Case law

Bryant v. Weintraub, Genshlea, Hardy, Erich & Brown

844 F. Supp. 640 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 14, 1994

Hirsch v. Blue Cross, Blue Shield of Kansas City, 800 F.2d 1474, 1477 (9th Cir.1986). … In State ex rel Circus Circus Reno, Inc. v.

Cooksey v. Board of Education

17 F. Supp. 3d 772 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 19, 2014

Because “the doctrine of respondeat superior is unavailable under § 1983,” Co-oksey must present evidence “that the Board itself violated her civil rights.” Darchak v. … See Complaint, Cooksey v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago (No. 13 C 8619), N.D.Ill.Dec. 2, 2013 (ECF 1).

Harris v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc.

618 F. Supp. 2d 400 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2009

Plaintiffs distinguish the above cited decisions and rely on Lessin v. Kellogg Brown & Root, 2006 WL 3940556 (S.D.Tex.2006) and Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc., et al. … (Docket No. 117); Harris v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc., Civ. A. No. 08-563, 2009 WL 700162 (W.D.Pa. March 11, 2009). 20 .

Trujillo v. Board of Education

230 F.R.D. 657 · District Court, D. New Mexico · Mar 31, 2005

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BROWNING, District Judge. … The Defendants’ counsel in this case also represents APS in Transito Trujillo v. Board of Education of the Albuquerque Public Schools, et. al, No. Civ. 02-1146, a case involving Trujillo’s husband.

Brown v. Watt Car & Wheel Co.

91 F. Supp. 570 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 24, 1949

That plaintiff, Roy Brown, was a permanent employee of the defendant, The Watt Car and Wheel Company, from March 16, 1941 until December 9, 1942 when he was inducted into the service of the United States Army. 2.

Brown v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.

18 F.2d 677 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Feb 17, 1927

Dec. 732 ]; Day v. Essex County Bank, 13 Vt. 97 ; Moulin v. Trenton Ins. Co., 1 Dutch. (25 N. J. Law) 57; Bushel v. Commonwealth Ins. Co., 15 Serg. & R. [Pa.] 173; North Missouri Railroad v. … Railroad Co. v. Harris, above cited; Dennick v. Railroad Co., 103 U. S. 11 [ 26 L. Ed. 439 ]; Huntington v. Attrill, 146 U. S. 657, 670, 675 [ 13 S. Ct. 224 , 36 L. Ed. 1123 ] ; Stewart v.

Kramer v. Board of Education

419 F. Supp. 958 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 28, 1976

Monell v. Department of Social Services, 532 F.2d 259 (2d Cir. 1976). … Id.; Weise v. Syracuse University, 522 F.2d 397, 410-11 (2d Cir. 1975). This is equally so as it applies to claims for back pay as well as reinstatement. Hunter v.

Bustillos v. Board of County Commissioners

310 F.R.D. 631 · District Court, D. New Mexico · Sep 16, 2016

BROWNING, District Judge. … See Lymon v. Aramark Corp., 2009 WL 5220285 , at *5 n. 3 (Browning, J.)

M&T Bank v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 12, 2022

BROWN, et al., Defendants. … See, e.g., Berezovsky v.

Brown v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

342 F. Supp. 3d 1234 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Oct 19, 2018

Co. v. Brown , 832 So.2d 1 , 12 (Ala. 2001) ; Twin City Fire Ins. Co. v. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co. , 817 So.2d 687 , 697 (Ala. 2001) ). The Court then found that Mr. Brown had met his prima facie burden because "Mr. … Co. v.

United States v. Pete Brown Enterprises, Inc.

328 F. Supp. 600 · District Court, N.D. Mississippi · Jun 28, 1971

As stated in United States v. … United States v. Alex Dussel Iron Works, 31 F.2d 535 (5 Cir. 1929).

Gulino v. Board of Education

113 F. Supp. 3d 663 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 5, 2015

Educators v. … Kaufman v.

Mapp v. Board of Education

329 F. Supp. 1374 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 26, 1971

Pursuant to the decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), this lawsuit was instituted. … The City of Chattanooga can never expect to remain an island within the Nation living in the pre-Brown v. Board of Education era, when the rest of the Nation is moving into the post-Brown v. Board of Education era.

Mannings v. School Board

149 F.R.D. 237 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Jun 16, 1993

See Bradley v. Pinellas County School Bd., 961 F.2d 1554 (11th Cir.1992) and Adams v. Baldwin County Bd. of Ed., 628 F.2d 895 (5th Cir.1980). … Id. at 1556 , citing Hines v. Rapides Parish School Board, 479 F.2d 762 (5th Cir.1973) [Emphasis added]. Accordingly it is ORDERED that the Intervenors Motion for Evidentiary Hearing is hereby GRANTED.

Brown v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

358 F. Supp. 3d 1265 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Jul 25, 2018

Brown relies on Allen v. Turpin . (Doc. 55 at 4) (citing Allen v. Turpin , 533 So.2d 515 , 517 (Ala. 1988) ). … Co. v. Brown , 832 So.2d 1 , 12 (Ala. 2001) (citing Fleming v. Ala. Farm Bureau Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. [ 293 Ala. 719 ], 310 So.2d 200 , 202 (Ala. 1975) ).

Brown v. A. Mora Star 135

494 F. Supp. 2d 914 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 13, 2007

I must view the allegations in the light most favorable to Brown. Gomez v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ., 811 F.2d 1030, 1039 (7th Cir.1987). … However, Brown’s complaint satisfies the requirements of federal notice pleading by putting the defendants on notice of her claims. See Doe v.

Bolanowski v. Raich

330 F. Supp. 724 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Jul 9, 1971

See, e. g., Lester v. Board of Elections, 319 F.Supp. 505 (D.D.C.1970) (three-judge court). While opinions are by no means unanimous, compare, e. g., Fitzpatrick v. … Board of Election Commissioners, 39 U.S.L.Week, 2356 (N.D.Ill. December 21, 1970, three-judge court), and Spillers v.

Globe Glass & Mirror Co. v. Brown

888 F. Supp. 768 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jun 19, 1995

See Hicks v. … McNamara, 577 So.2d 187, 189-90 (La.App. 1st Cir.1991) (board of tax appeals does not have authority to decide constitutionality of a statute). 8 .

Hemmerich Industries, Inc. v. Moss Brown & Co.

114 F.R.D. 31 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1987

Service was attempted by certified mail addressed to Moss Brown & Co., Inc. at the defendant’s place of business in Alexandria, Virginia. … Zeigler v.

Brown v. McKinnon Bridge Co., Inc.

732 F. Supp. 1479 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 6, 1989

Brown.] … The claimant must have been on board primarily to aid in navigation. 649 F.2d at 443 . See also Searcy v. E.T. Slider, Inc., 679 F.2d 614 (6th Cir.1982).