Opinion

Brown v. Douglas

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Oct 23, 2014
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Amy Berman Jackson
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FTLED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 3

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clark. us. District 8. Bankruptcy

Courts for the District of Columbla

CHRISTINA BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. /¢' / 7 W

)

MICHAEL DOUGLAS, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on review of the plaintiffs application to proceed in

forma pauperis, her pro se civil complaint, and her motion for a temporary restraining order.

The Court will grant the application, deny the motion for injunctive relief, and dismiss the

complaint.

The plaintiff explains that she, the defendant, and Talia Suarez are roommates. See Pl.’s

Mot. for Temp. Restraining Order. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant “has been abusive and

physical in the past,” and that a “domestic violence dispute with his girlfriend Talia Suarez”

occurred recently at their home. Comp]. at 1. She further alleges that “police were involved” in

an incident on October 7, 2014, she since has “received threatening text messages from [the

defendant] and several of his friends.” Id. She fears for her safety, see id., and requests a

temporary restraining order, id. at 2. The plaintiff also seeks injunctive relief in order to prevent

the roommates’ eviction set for October 15, 2014. See Pl.’s Mot. for Temp. Restraining Order.

Federal district courts have jurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitution,

laws or treaties of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In addition, federal district courts

have jurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, and the suit

is between citizens of different states. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Plaintiff 3 claim neither

presents a federal question nor involves parties who reside in different states. Accordingly, the

complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

5 3

United States District Judge

DATE: \O\ZDl UW/

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.