Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFD

10,000+ results

0.97s

  • Lincoln National Health & Casualty Insurance v. Brown

    782 F. Supp. 110 · District Court, M.D. Georgia · Jan 22, 1992

    Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 , 109 S.Ct. 1197 , 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989). … Company v. Hilde, 172 Ga.App. 161 , 322 S.E.2d 285, 288 (1984); Welch v. Gulf Ins. Co., 126 Ga.App. 115 , 190 S.E.2d 101 (1972). The other provision is disregarded.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Griffin v. State Board of Education

    296 F. Supp. 1178 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Feb 11, 1969

    Those judgments were delivered in Poindexter v. Louisiana Financial System Commission, 275 F.Supp. 833 (E.D.La., 3-judge, 1967) and J. Arthur Brown v. … Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 , 78 S.Ct. 1401 , 3 L.Ed.2d 5 (1958) ; Brown v. Board of Education, etc., 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). 3 . Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended § 22-115.30. 4 .

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States Steel Corp.

    698 F. Supp. 1375 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 10, 1988

    See Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 489 U.S. 24 , 25, 99 S.Ct. 295, 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978). … Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24, 25 , 99 S.Ct. 295, 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978). The employer must merely present evidence to justify-a judgment in its favor.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Erickson v. Social Security Board

    52 F. Supp. 424 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 6, 1943

    . § 405 (g), to review the final decision of the Social Security Board and to recover the sum of $40.50 claimed to be due to plaintiff under the act. … It seems that even under the Board’s definition of Section 209(f) the wages earned from January 1, 1939, should have been included in the computation.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cohen v. Chesterfield County School Board

    326 F. Supp. 1159 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · May 17, 1971

    Goesaert v. … Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183, 192 , 73 S.Ct. 215, 219 , 97 L.Ed. 216 (1952). See also Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967).

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Olinger v. Renville County

    District Court, D. Minnesota · Nov 12, 2019

    Throneberry v. McGehee Desha Cty. Hosp., 403 F.3d 972, 977 (8th Cir. 2005); see also Brown v. … See Brown v. City of Jacksonville, 711 F.3d 883, 891 (8th Cir. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Goss v. Board of Education

    270 F. Supp. 903 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 7, 1967

    An order was entered on that date by the Court directing the School Board to submit on or before April 8,1960 a plan to bring about a good faith compliance with the decision in Brown v. Board of Education, supra. … Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, Va., 345 F.2d 310 (C.A. 4); Wheeler v. Durham City Board of Education, 346 F.2d 768 (C.A. 4); Goss v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. American Enka Corp.

    452 F. Supp. 154 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 7, 1976

    Heard v. Mueller Company, C.A. 6th (1972), 464 F.2d 190, 193 . … Terrell v. Feldstein Company, Inc., C.A. 5th (1972), 468 F.2d 910, 911 [1].

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Trujillo v. Board of Education

    229 F.R.D. 232 · District Court, D. New Mexico · May 18, 2005

    MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Pro Se Plaintiffs Rule 60(b) Motion and Brief for Reconsideration, filed March 29, 2004 (Doc. 120). … Green, 2005 WL 1661732 , 376 F.Supp.2d 1043, 1049 (D.N.M.2005)(Browning, J.); Shannon v. United States, No. CIV 02-717, at 3-4 (D.N.M. August 11, 2004)(Black, J.)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cash Management Trust of America

    963 F. Supp. 504 · District Court, D. Maryland · May 8, 1997

    Under the terms of the account, both signatures — plaintiffs and Rodcita Brown’s — were required to negotiate a check. … Billings v. East River Savings Bank, 33 A.D.2d 997 , 307 N.Y.S.2d 606, 607 (N.Y.App.Div.1970); see Weiner v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Pesca v. Board of Trustees

    176 F.R.D. 110 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 3, 1997

    Pesca’s counsel presented his argument before a regular meeting of the Fund’s board. He maintained that he believed that the Fund had suppressed information — specifically, a list of employers for whom Mr. … V 16. . Nemaizer v. Baker, 793 F.2d 58, 61 (2d Cir. 1986) (quoted in Martin v. Chemical Bank, 940 F.Supp. 56, 58-59 (S.D.N.Y.1996)). . See, e.g., Campaniello Imports, Ltd. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 2011

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is appropriate when a complaint fails “to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” Fed. … Co. v. Zenith Radio, 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goodman v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

    891 F. Supp. 505 · District Court, D. Arizona · Dec 7, 1993

    In Leikvold v. … In Reid v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Rawlings Financial Services, LLC

    211 F. Supp. 3d 480 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Sep 30, 2016

    Brown’s cause of action would have expired on August 7, 2015. This case commenced on Oct. 15, 2015. See Rocco v. … Brown’s complaint, the Court concludes that all of her claims are time- *486 barred. Ms. Brown’s cause of action expired on August 7, 2015, several months before her complaint was filed. V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT

    680 F. Supp. 2d 424 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 26, 2010

    Brown v. Astoria Federal Savings, No. 28177-2005, 2007 WL 5958108 (N.Y.Sup.Ct. … Tours, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp.

    821 F. Supp. 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 1993

    See Chevron, U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837, 842 , 104 S.Ct. 2778, 2781 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 . … When an agency interprets an ambiguous statutory provision, the second prong of Chevron, U.S.A. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. LaSalle Northwest National Bank

    148 F.R.D. 584 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 25, 1993

    However, as plaintiff recognizes, if the FTC regulation does not apply to Brown’s transaction, plaintiff has no RICO claim. … As to Brown, the allegations sufficiently identify the transaction involved and the loan document that contains the allegedly fraudulent omission. See Bankers Trust Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Delaware River Port Authority

    10 F. Supp. 3d 556 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 28, 2014

    BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Andre Brown, is an African-American police sergeant with defendant Delaware River Port Authority (“DRPA”). … See Scott v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Allen v. School Board of Charlottesville

    203 F. Supp. 225 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Dec 18, 1961

    In the area of high school attendance it is plain that the practices in force cannot be approved in the light of the Court of Appeals opinion in Dodson v. School Board. … I have carefully considered what was said by the Court of Appeals in its opinion in Dodson v. School Board and have carefully considered the steps to be taken to satisfy the criticisms there made.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Berjikian v. Franchise Tax Board

    93 F. Supp. 3d 1151 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 12, 2015

    Board of Educ. of the Lynwood Unified School Dist., 149 F.3d 971 , 983 (9th Cir.1998). … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.