Case law

Richards v. Fairfax County School Board

798 F. Supp. 338 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Sep 2, 1992

Doyle v. Arlington County Sch. Bd., 953 F.2d 100, 105 (4th Cir.1991); see also David D. v. Dartmouth Sch. … Cox v. Stanton, 529 F.2d at 50 .

Dumschat v. Board of Pardons

462 F. Supp. 509 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Aug 18, 1978

See Dumschat v. Board of Pardons, supra. … Johnson v. Chairman of New York State Board of Parole, 500 F.2d 925 (2d Cir.), vacated as moot, 419 U.S. 1015 , 95 S.Ct. 488 , 42 L.Ed.2d 289 (1974); Zurak v.

Dowell v. Board of Education

606 F. Supp. 1548 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1985

is found to be in full compliance with the teachings of the Brown case.” … Id.; see Bell v. Board of Education, 683 F.2d 963 (6th Cir.1982); L.A. Unified School District v. L.A.

In Re Franklin Mutual Funds Fee Litigation

388 F. Supp. 2d 451 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 22, 2005

In Haas v. … Indeed, there is no indication how many directors were on the boards of these funds, or which directors sat on these boards, except for an allegation that Charles B. Johnson sat on each and every board.

Gregory v. Board of Governors

496 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 3, 1980

Mead Data Central, Inc. v. U.S.A.F., 575 F.2d 932 (D.C.Cir.1978). In the instant case, the proposed order and press release reflect the advice of an employee of the Federal Reserve Board. … Inc. v. Export-Import Bank of U.S., 464 F.Supp. 804 (D.D.C.1979). The Board has failed to show the Court any tangible harm to the borrower, much less the substantial harm required by Campbell, supra.

Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board

190 F. Supp. 861 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Dec 21, 1960

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 . 2. … Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S, 294, 299-301, 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 . 4.

King v. Board of Regents

748 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Oct 4, 1990

This court then awarded King $60,000 in compensatory damages against Sonstein, the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. … The Court in Missouri v.

Board of Trade v. Milligan

16 F. Supp. 859 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 11, 1936

In the case of Board of Trade of Chicago v. Olsen, 262 U.S. 1 , 43 S.Ct. 470 , 67 L.Ed. 839 , practically identical questions were presented in the challenge there lodged to the constitutionality of that act. … Wallace, 258 U.S. 495, 519 , 42 S.Ct. 397, 403 , 66 L.Ed. 735 , 23 A.L.R. 229 ; Board of Trade of Chicago v. Olsen, 262 U.S. 1, 35 , 43 S.Ct. 470, 476 , 67 L.Ed. 839 ; Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v.

Corbin v. County School Board

283 F. Supp. 60 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · May 16, 1963

The infant Negro plaintiffs made timely application to the Pupil Placement Board for admission to the Loudoun County High School for the school year 1962-63. … None of the parents or guardians of these children requested a hearing or review by the Pupil Placement Board as provided by the Pupil Placement Act.

Liddell v. Board of Education

696 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 5, 1988

The City Board has filed a reply to the State’s Response, L(2085)88. Rockwood requests a two-year extension to meet its Plan Ratio. This extension has been agreed to by Rockwood, both plaintiffs and the City Board. … If the plaintiffs and the City Board have agreed to assist Rock-wood, then this Court will not interfere.

Liddell v. Board of Education

758 F. Supp. 499 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 18, 1991

Liddell V, 677 F.2d 626, 636 (8th Cir.1982), cert. den. 459 U.S. 877 , 103 S.Ct. 172 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982) and Liddell XI, 822 F.2d 1446 , 1455 (8th Cir.1987). … Liddell V, at 636, n. 21; Liddell XI, at 1455, n. 18.

Erskine v. Board of Education

197 F. Supp. 2d 399 · District Court, D. Maryland · Apr 22, 2002

Seemuller v. Fairfax County School Board, 878 F.2d 1578, 1581 (4th Cir.1989), citing Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 , 107 S.Ct. 2891 , 97 L.Ed.2d 315 (1987). … Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 *407 U.S. 532, 538, 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985), citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-578 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Brown v. Berkeley County School District

339 F. Supp. 2d 715 · District Court, D. South Carolina · Oct 6, 2004

Brown (“Brown” or plaintiff) filed a complaint in this court against defendant Berkeley County School District (“BCSD” or defendant) alleging 1) “wrongful failure to hire in violation of Title VII of the Civil Right [sic] … (Brown Aff. at 7.)

OJO v. BERGEN COUNTY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 23, 2021

(Ojo v. Decker, Civ. No. 20-5538, D.E. 14.) … Pa. 2013) (noting that although this standard typically applies to municipal entities, it “applies with equal force to supervisory liability claims premised on a ‘policy, practice, or custom’ theory” (citing Brown v.

OJO v. HUDSON COUNTY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 23, 2021

(Ojo v. Decker, Civ. No. 20-5538, D.E. 14.) … Pa. 2013) (noting that although this standard typically applies to municipal entities, it “applies with equal force to supervisory liability claims premised on a ‘policy, practice, or custom’ theory” (citing Brown v.

ZIGLER v. WARREN

District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 28, 2022

West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988). … Pa. 2013) (noting that although this standard typically applies to municipal entities, it “applies with equal force to supervisory liability claims premised on a ‘policy, practice, or custom’ theory” (citing Brown v.

Liddell v. Board of Education

771 F. Supp. 1493 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 27, 1991

The State and the City Board have filed responses. L(3443)91 and L(3444)91, respectively. The City Board has also filed a reply to the State’s response. L(3458)91. … Anything beyond this is left to the City Board alone to fund.

Suhre v. Board of Commissioners

894 F. Supp. 927 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 28, 1995

Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. … V.

Tinker v. Board of Sup'rs

292 F. 863 · District Court, N.D. Iowa · Aug 18, 1923

The notice of petition for removal was addressed to the respective members of such board in their proper names and to the board of supervisors. … Morris, Board of Supervisors, of Kossuth County, Iowa, by T. P. Harrington, Their Attorney.” Presumbly Mr. Harrington had advised the board of supervisors in hearings before, that body.

Battle v. Clark Equipment, Brown Trailer Division

524 F. Supp. 683 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Oct 21, 1981

In Delaware State College v. … Dubois v. Packard Bell Corp., 470 F.2d 973 (10th Cir. 1972); Bennett v. Conrail, 26 FEP Cases 342, 344 (W.D.Mich.1981); Mobley v. Acme Markets, Inc., 473 F.Supp. 851 (D.Md. 1979); Wiltshire v.