Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.97s
United States v. Board of Com'rs
271 F. 747 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1921
In Ward v. Board of County Commissioners of Love County, Oklahoma, 253 U. S. 17 , 40 Sup. Ct. 419, 64 L. … Fink v. Board of County Commissioners, 248 U. S. 399 , 39 Sup. Ct. 128, 63 I,. Ed. 324.
Cited 1 timesPublishedArnold v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board
752 F. Supp. 249 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 15, 1990
Rose v. … Johnson v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · Nov 27, 2024
State v. Brown, 970 N.W.2d 809 (Neb. Ct. App. 2022); see also Filing No. 1 at 6. … State v. Brown, 980 N.W.2d 834 (Neb. 2022).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Nevada · Oct 11, 2024
Special Investments, Inc. v. … Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 4 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFry v. Board of County Commissioners
837 F. Supp. 330 · District Court, D. Colorado · Nov 6, 1991
Fry v. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Baca, slip op. 88-F-1788 (March 3, 1989). … Figures v. Board of Public Utils. of Kansas City, 731 F.Supp. 1479, 1483 (D.Kan.1990); Miller v. Campbell County, 722 F.Supp. 687, 696 (D.Wyo.1989); Ditch v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRambo v. Morehouse Parish School Board
37 F. Supp. 2d 482 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jan 19, 1999
Rambo asks this court to find defendants in contempt of its order of 1 May 1975 in the case of Hayes v. Morehouse Parish School Board, CV No. 74-951-M (“Hayes order”). … Second, the School Board’s misinterpretation of the Hayes order does not preclude a finding of contempt. See Morgan *487 v. Kerrigan, 509 F.2d 618 (1st Cir.1975).
Cited 1 timesPublishedTilghman v. Waterbury Board of Education
312 F. Supp. 2d 185 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Mar 25, 2004
She does not allege any wrongdoing by the Board. 8 Heard-McKnight’s discrimination claims against Borrelli are governed by the same three-step burden shifting analysis used above. See Terry v. … In Dollard v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTonkovich v. Kansas Board of Regents
924 F. Supp. 1084 · District Court, D. Kansas · Apr 30, 1996
United States v. Stenzel, 49 F.3d 658 (10th Cir.1995); Weatherhead v. Globe International, Inc., 832 F.2d 1226, 1227 (10th Cir.1987); Hinman v. Rogers, 831 F.2d 937 (10th Cir.1987). … United States v. Cooley, 1 F.3d 985, 993 (10th Cir.1993).
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · Jun 30, 2020
Brown Resp. at 7.) Indeed, in Aistrop v. … For example, in Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 20, 2024
Finally, the Court reminds Brown that a party’s “pro se status . . . do[es] not insulate him from the reach of Rule 11.” Carman v. Treat, 7 F.3d 1379, 1382 (8th Cir. 1993). … Galvan v. Cameron Mut. Ins. Co., 831 F.2d 804, 805 (8th Cir. 1987).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrown v. AW Brown Fellowship Leadership Academy
District Court, N.D. Texas · Nov 24, 2020
After Brown’s termination, Mimms wrote a letter to the board suggesting that Brown was the author of an anonymous letter to the board. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · Aug 29, 2019
Two of the five cases filed in this Court in the 1 past year have been dismissed as frivolous, Brown v. USPS PMG, C19-0295-RSM (Dkt. 9), and 2 Brown v. … Robinson, et al., C19-1330-JCC; and Brown v. Brennan, et al., C19-1331- 5 JLR. At least three other district courts have limited plaintiff’s ability to file new cases. See 6 Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · Sep 25, 2024
Response [ECF No. 29], Brown’s Reply to the Brown Response [ECF No. 30], and the applicable law. … Macias v. Salazar, No. 21-51127, 2022 WL 3044654, at *2 (Sth Cir. Aug. 2, 2022) (cleaned up). Brown can only be held liable in her individual capacity for her own participation in the alleged wrongdoing.
Cited 0 timesUnknownChadwell v. Lee County School Board
535 F. Supp. 2d 586 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Feb 4, 2008
See Martin v. … Smith v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNunley v. U. S. Board of Paroles
439 F. Supp. 887 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1977
mootness 429 U.S. 60 , 97 S.Ct. 342 , 50 L.Ed.2d 218 (1976); Brown v. … Lupo v. Norton, 371 F.Supp. 156 (D.Conn. 1974); Soloway v. Weger, 389 F.Supp. 409 (N.D.Pa.1974); Billiteri v. U. S. Board of Parole, 385 F.Supp. 1217 (W.D.N.Y.1974); Craft v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 20, 2025
McHenry v. … In 5 Hearns v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMidvale Paper Board Co. v. United States
31 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 20, 1940
See Chicago Telephone Supply Co. v. United States, ct. cl., 23 F.Supp. 471 ; Allied Agents, Inc. v. United States, ct.cl., 26 F.Supp. 98 ;. Rosoff Tunnel Corp. v. Higgins, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 880 . … Chicago Telephone Supply Co. v. United States [supra].” See also above-quotations from case of Haggar Company v. Helvering, supra.
Cited 11 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 19, 2025
Simon v. … Butko v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSheppard v. West Virginia Board of Regents
378 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Jul 9, 1974
Watts v. Board of Curators, University of Missouri, 363 F.Supp. 883 (W.D.Mo.1973); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Board of Regents v. … Chitwood v. Feaster, 468 F.2d 359 (4th Cir. 1972); Shumate v. Board of Education, 478 F.2d 233 (4th Cir. 1973); Watts v. Board of Curators, University of Missouri, supra-, Perry v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · Sep 16, 2024
Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. at 397, 404 (1997) (emphasis added). … Brown v. Bryan Cnty., 219 F.3d 450, 457 (5th Cir. 2000) (brackets omitted) (quoting City of Canton, 489 U.S. at 390).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna