Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFD

10,000+ results

7.38s

  • Abelli v. Ansonia Board of Education

    987 F. Supp. 2d 170 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Dec 13, 2013

    There is support for the second approach in Board of Regents of State Colleges v. … See Bledsoe v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Burkey v. Marshall County Board of Education

    513 F. Supp. 1084 · District Court, N.D. West Virginia · May 20, 1981

    No board member shall be liable for any back pay for any period in which he was not a board member. 3. That Linda V. … Boggs v. Board of Education of day County, supra.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Roslyn Board of Education

    438 F. Supp. 2d 49 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 7, 2006

    On June 28, 2005, Donald Jackson (the “plaintiff’) commenced this action against the Roslyn Board of Education (the “Board”), the Roslyn Union Free School District (the “District”) (collectively, the “defendants”), and the … The plaintiff claims that he was informed that the District needed to “check” with the Board and the benefits carrier.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Iberville Parish School Board

    273 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Sep 5, 1967

    N.L.R.B. v. Standard Trouser Company, 4 Cir., 162 F.2d 1012 . … Notices were also posted on bulletin boards and in the newspapers.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Citizens' Utility Ratepayer Board v. McKee

    946 F. Supp. 893 · District Court, D. Kansas · Nov 13, 1996

    Precision Co. v. Koch Indus., Inc., 971 F.2d 548 , 551 (10th Cir.1992). United States district courts have original jurisdiction over actions arising under the laws of the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 1331 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • La Fleur v. Cleveland Board of Education

    326 F. Supp. 1208 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 12, 1971

    In Morey v. … Speaking of this right, the Supreme Court stated in Brown, et al. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States Department of Justice

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 2010

    BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action … Brown concedes that “OIP is an improper party to this action,” (Pl.’s Reply to Gov’t’s Opp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mogk v. City of Detroit

    335 F. Supp. 698 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Jul 22, 1971

    See, Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814 , 89 S.Ct. 1493 , 23 L.Ed.2d 1 , and Brockington v. Rhodes, 396 U.S. 41 , 90 S.Ct. 206 , 24 L. Ed.2d 209 . See also, Blumstein v. … Justice Stewart said: “We may assume that the appellants have no right to be appointed to the Taliaferro County board of education.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Martinez v. Paul Taylor Brown Co.

    6 P.R. Fed. 435 · District Court, D. Puerto Rico · Dec 15, 1913

    For instance, Jerman v. Stewart, 12 Fed. 277 ; O’Neil v. Kansas City, S. & M. R. Co. 31 Fed. 663 ; and Re Abraham, 35 C. C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Snyder

    District Court, E.D. Michigan · Oct 29, 2020

    West v. Saginaw Twp. Police Dep’t., 2014 WL 3599495, at *2 (E.D. Mich. July 22, 2014) (a pro se plaintiff is “not excused from failing to follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); Fields v. … .”); Kitchen v. Corizon Health Inc., 2018 WL 286425, at *4 (W.D. Mich.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. KEARSE EX REL. ESTATE OF GRANT

    481 F. Supp. 2d 515 · District Court, D. South Carolina · Mar 19, 2007

    Brown’s (“Brown” or “Plaintiff’) Motion to Remand. Defendant J. Morgan Kearse, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jim Grant, (“Kearse” or “Defendant”) has timely objected to this Motion. … Marler v. Amoco Oil Co., 793 F.Supp. 656, 658-59 (E.D.N.C.1992) (citations omitted); see also Leverton v. AlliedSignal, Inc. 991 F.Supp. 481, 483 (E.D.Va.1997).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Carter v. School Board of Arlington County

    87 F. Supp. 745 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Dec 7, 1949

    The complaint here is that in their operation of the public schools the School Board and Superintendent of Schools of Arlington County, Virginia, have discriminated against Negro students by failing to provide them, solely … Corbin et al. v. County School Board of Pulaski County, 177 F.2d 924 . Needs at Hoffman-Boston.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Spivey v. Board of Church Extension

    160 F.R.D. 660 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 24, 1995

    Defendant Board of Church Extension and Home Mission of the Church of God, Inc. (hereafter “Board of Church”), Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support (Doc. Nos. 84-85), and response thereto (Doc. … Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 , 83 S.Ct. 227, 230 , 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Gemalo

    130 F. Supp. 500 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 25, 1955

    The respondent asserts that, in the absence of a duly appointed General Counsel to the Board, the Board is without authority to prosecute the complaint which had been issued. … The applicant asserts that this is not such a case because of the earlier decision in this circuit: Bonwit Teller, Inc., v. N. L. R.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sewell v. Brown

    District Court, E.D. Michigan · Jun 4, 2020

    Michelson v. … MIKE BROWN, Respondent.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Johnson v. Board of Police Com'rs

    351 F. Supp. 2d 929 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 14, 2004

    351 F.Supp.2d 929 (2004) Chad JOHNSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS: Jo Ann Freeman, et al., Defendants. No. 4:04 CV 01266 ERW. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. … See, e.g., Doctor's Assocs., Inc. v. Stuart, 85 F.3d 975, 985 (2d Cir.1996); Kaepa, Inc. v. Achilles Corp., 76 F.3d 624, 628 (5th Cir.1996); Miller v. Carlson, 768 F.Supp. 1331 (N.D.Cal.1991); Brown v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Board of Com'rs

    26 F. Supp. 270 · District Court, D. South Dakota · Feb 14, 1939

    See United States v. Pierce County, D.C., 193 F. 529 ; Bannon v. Burnes, C. C., 39 F. 892, 893 ; United States v. City of Buffalo, 2 Cir., 54 F.2d 471 . … The following cases are cited in the Sinclair-Prairie case in support of the proposition: New England Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 121 Okl. 277 , 249 P. 914 ; Board of County Commissioners v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kittrell v. Brown

    District Court, E.D. Virginia · Aug 7, 2025

    Brown as defendants.' … See Shaw v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Coles v. Cleveland Board of Education

    950 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 17, 1996

    In Lee v. … In Marsh v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    306 F. Supp. 1291 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 15, 1969

    In Brown v. … Sixteen years after Brown v. Board of Education, some thirteen thousand school children will remain in black or nearly all-black schools. Most white students will remain in substantially all-white schools.

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.