Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFD

10,000+ results

0.72s

  • Cole v. BUCHANAN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

    661 F. Supp. 2d 569 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Oct 1, 2009

    Cash v. Granville County Bd. of Educ., 242 F.3d 219, 223 (4th Cir.2001). … Virginia’s autonomous county school districts contrast sharply with the Maryland county school board examined in Lewis v. Board of Education of Talbot County, 262 F.Supp.2d 608 (D.Md.2003).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Davison v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors

    267 F. Supp. 3d 702 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jul 25, 2017

    Louis v. … Eichenlaub v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Durling v. Chairman, Massachusetts Parole Board

    789 F. Supp. 457 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 1, 1992

    Brown was not present; however, Bruce testified at two court proceedings which did not involve Brown that the guns were Brown’s and that Brown had given him the guns. … However, Bruce refused to testify at Brown’s probation revocation hearing. The state offered Bruce’s prior testimony at the two earlier hearings; on the basis of that testimony, Brown’s probation was revoked. Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cholmakjian v. Board of Trustees

    315 F. Supp. 1335 · District Court, W.D. Michigan · Aug 12, 1970

    Defendants include the Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, University President Clifton R. … Bartlett & Co., Grain v. State Corp. Comm., 223 F.Supp. 975 (D.C.Kan.1963), Evergreen Review, Inc. v. Cahn, 230 F.Supp. 498 (D.C.N.Y. 1964), Maison v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Morgal v. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors

    284 F.R.D. 452 · District Court, D. Arizona · Jun 6, 2012

    That is because the Board focused almost exclusively upon untimeliness, prejudice and futility— *461 factors which, in accordance with Foman v. … Therefore, the bulk of the Board’s response was not directly relevant. . Opposing amendment, the Board, purporting to quote from Scognamillo v.

    Cited 149 timesPublished
  • United States ex rel. Brown v. Malcolm

    350 F. Supp. 496 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 13, 1972

    After holding such a hearing the trial court found Brown’s conviction untainted and directed him to appear for resentencing on September 9, *498 1970. See United States v. Brown, supra n. 2. … It would also appear there is serious question as to Brown’s standing to challenge a writ ad prosequendum. See Bullock v. Mississippi, 404 F.2d 75 (5 Cir. 1968); McDonald v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Sawulski

    158 B.R. 971 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Sep 13, 1993

    In N.L.R.B. v. … Similarly, in US Sprint Communications Co. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Diggins v. Faulkner County Detention Center

    District Court, E.D. Arkansas · May 9, 2022

    Louis County Board of Police Commissioners 217 F.3d 955, 959 (8th Cir. 2000)). The Court denies the motion. … (citing Alberson v. Norris, 458 F.3d 762, 765-66 (8th Cir. 2006); Robinson v. Hager, 292 F.3d 560, 564 (8th Cir. 2002)). In Alberson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

    664 F. Supp. 969 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1987

    Brown relies on the case of Melso v. Texaco, Inc., 532 F.Supp. 1280 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 696 F.2d 983 (3rd Cir.1982). … Id., citing The Bremen v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Thana v. Board of License Commissioners

    104 F. Supp. 3d 711 · District Court, D. Maryland · May 14, 2015

    The man considered to be the "Godfather of Go-Go," Chuck Brown, was a- resident of Charles County, Maryland, and resided in Waldorf, Maryland until his death in 2012. Compl. ¶ 9. . … Mem. 19, the statute of limitations would remain a significant barrier to Plaintiffs' claims arising out of the Board's actions in 2012. See Wormwood v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Roslyn Board of Education

    652 F. Supp. 2d 332 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 3, 2009

    The plaintiff previously instituted a civil rights action against the defendants and against then Assistant Superintendent Madalyn McGovern, entitled Jackson v. Board of Education, et al., 02CV3939. … Giglio v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Brady v. Board of Education

    10 N.J. Misc. 358 · United States District Court · Feb 16, 1932

    The law is plainly mandatory upon the custodian to pay upon the order of a board of education upon being passed to him in a legal form. In the case of Zimmerman v. Mathe, 49 N. J. … The case of Barnet v. Paterson, 48 N. J. L. 395, does not govern the matter sub judice.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Waldron v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 3, 2025

    Defendants Chris Brown and CBE Touring, LLC (together, “Mr. Brown”) filed a Response to the Motion. (Resp., ECF No. 81.) Although Mr. … Co. v. DML Real Estate Invs. and Constr., LLC, et al., Case No. 202250234 (Tex. 11th Dist. Ct. Mar. 20, 2025), “concern the same concert, will involve the same defenses, and DML and [Mr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Nat. Union Fire Ins. of Pittsburgh v. Brown

    787 F. Supp. 1424 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 4, 1991

    Brown was Chairman of the Board of Directors of GDC from 1985 to 1990. Mr. Ehr-ling was President of GDC from 1980 to 1990, and was a member of the Board of Directors of GDC at all relevant times. Mr. … See Continental Casualty Co. v. Board of Educ., 302 Md. 516 , 489 A.2d 536, 539, 543 (1985) (distinguishable because the school’s board of education policy contained an option clause); Amrep Corp. v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Daniels v. Board of Trustees

    841 F. Supp. 363 · District Court, D. Kansas · Dec 2, 1993

    Norton v. … In Kinmonth v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Consumer Advisory Board v. Glover

    151 F.R.D. 496 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 30, 1993

    The Court will deny the Motion to Dissolve because Defendants have failed to sustain their burden of proof as established in Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools *498 v. … The ruling was appealed by Plaintiffs to the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit which vacated the dismissal and remanded the case in Consumer Advisory Board v. Glover, 989 F.2d 65 (1st Cir.1993).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. EG & G Mound Applied Technologies, Inc.

    117 F. Supp. 2d 671 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 24, 2000

    Plaintiff recalls being told by Defendant that the Cassini Mission would be completed in 2005 (Id., Brown Dep. at 98). … Plaintiff relies on Ercegovich v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Dabrieo v. Massachusetts Parole Board

    94 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 26, 2015

    P. 15(c)(1)(B); see Mayle v. … Lynch v. Hubbard, 47 F.Supp.2d 125, 127 (D.Mass.1999).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. Chicago Board of Education

    261 F. Supp. 3d 880 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 8, 2017

    Gettleman, United States District Judge Plaintiff Deborah Rogers has filed a four count 1 complaint against her employer, Chicago Board of Education, alleging discrimination. … Dargis v. Sheahan, 526 F.3d 981, 988 (7th Cir. 2008) (quoting E.E.O.C. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 417 F.3d 789, 805 (7th Cir. 2005)).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown-Marx Associates, Ltd. v. Emigrant Savings Bank

    527 F. Supp. 277 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Dec 7, 1981

    In Vincent v. … Broyles v. Brown Engineering Co., 275 Ala. 35 , 151 So.2d 767 (1963). The failure of a party to act in good faith may be evidence that a contract has been breached. California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.