Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFD

10,000+ results

2.35s

  • Doe v. Montgomery County Board of Education

    District Court, D. Maryland · May 30, 2025

    To argue it was not on notice of Murray’s behavior, the Board relies on Howard v. … The Board is a state agency. See Bd. of Educ. of Balt. Cnty. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Connecticut Performing Arts Foundation, Inc. v. Brown

    47 B.R. 911 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Jan 7, 1985

    Caldor, Inc. v. Heffernan, 183 Conn. 566, 571 , 440 A.2d 767 (1981); Connecticut Theater Foundation, Inc. v. Brown, 179 Conn. 672, 677 , 427 A.2d 863 (1980). … Jewett City Savings *918 Bank v. Board of Equalization, 116 Conn. 172, 185 , 164 A. 643 (1933).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Garcia v. Yonkers Board of Education

    188 F. Supp. 3d 353 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 27, 2016

    Board of Education of the Hastings-on-Hudson Union Free Sch. Dist., 411 F.3d 306, 312 (2d Cir.2005). … A plaintiff is required to file a notice of claim for any case seeking to enforce a private right against a School Board, a School District or its employees. Augustin v. Enlarged City Sch.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Baldwin Union Free School District

    603 F. Supp. 2d 509 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 20, 2009

    Plaintiff Alvis Brown (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action against Defendants Baldwin Union Free School District and Baldwin Union Free School District Board of Education (together, “Defendants”), asserting claims under Title … Aug. 25, 2008); Graham v. Ambridge Area Sch. Dist., No. 07-1640, 2008 WL 1994861 , at *2, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37261 , at *5 (W.D.Pa. May 5, 2008); Brown v. Unified Sch. Dist.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Cortes v. Board of Governors

    766 F. Supp. 623 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 5, 1991

    In Tull v. … See also Smith v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • H. Phillips Co. v. Brown-Forman Distillers Corp.

    483 F. Supp. 1289 · District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · Feb 6, 1980

    E&E Hauling, Inc. v. Forest Preserve District, 613 F.2d 675 (7th Cir. 1980), page 678. And we know, generally, that: “The severity of the impairment measures the height of the hurdle the state legislation must clear.” … Allied Structural Steel v. Spannaus, 438 U.S. 234, 245 , 98 S.Ct. 2716, 2723 , 57 L.Ed.2d 727 (1978). It can fairly be said that the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law has a sharp bite.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Erickson v. Social Security Board

    52 F. Supp. 424 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 6, 1943

    . § 405 (g), to review the final decision of the Social Security Board and to recover the sum of $40.50 claimed to be due to plaintiff under the act. … It seems that even under the Board’s definition of Section 209(f) the wages earned from January 1, 1939, should have been included in the computation.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sung v. DeJoy

    District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 5, 2024

    Rivera v. Heyman, 157 F.3d 101, 105 (2d Cir. 1998) (construing Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 428 U.S. 820 (1976)). … § 2617(a)(2) does not reach the federal government and 5 U.S.C. §§ 6381 et seq. create no private right of action for federal employees); Keen v. Brown, 958 F. Supp. 70, 75 (D. Conn. 1997) (same); Beauchat v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Cooley (In Re Cooley)

    72 B.R. 54 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Mar 5, 1987

    Brown filed an objection to the exemptions claiming that his valid lien on the debtor’s property prevented it being included in her estate for exemption purposes. … Brown, citing Huckabee v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Seippel v. Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, LLP

    399 F. Supp. 2d 283 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 16, 2005

    Weixel v. Board of Educ. of New York, 287 F.3d 138, 145 (2d Cir.2002) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957) (alterations omitted)). 8 . Phelps v. … Dec. 27, 2004) (quoting Dodds v. Cigna Sec. Inc., 12 F.3d 346 , 350 (2d Cir.1993)). 34 . Rothman v. Gregor, 220 F.3d 81, 96 (2d Cir.2000) (quoting Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 41-42 (2d Cir.1993)). 35 . Salinger v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Carroll v. Social Security Board

    44 F. Supp. 790 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 25, 1941

    United States v. Weitzel, 246 U.S. 533 , 38 S.Ct. 381 , 62 L.Ed. 872 . … The decision of the Social Security Board was correct and must be affirmed. An order accordingly will be entered June 25, 1941.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees v. Moroni

    905 F. Supp. 2d 846 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 25, 2012

    Plaintiff Board of Trustees of the Automobile Mechanics’ Local No. 701 Union and Industry Pension Fund (“The Fund”) received a default judgment on December 7, 2010 against Elmhurst Lincoln Mercury, Inc. … The case cites Chicago Title & Trust Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. Brown

    192 F. Supp. 2d 1376 · District Court, M.D. Georgia · Mar 22, 2002

    See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); Irby v. Bittick, 44 F.3d 949, 953 (11th Cir.1995). … See Cagle v. Bruner, 112 F.3d 1510, 1515 (11th Cir.1997).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States Steel Corp.

    698 F. Supp. 1375 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 10, 1988

    See Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 489 U.S. 24 , 25, 99 S.Ct. 295, 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978). … Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24, 25 , 99 S.Ct. 295, 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978). The employer must merely present evidence to justify-a judgment in its favor.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Trade v. Tucker

    221 F. 300 · District Court, W.D. New York · Nov 29, 1913

    In McDearmott Commission Co. v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 146 Fed. 961 , 77 C. C. A. 479 , 7 L. R. A. (N. S.) 889, 8 Ann. … Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, 201 Fed. 20 , 120 C. C.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

    909 F. Supp. 824 · District Court, D. Colorado · Dec 29, 1995

    Plaintiffs complaint further states that defendants Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation, R.J. … Bradbury v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Levi v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation

    851 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2012

    See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Firestone, 76 F.3d at 1211 (citations omitted); see Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 108 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cohen v. Chesterfield County School Board

    326 F. Supp. 1159 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · May 17, 1971

    Goesaert v. … Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183, 192 , 73 S.Ct. 215, 219 , 97 L.Ed. 216 (1952). See also Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967).

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Housing Authority of Calvert County

    150 F. Supp. 2d 856 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jul 20, 2001

    After Lundy’s departure, Parrish, vice chair of the Housing Authority Board, volunteered as executive director and instructed Brown to report to Herrmann, director of rental services. … Brown v. McLean, 159 F.3d 898, 905 (4th Cir.1998) (citations omitted).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Goss v. Board of Education

    270 F. Supp. 903 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 7, 1967

    An order was entered on that date by the Court directing the School Board to submit on or before April 8,1960 a plan to bring about a good faith compliance with the decision in Brown v. Board of Education, supra. … Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, Va., 345 F.2d 310 (C.A. 4); Wheeler v. Durham City Board of Education, 346 F.2d 768 (C.A. 4); Goss v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.