Case law

Reeser v. Esmark, Inc., Pension Board

714 F. Supp. 412 · District Court, S.D. Iowa · Jun 9, 1989

court established a schedule for filing post-trial briefs, then allowed the filing of additional briefs on the question of the applicability of a recent United States *413 Supreme Court case, Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. … Pension Board (Board) for disability pensions under the plan. The Board denied the application, triggering this ERISA action. I. Standard of Review.

Wylie v. State Board of Equalization

21 F. Supp. 604 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 14, 1937

See Premier-Pabst Sales Company v. State Board of Equalization, D.C.Cal.1935, 13 F.Supp. 90 ; Mugler v. Kansas, 1887, 123 U.S. 623 , 8 S.Ct. 273 , 31 L.Ed. 205 . … As interpreted by the Supreme Court in State Board of Equalization v.

Acree v. County Board of Education

294 F. Supp. 1034 · District Court, S.D. Georgia · Dec 26, 1968

Green v. County School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430, at 439 , 88 S.Ct. 1689, at 1695 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716, at 724 . … Attention is called to Stell v. Board of Education for the City of Savannah and. Chatham County, 5 Cir., 387 F.2d 486 (1967).

Pate v. Dade County School Board

303 F. Supp. 1068 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 29, 1969

In 1956, following the landmark school integration cases of Brown v. … Mehrtens, the case of Gibson v. Board' of Public Instruction of Dade County, Florida is transferred to this division and consolidated with the case of Pate v. Dade County School Board presently in this division.

Lefkovits v. State Board of Elections

400 F. Supp. 1005 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 3, 1975

Lance v. Board of Education, 153 W.Va. 559 , 170 S.E.2d 783 (1969), noted in 83 Harv.L.R. 1911 (1970) . Reversing the decision of the West Virginia court, the Supreme Court first distinguished Gray and Cipriano . … The plaintiff makes the hold assertion that various minorities in Chicago (blacks, browns and the Polish) suffer a chilling effect because of the 60% requirement.

Horner v. County Board

828 F. Supp. 604 · District Court, C.D. Illinois · Jul 29, 1993

Wisconsin v. Constantineau, 400 U.S. 433, 437 , 91 S.Ct. 507, 510 , 27 L.Ed.2d 515 (1970); see also Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2707 , *608 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1971). … The charges leveled against the plaintiff prior to the Board meeting did not stigmatize the plaintiff’s reputation. See, e.g., Hadley v.

United Food & Com. Wkrs. Local 751 v. Brown Group

820 F. Supp. 1192 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 12, 1993

820 F.Supp. 1192 (1993) UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 751, As Representative of the Aggrieved Employees, Plaintiff, v. BROWN GROUP, INC., d/b/a Brown Shoe Company, Defendant. No. 4:92CV01134 ELF. … See, e.g., United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers, and Allied Trades No. 40 v. Insurance Corp. of Am., 919 F.2d 1398, 1400 (9th Cir.1990); Telecommunications Research & Action Ctr. v.

Brown v. Hudgins

District Court, N.D. West Virginia · Jan 17, 2023

Plaintiff, v. … Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and of a party’s right to appeal this Court’s Order. 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1); Snyder v.

Brown v. Ponce

District Court, E.D. Virginia · Dec 13, 2024

Brown with notice pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975). (ECF Nos. 43, 53.) Mr. Brown has filed several responses. (ECF Nos. 50, 51.) … Almy v. Grisham, 639 S.E.2d 182, 186 (Va. 2007) (citations omitted). At most, Mr. Brown states that “Ms.

Brown v. Carr

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Jun 28, 2022

Townsend v. Fuchs, 522 F.3d 765, 773 (7th Cir. 2008) (citing Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 832, 834 (1994)). … Gray v. Hardy, 826 F.3d 1000, 1005 (7th Cir. 2016) (citing Lewis v. Lane, 816 F.2d 1165, 1171 (7th Cir. 1987)). But “extreme deprivations” are required to prevail on a claim. Delaney v.

Lee v. MacOn County Board of Education

267 F. Supp. 458 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 22, 1967

It is quite clear that the defendants have abrogated, and openly continue to abrogate, their affirmative duty to effectuate the principles of Brown v. Board of Education, supra. … See, e. g., Franklin v. Barbour County Board of Education, 259 F.Supp. 545 (MD Ala.1906); Harris v. Crenshaw County Board of Education, 259 F.Supp. 107 (MD Ala.1966); Carr v.

Brown v. Gennrich

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · May 4, 2022

Bruce v. … Johnson v. McNeil, 217 F.3d 298, 300 (5th Cir. 2000) (citing Talley-Bey v. Knebl, 168 F.3d 884, 886-87 (6th Cir. 1999)).

Naugatuck Board of Education v. D.

10 F. Supp. 2d 170 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Jul 1, 1998

Board of Educ. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 179 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982). Such children include those with either “serious emotional disturbance[s]” or “specific learning disabilities.” … The court was persuaded by a line of eases that held school boards liable for residential placements of children having interrelated emotional and educational disabilities. See, e.g., Vander Malle v.

Brown v. Collins

District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Nov 19, 2020

PLAINTIFF ADC #111805 V. … Simmons v. Dodson, No. 14 CV167 ACL, 2016 WL 2958030, at *2 (E.D. Mo. May 23, 2016) (internal citation omitted). Courts “retain[] the discretion to refuse to issue Rule 45 subpoenas to nonparties . . . .”

Brown v. Murphy

District Court, W.D. Washington · Jul 18, 2023

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 25 664 (2009). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007).

Brown v. Fromolz

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Sep 23, 2022

The Court construes Brown’s motion to modify, alter, or vacate the judgment as a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See Borrero v. … P. 24(a); see also Celske v.

Brown v. Kijakazi

District Court, E.D. Washington · Nov 3, 2023

Sprague v. … Kail v.

Hibbard Brown & Co., Inc. v. ABC Family Trust

772 F. Supp. 894 · District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 20, 1991

See, e.g., Fraser v. Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 817 F.2d 250, 252 (4th Cir.1987); Kramer v. Hammond, 943 F.2d 176 (2d Cir.1991). I have two difficulties with this conventional formulation. … Cone Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 19-21 , 103 S.Ct. 927, 939 , 74 L.Ed.2d 765 (1983).

United States v. Yonkers Board of Education

587 F. Supp. 51 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 26, 1984

Texas, 381 U.S. 532 , 85 S.Ct. 1628 , 14 L.Ed.2d 543 ; Combined Communications Corp. v. Finesilver, 672 F.2d 818 (10th Cir.1982); Mazzetti v. United States, 518 F.2d 781 (10th Cir.1975). … Mazzetti v. United States, supra; Dorfman v. Meiszner, 430 F.2d 558 (7th Cir. 1970); In re Acuff, 331 F.Supp. 819 (D.C.N.M.1971).

Craig v. Selma City School Board

801 F. Supp. 585 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Aug 25, 1992

Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 220-21 , 102 S.Ct. 2382, 2396 , 72 L.Ed.2d 786 (1982), citing San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 35 , 93 S.Ct. 1278, 1298 , 36 L.Ed.2d 16 (1973). Brown v. … Moreover, the plaintiffs’ brief argues that the Board’s offer to allow Sametra Peasant, Sonya Brown, and Tonya Brown to participate in an alternative punishment scheme violated those students’ federal due process rights.