Mar 6, 1989

Lewis v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners

187 F. Supp. 3d 588 · District Court, D. Maryland · May 20, 2016

See Lack v. … Baqir v.

Sass v. California Board of Prison Terms

376 F. Supp. 2d 975 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 15, 2005

Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 571 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Hewitt v. … Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 371, 377-78 , 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987); Greenholtz, 442 U.S. at 12 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 ; see also I.N.S. v. St.

Maney v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 7, 2023

(See Maney v. State of Or., No. 22-80033, ECF No. 4.) … Trucking Ass’n, Inc. v.

Brown v. Marsh

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 2022

(See id.; see also Commonwealth v. Brown, 143 MAL 2019 (Pa. 2019)). … Commonwealth v. Brown, 2016 WL 5832197, at *1.

Brown v. Berryhill

District Court, S.D. Texas · Mar 11, 2020

Garcia v. Berryhill, 880 F.3d 700, 704 (5th Cir. 2018); Copeland v. Colvin, 771 F.3d 920, 923 (5th Cir. 2014) (citations omitted). … Falco v. Shalala, 27 F.3d 160, 164 n.18 (5th Cir. 1994). The ALJ’s credibility finding and the resulting weight given to Brown’s opinion is entitled to deference. See Chambliss v.

Stewart v. District of Columbia Armory Board

789 F. Supp. 402 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 1992

Board of Airport Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569, 576 , 107 S.Ct. 2568, 2573 , 96 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987). … Stewart v. District of Columbia Armory Board, 863 F.2d 1013, 1017-18 (D.C.Cir.1988) (quoting City of Los Angeles v. Preferred Communications, 476 U.S. 488, 494 , 106 S.Ct. 2034, 2037 , 90 L.Ed.2d 480 (1986)).

Vaughns v. Board of Education of Prince George's County

355 F. Supp. 1034 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jul 25, 1972

Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) (Brown I) and Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971) (Swann). … That conclusion is compelled by the command of Brown I and the implementation required by Brown II 2 as well as by the doctrine of Green v.