Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.72s
Cole v. BUCHANAN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
661 F. Supp. 2d 569 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Oct 1, 2009
Cash v. Granville County Bd. of Educ., 242 F.3d 219, 223 (4th Cir.2001). … Virginia’s autonomous county school districts contrast sharply with the Maryland county school board examined in Lewis v. Board of Education of Talbot County, 262 F.Supp.2d 608 (D.Md.2003).
Cited 4 timesPublishedDavison v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors
267 F. Supp. 3d 702 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jul 25, 2017
Louis v. … Eichenlaub v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedDurling v. Chairman, Massachusetts Parole Board
789 F. Supp. 457 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 1, 1992
Brown was not present; however, Bruce testified at two court proceedings which did not involve Brown that the guns were Brown’s and that Brown had given him the guns. … However, Bruce refused to testify at Brown’s probation revocation hearing. The state offered Bruce’s prior testimony at the two earlier hearings; on the basis of that testimony, Brown’s probation was revoked. Brown v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCholmakjian v. Board of Trustees
315 F. Supp. 1335 · District Court, W.D. Michigan · Aug 12, 1970
Defendants include the Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, University President Clifton R. … Bartlett & Co., Grain v. State Corp. Comm., 223 F.Supp. 975 (D.C.Kan.1963), Evergreen Review, Inc. v. Cahn, 230 F.Supp. 498 (D.C.N.Y. 1964), Maison v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMorgal v. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
284 F.R.D. 452 · District Court, D. Arizona · Jun 6, 2012
That is because the Board focused almost exclusively upon untimeliness, prejudice and futility— *461 factors which, in accordance with Foman v. … Therefore, the bulk of the Board’s response was not directly relevant. . Opposing amendment, the Board, purporting to quote from Scognamillo v.
Cited 149 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. Brown v. Malcolm
350 F. Supp. 496 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 13, 1972
After holding such a hearing the trial court found Brown’s conviction untainted and directed him to appear for resentencing on September 9, *498 1970. See United States v. Brown, supra n. 2. … It would also appear there is serious question as to Brown’s standing to challenge a writ ad prosequendum. See Bullock v. Mississippi, 404 F.2d 75 (5 Cir. 1968); McDonald v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Sawulski
158 B.R. 971 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Sep 13, 1993
In N.L.R.B. v. … Similarly, in US Sprint Communications Co. v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedDiggins v. Faulkner County Detention Center
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · May 9, 2022
Louis County Board of Police Commissioners 217 F.3d 955, 959 (8th Cir. 2000)). The Court denies the motion. … (citing Alberson v. Norris, 458 F.3d 762, 765-66 (8th Cir. 2006); Robinson v. Hager, 292 F.3d 560, 564 (8th Cir. 2002)). In Alberson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrown v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
664 F. Supp. 969 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1987
Brown relies on the case of Melso v. Texaco, Inc., 532 F.Supp. 1280 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 696 F.2d 983 (3rd Cir.1982). … Id., citing The Bremen v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedThana v. Board of License Commissioners
104 F. Supp. 3d 711 · District Court, D. Maryland · May 14, 2015
The man considered to be the "Godfather of Go-Go," Chuck Brown, was a- resident of Charles County, Maryland, and resided in Waldorf, Maryland until his death in 2012. Compl. ¶ 9. . … Mem. 19, the statute of limitations would remain a significant barrier to Plaintiffs' claims arising out of the Board's actions in 2012. See Wormwood v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJackson v. Roslyn Board of Education
652 F. Supp. 2d 332 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 3, 2009
The plaintiff previously instituted a civil rights action against the defendants and against then Assistant Superintendent Madalyn McGovern, entitled Jackson v. Board of Education, et al., 02CV3939. … Giglio v.
Cited 21 timesPublished10 N.J. Misc. 358 · United States District Court · Feb 16, 1932
The law is plainly mandatory upon the custodian to pay upon the order of a board of education upon being passed to him in a legal form. In the case of Zimmerman v. Mathe, 49 N. J. … The case of Barnet v. Paterson, 48 N. J. L. 395, does not govern the matter sub judice.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 3, 2025
Defendants Chris Brown and CBE Touring, LLC (together, “Mr. Brown”) filed a Response to the Motion. (Resp., ECF No. 81.) Although Mr. … Co. v. DML Real Estate Invs. and Constr., LLC, et al., Case No. 202250234 (Tex. 11th Dist. Ct. Mar. 20, 2025), “concern the same concert, will involve the same defenses, and DML and [Mr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNat. Union Fire Ins. of Pittsburgh v. Brown
787 F. Supp. 1424 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 4, 1991
Brown was Chairman of the Board of Directors of GDC from 1985 to 1990. Mr. Ehr-ling was President of GDC from 1980 to 1990, and was a member of the Board of Directors of GDC at all relevant times. Mr. … See Continental Casualty Co. v. Board of Educ., 302 Md. 516 , 489 A.2d 536, 539, 543 (1985) (distinguishable because the school’s board of education policy contained an option clause); Amrep Corp. v.
Cited 27 timesPublished841 F. Supp. 363 · District Court, D. Kansas · Dec 2, 1993
Norton v. … In Kinmonth v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedConsumer Advisory Board v. Glover
151 F.R.D. 496 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 30, 1993
The Court will deny the Motion to Dissolve because Defendants have failed to sustain their burden of proof as established in Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools *498 v. … The ruling was appealed by Plaintiffs to the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit which vacated the dismissal and remanded the case in Consumer Advisory Board v. Glover, 989 F.2d 65 (1st Cir.1993).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. EG & G Mound Applied Technologies, Inc.
117 F. Supp. 2d 671 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 24, 2000
Plaintiff recalls being told by Defendant that the Cassini Mission would be completed in 2005 (Id., Brown Dep. at 98). … Plaintiff relies on Ercegovich v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDabrieo v. Massachusetts Parole Board
94 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 26, 2015
P. 15(c)(1)(B); see Mayle v. … Lynch v. Hubbard, 47 F.Supp.2d 125, 127 (D.Mass.1999).
Cited 0 timesPublishedRogers v. Chicago Board of Education
261 F. Supp. 3d 880 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 8, 2017
Gettleman, United States District Judge Plaintiff Deborah Rogers has filed a four count 1 complaint against her employer, Chicago Board of Education, alleging discrimination. … Dargis v. Sheahan, 526 F.3d 981, 988 (7th Cir. 2008) (quoting E.E.O.C. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 417 F.3d 789, 805 (7th Cir. 2005)).
Cited 3 timesPublishedBrown-Marx Associates, Ltd. v. Emigrant Savings Bank
527 F. Supp. 277 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Dec 7, 1981
In Vincent v. … Broyles v. Brown Engineering Co., 275 Ala. 35 , 151 So.2d 767 (1963). The failure of a party to act in good faith may be evidence that a contract has been breached. California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v.
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna