Case law

Quinn-Brown Pub. Corporation v. Chilton Co.

15 F. Supp. 213 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 6, 1936

There is also pleaded a resolution adopted by the board of directors of the Wire Association. … Fraser v. Yack, 116 F. 285 (C.C.A. 7); Saake v. Lederer, 174 F. 135 (C.C.A. 3); Public Ledger v. New York Times, supra.

Tomchek-May v. Brown County

581 F. Supp. 1163 · District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Mar 6, 1984

This center is governed by the Brown County Community Mental Health, Mental Retardation, Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Board, commonly known as the Unified Board. … In Usery v.

Trujillo v. Board of Education

230 F.R.D. 657 · District Court, D. New Mexico · Mar 31, 2005

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BROWNING, District Judge. … The Defendants’ counsel in this case also represents APS in Transito Trujillo v. Board of Education of the Albuquerque Public Schools, et. al, No. Civ. 02-1146, a case involving Trujillo’s husband.

Kramer v. Board of Education

419 F. Supp. 958 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 28, 1976

Monell v. Department of Social Services, 532 F.2d 259 (2d Cir. 1976). … Id.; Weise v. Syracuse University, 522 F.2d 397, 410-11 (2d Cir. 1975). This is equally so as it applies to claims for back pay as well as reinstatement. Hunter v.

United States Ex Rel. Smart v. Christus Health

626 F. Supp. 2d 647 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Jan 22, 2009

Recovery Servs. v. United States, 72 F.3d 447 , 450 (5th Cir.1995) (citing Cooper v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 19 F.3d 562 , 565 n. 4 (11th Cir.1994)). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1964-65, 1969 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (abrogating the Conley v.

Brown v. Bronx Cross County Medical Group

834 F. Supp. 105 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 14, 1993

In Butts v. … In Patterson v.

Pearson v. Board of Education

499 F. Supp. 2d 575 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 10, 2007

In this case, plaintiffs Ronald Pearson, John Holder, and Richard Williams, New York City public school teachers, allege that their employers, the Board of Education (now the Department of Education), the City of New York … Galabya v. N.Y.

Hawkins v. Franchise Tax Board

447 B.R. 291 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 22, 2011

See, e.g., United States v. Jacobs (In re Jacobs), 490 F.3d 913, 921 (11th Cir.2007); Stamper v. United States (In re Gardner), 360 F.3d 551, 558 (6th Cir.2004); Tudisco v. … See also Hamm v.

Karnstein v. Pewaukee School Board

557 F. Supp. 565 · District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Feb 28, 1983

In Board of Regents v. … Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886 , 81 S.Ct. 1743 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1230 (1961).

Grugan v. BBC Brown Boveri, Inc.

729 F. Supp. 1080 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 24, 1990

Co. v. … See, also, Bouton v.

Brown v. Youth Center at Topeka

883 F. Supp. 572 · District Court, D. Kansas · Apr 25, 1995

Mangels v. Pena, 789 F.2d 836, 838 (10th Cir.1986); Atencio v. Board of Education of Penasco Ind. Sch. Dist., 658 F.2d 774 , 779 (10th Cir.1981). … In Cleveland Board of Education v.

Ohio Ex Rel. Brown v. Usepa

460 F. Supp. 248 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 29, 1978

BROWN, Attorney General of Ohio, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al., Defendants. William Leslie EVANS et al., Plaintiffs, v. Russell E. … Sierra Club v. Froehlke, 486 F.2d 946, 953 (7th Cir. 1973); and see Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 , 91 S.Ct. 814 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971). City of Des Plaines v.

Heumann v. Board of Education

320 F. Supp. 623 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 7, 1970

Plaintiff is a physically handicapped person who in February 1970 was denied a license to teach in the New York City schools by the Board of Examiners (“the Board”) of the New York City Board of Education on the ground that … Gaddis v. Wyman, 304 F.Supp. 713, 717 (S.D.N.Y. 1969), affd. sub nom. Wyman v. Bowens, 397 U.S. 49 , 90 S.Ct. 813 , 25 L.Ed.2d 38 (1970); Kelly v. Wyman, 294 F.Supp. 887 (S.D.N.Y.1968), affd. sub nom. Goldberg v.

Brown v. American Home Products Corp.

520 F. Supp. 1120 · District Court, D. Kansas · Aug 28, 1981

Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544, 554-55 , 89 S.Ct. 817, 825-26 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 (1969). The Court instructed in Cannon : “. . . … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 300 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1717 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979); Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 , 89 S.Ct. 1794 , 23 L.Ed.2d 371 (1969); F.H.A. v.

Estate of Brown v. Arc Music Group

830 F. Supp. 2d 501 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 22, 2011

The late Joe Brown was a musician and founder of three Chicago record labels, the first in 1949. Brown died in 1976. … In Gaiman v.

Harris v. KELLOGG, BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC.

796 F. Supp. 2d 642 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 2011

Harris v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc., 618 F.Supp.2d 400, 434 (W.D.Pa.2009). … Harris v. Kellogg, Brown and Root Services, Inc., 796 F.Supp.2d 642 , 2011 WL 2462486 (W.D.Pa. Jun. 17, 2011).

Heartwood, Inc. v. United States Forest Service

431 F. Supp. 2d 28 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2006

Council v. … See, e.g., Nader v.

Jacobs Manufacturing Co. v. Sam Brown Co.

792 F. Supp. 1520 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 8, 1992

Co. v. Missouri State Highway Commission, 454 S.W.2d 44, 56 (Mo. banc 1970); Scullin Steel Co. v. PACCAR, Inc., 708 S.W.2d 756, 761 (Mo.App.1986). Jacobs argues that Brown’s future profit claim was based on Dr. … Thus, Jacobs is correct that by suing for damages for fraud, Brown has affirmed the contract. Brown’s argument to the contrary misconstrues the authority it cites. Brown relies primarily upon Western Fireproofing Co. v.

Brown v. Banana Distributors of Connecticut, Inc.

52 F. Supp. 804 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Sep 3, 1943

See opinion of Judge Healey in United States v. Armour & Co. of Delaware, D.C. Mass.1943, 50 F.Supp. 347 .

Brown v. Lasalle Northwest National Bank

820 F. Supp. 1078 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 26, 1993

In an order dated March 25, 1993 (Brown v. … However, as plaintiff recognizes, if the FTC regulation does not apply to Brown’s transaction, plaintiff has no RICO claim.