Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.11s
Shanahan v. Denison University
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 2, 2025
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States, 201 F.2d 819, 822 (6th Cir. 1953). The Court will not take the drastic measure of striking all of Ms. … (quoting Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc., 545 F. App’x 368, 372 (6th Cir. 2013))). IV.
Cited 0 timesUnknown996 F. Supp. 809 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 2, 1998
Cheek v. Western & S. Life Ins. Co., 31 F.3d 497, 500 (7th Cir.1994). … Ins., Inc., 538 F.2d 164, 168 (7th Cir.1976) (en banc) (quoting Willis v. Chicago Extruded Metals Co., 375 F.Supp. 362, 365-66 (N.D.Ill.1974)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedRedman v. Terrebonne Parish School Board
293 F. Supp. 376 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Dec 6, 1967
V. … The Marshal shall serve each of defendant school boards with a copy of this decree.
Cited 5 timesPublished462 F. Supp. 509 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Aug 18, 1978
See Dumschat v. Board of Pardons, supra. … Johnson v. Chairman of New York State Board of Parole, 500 F.2d 925 (2d Cir.), vacated as moot, 419 U.S. 1015 , 95 S.Ct. 488 , 42 L.Ed.2d 289 (1974); Zurak v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · Oct 5, 2023
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 MAURICE ANTHONY BROWN … Ma v. Univ. of S. 25 California, 2019 WL 1239269, slip op. at 1 (W.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrown-McKee, Inc. v. Fiatallis Construction MacHinery, Inc.
587 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Jun 19, 1984
(citing Wilko v. Swan, 346 U.S. 427 , 74 S.Ct. 182 , 98 L.Ed. 168 (1953); Smoky Greenhaw Cotton v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 720 F.2d 1446 (5th Cir.1983); Miley v. … Such resulted in the hardship and a prejudice to Brown-McKee even though some of the data could be used before an arbitration board or in defense of any subsequent suit.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Maryland · Oct 7, 2022
(quoting Brown v. Nucor Corp., 785 F.3d 895, 923 (4th Cir. 2015) (Agee, J. dissenting))). … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknown72 F. Supp. 948 · District Court, E.D. South Carolina · Jul 12, 1947
See Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 , 16 S.Ct. 1138 , 41 L.Ed. 256 ; McCabe v. Atchison T. & S. F. R. Co., 235 U.S. 151 , 35 S.Ct. 69 , 59 L.Ed. 169 ; Gong Lum v. … Canada, D.C., 32 F.Supp. 707 ; Bluford v. Canada, 348 Mo. 298 , 153 S.W.2d 14 ; Michael v. Witham, 179 Tenn. 250 , 165 S.W.2d 378 ; Sipuel v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, 180 P.2d 135 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedGillin v. Federal Paper Board Co.
52 F.R.D. 383 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Feb 15, 1970
Gillin was an employee of the defendant, Federal Paper Board Co., Inc., between 1957 and July 18, 1966. She claims she worked as the assistant traffic manager for the firm for five years prior to March, 1966. … See Hart v. Buckeye Industries, Inc., 46 F.R.D. 61, 62-63 (S.D. Ga.1968) ; King v. Georgia Power Company, 295 F.Supp. 943, 948-949 (N.D.Ga. 1968). . See, e. g., Johnson v.
Reversed in part, on other grounds by Nancy A. GILLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL PAPER BOARD COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee, 479 F.2d 97 (1973)Cited 18 timesPublished421 F. Supp. 363 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 16, 1976
Draeger v. Grand Central, Inc., C.A.10th *364 (1974), 504 F.2d 142, 146 [7]. For such reason, the plaintiff failed to state a claim herein against Kuhn’s Big K Stores, Incorporated, on which relief can be granted.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFlorence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
595 F. Supp. 2d 492 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 4, 2009
See Iberia Foods Corp. v. Romeo, Jr., 150 F.3d 298, 302 (3d Cir.1998) (citing Ciarlante v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 143 F.3d 139 , 145-46 (3d Cir.1998)). B. … v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedHarris v. Board of Trustees University
846 F. Supp. 2d 1223 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Feb 27, 2012
In support of its immunity argument, the Board of Trustees cites to Quern v. Jordan, 440 U.S. 332 , 99 S.Ct. 1139 , 59 L.Ed.2d 358 (1979), Kimel v. … Hutchinson v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Alabama, 288 Ala. 20 , 256 So.2d 281, 283 (1971). Additionally, under § 14, state agencies are “absolutely immune from suit.” Lyons v.
Cited 31 timesPublishedMay v. Board of County Commissioners
945 F. Supp. 2d 1277 · District Court, D. New Mexico · May 6, 2013
Browning v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 396 Fed.Appx. 496, 505-06 (10th Cir.2010)(unpublished). In McMahon v. … Foamex Int’l, 884 F.Supp.2d 1186, 1208 (D.N.M.2012)(Browning, J.)(quoting Carroll v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedSuhre v. Board of Commissioners
894 F. Supp. 927 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 28, 1995
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. … V.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Shoe Corp. v. Brown Group, Inc.
740 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 11, 1990
Shoe”), asserts trademark violation and unfair competition against Brown Group, Inc., in connection with the advertising and sale of women’s dress shoes. … See Haagen-Dazs v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · Jul 8, 2020
Wessels, Arnold, & Henderson v. Nat’l Med. … (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 2022
Tanner-Brown and HIFF lacked Article III standing. See Tanner-Brown v. Haaland, No. 21-cv-565, 2022 WL 2643556 (D.D.C. July 8, 2022). … See Tanner-Brown v. Haaland, 2022 WL 2643556, at *1–2. As such, the Court only briefly recounts the relevant facts here. A.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerican Federation of Government Employees v. Brown
481 F. Supp. 711 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 1979
Brown. … In Board of Regents v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBrown v. First Tennessee Bank National Ass'n
753 F. Supp. 2d 1249 · District Court, N.D. Georgia · Nov 20, 2009
Brown amended his Complaint, this filing is not a responsive pleading for Rule 15 purposes. Williams v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. Sys. of Ga., 477 F.3d 1282 , 1291 (11th Cir.2007). … Brown relies on United States v. Philip Morris Inc., 263 F.Supp.2d 72 (D.D.C.2003).
Cited 1 timesPublishedMyers v. Loudoun County School Board
251 F. Supp. 2d 1262 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Feb 21, 2003
See Brown v. Gilmore, 258 F.3d 265 , 273-74 (4th Cir.2001). Broadly stated, “[b]oth clauses are designed to protect religious liberty.” Id. at 274 (citations omitted). … Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234, 255 , 77 S.Ct. 1203 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1311 (1957); see also Brown v.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna