Case law

Brown v. Tomlinson

265 F. 460 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 1920

Thereupon the Examiner of Interferences awarded priority on the record to Tomlin-son, Brown having failed to show cause why that should not be done. … Livingston v. Thompson, 45 App. D. C. 522; Hathaway & Lea v. Colman, 46 App. D. C. 40. Appellant has not met this requirement.

Guffy v. Brown (In re Brown Medical Center, Inc.)

552 B.R. 165 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Mar 2, 2016

Turner v. Pleasant, 663 F.3d 770, 775 (5th Cir.2011) (citingHarrington v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 563 F.3d 141, 147 (5th Cir.2009)). … Spicer v. Westbrook, 751 F.3d 354, 365 (5th Cir.2014).

Brown v. Doe

811 F. Supp. 156 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 1, 1993

Petitioner has brought two civil suits under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 growing out of the incident involved, filed respectively in 1983 and 1984: Brown v. Lindermann, et al., 83 Civ. 6174 (RLC), and Brown v. … In People v.

Brown v. Ray

695 F. Supp. 2d 292 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Feb 26, 2010

Thereafter, on January 9, 2009, the PRC advised Brown that it had disapproved Vol. 28 # 5 due to a violation of OP 803.2(V)(L)(12). … The record reveals that the PRC disapproved Brown’s possession of all of these issues based on a determination that they violated either OP 803.2(V)(L)(7), OP 803.2(V)(L)(12) or both.

Armstrong v. Brown

103 F. Supp. 3d 1070 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 3, 2015

They allege that Defendants Brown, et ah, continue to place Class Members in administrative segregation due to a lack of accessible housing.

Brown v. Douglas

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 2014

Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbla CHRISTINA BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. /¢' / 7 W ) MICHAEL DOUGLAS, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the court on review of

Brown v. DeFilippis

695 F. Supp. 1528 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 12, 1988

Background and Prior Proceedings Pro se plaintiff John Brown (“Brown”) filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 , 1985, 1986 and 1988 on May 21, 1987. … At a minimum, these contentions raise serious questions and thus further factfinding may be necessary to determine the merits of Brown’s claims. Prejudice to the plaintiff may not merely result in delay, Davis v.

Brown v. Tomlinson

462 F. Supp. 2d 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 2006

Plaintiffs Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, Pl.’s Exh. 3, Second Affidavit of Cristian Craig Brown (“Sec. Brown Aff.”) at 2. … See Wilson v.

Brown v. Marsh

713 F. Supp. 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 1989

See also United States v. … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 11 (D.C.Cir.1985).

Brown v. Buchanan

419 F. Supp. 199 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Dec 1, 1975

Board of Ed., 493 F.2d 1016 (4th Cir. 1974); Merrill-Stevens Dry Dock Co. v. M/V LAISSEZ FAIRE, 421 F.2d 430 (5th Cir. 1970); Hogan v. Wright, 356 F.2d 595 (6th Cir. 1966); Mack v. Earle M. … See Deitrick, Receiver v. Greaney, 309 U.S. 190, 200 , 60 S.Ct. 480 , 84 L.Ed. 694 (1940); Board of County Commissioners of Jackson Co. v.

Brown v. Leeke

460 F. Supp. 947 · District Court, D. South Carolina · Oct 10, 1978

Hamilton v. New Mexico, 479 F.2d 343 (10th Cir. 1973); Hooks v. 4th District Court of Appeals, Fla., 442 F.2d 1042 (5th Cir. 1971); Bloss v. Michigan, 421 F.2d 903 (6th Cir. 1970). … In Glynn v.

S.H. v. Stickrath

251 F.R.D. 293 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 22, 2008

In United States v. … OCSEA likens this case to Grubbs v. Norris, 870 F.2d 343 (6th Cir.1989) and Linton v.

Brown v. Astrue

597 F. Supp. 2d 691 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Feb 11, 2009

After Brown unsuccessfully sought review by the Appeals Council, she filed suit in this court seeking judicial review under 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g). See Brown v. … See Carey v. Apfel, 230 F.3d 131, 135 (5th Cir.2000) (“The court does not ... try the issues de novo[.]”) (quoting Brown v. Apfel, 192 F.3d 492, 496 (5th Cir.1999)).

Garland v. Brown

52 F. Supp. 401 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Oct 29, 1943

That statement by Garland is made one of the bases of the suit and cross-action by Brown. … There is also a correlative regulation in another department which provides for the hearing,'upon notice, of such citizen before the local Ration Board, and the return of such property if the Board concludes that it should

Brown v. Artus

647 F. Supp. 2d 190 · District Court, N.D. New York · Aug 11, 2009

Brown Deck. (Dkt. No. 68) ¶ 3. … There is evidence, however, to suggest that defendant Artus was or reasonably should have been aware of such occurrences, at least as of July 27, 2007; during an ILC executive board meeting on that date a rise in the number

Buesgens v. Brown

567 F. Supp. 2d 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2008

See, e.g., Ibrahim v. … .”); Artis v.

Brown v. Burnside

109 F.R.D. 412 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 19, 1986

See Matter of Emergency Beacon Corp., 666 F.2d 754, 758 (2d Cir.1981); US. v. Erdoss, 440 F.2d 1221 , 1223 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 849 , 92 S.Ct. 83 , 30 L.Ed.2d 88 (1971); C. Wright, A. Miller & F. … See, e.g., Hawkins v. Lindsley, 327 F.2d *414 356, 358 (2d Cir.1964) (neglect of plaintiffs attorney); Costa v. Chapkines, 316 F.2d 541, 542 (2d Cir.1963) (dismissal for want of prosecution); McCawley v.

Charles v. Brown

495 F. Supp. 862 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Sep 4, 1980

Coleman v. Brown

960 F. Supp. 2d 1057 · District Court, E.D. California · Jul 3, 2013

See Brown v. Plata, Sup.Ct. Docket No. 13A5, available at http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search. aspx? … All filings in this Three-Judge Court are included in the individual docket sheets of both Plata v. Brown, No. C01-1351 TEH (N.D.Cal.), and Coleman v. Brown, No. 90-cv-520-LKK (E.D.Cal.).

Nichols v. Brown

945 F. Supp. 2d 1079 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 3, 2013

Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. v. Brown, 124 F.3d 1179, 1183 (9th Cir.1997). … V.