Case law

Brown v. BAKER HUGHES INC.

433 F. Supp. 2d 1094 · District Court, E.D. California · May 17, 2006

See Malhiot v. S. Cal. Retail Clerks Union, 735 F.2d 1133, 1135 (9th Cir.1984); Ellenburg v. … Plaintiff also cited Allen v.

United States ex rel. Brown v. Lane

196 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Jul 26, 1961

Brown v. State, 1961, 171 N.E.2d 825 . On March 27, 1961, the petitioner filed a petition for Writ of Certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States. This Writ was denied on June 12, 1961, 81 S.Ct. 1906 . … The decisions of the Indiana Supreme Court upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by this petitioner in Brown v. State, 1961, supra, and in the recent case of McCrary v.

Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security

430 F. Supp. 2d 102 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 15, 2005

INTRODUCTION This is an action brought by plaintiff Katrina Brown, pro se, on behalf of her minor son, Kirk D. … The Commissioner employs a three-step sequential analysis to determine whether a child is disabled within the meaning of the Act. 20 C.F.R. § 416.924 (a); see also Pollard v.

First Nat. Bank v. Rogers, Brown & Co.

299 F. 602 · District Court, W.D. Washington · May 17, 1924

The Supreme Court of Washington, in Buck v. Equitable Life Ins. … Davis v. Alexander (Okl. Sup.) 220 Pac. 358 .

Brown v. Wheat First Securities, Inc.

101 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 13, 2000

Brown, a former employee of defendant Wheat First Securities, Inc., is suing Wheat First, First Union Corp., and several individuals employed by Wheat First for conspiracy in violation of Section 2 of the Civil Rights Act … The Act establishes “a federal policy favoring arbitration,” Shearson/American Express v. McMahon, 482 U.S. 220, 226 , 107 S.Ct. 2332 , 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987) (citing Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v.

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States

369 F. Supp. 1283 · District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Mar 9, 1973

In Central Citrus Company v. … In Central Citrus Company v.

Burger v. Social Security Board

66 F. Supp. 619 · District Court, S.D. California · May 15, 1946

North Whittier Heights Citrus Ass’n v. National Labor Relations Board, 9 Cir., 1940, 109 F.2d 76 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Tovrea Packing Co., 9 Cir., 1940, 111 F.2d 626 ; Idaho Potato Growers v. … The Board’s decisions interpreting the Act and regulations are entitled to great weight United States v. Lalone, 9 Cir., 1945, 152 F.2d 43 ; Walker v. Altmeyer, 2 Cir., 1943, 137 F.2d 531 ; Social Security Board v.

Allison v. Mennonite Publications Board

123 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 19, 1954

Gray v. Blight, 10 Cir., 112 F.2d 696 ; 21 C.J.S., Courts, § 545; Griffin v. McCoach, 313 U.S. 498 , 61 S.Ct. 1023 , 85 L.Ed. 1481 ; Hughes v. Lucker, 3 Cir., 174 F.2d 285 ; Hartwell v. … Y.M.C.A. of Germantown v. City of Philadelphia, supra; First Baptist Church v.

Edwards v. MURPHY-BROWN, LLC

802 F. Supp. 2d 670 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jul 14, 2011

Edwards v. Murphy- *672 Brown, L.L.C., 760 F.Supp.2d 607, 610-13 (E.D.Va.2011). … Co. v.

United States Ex Rel. Brown v. Smith

200 F. Supp. 885 · District Court, D. Vermont · Jan 12, 1962

V-C-6. 299 . Pet. Ex. V-B. Brown v. … Justice Black in Brown v.

Quinn v. Board of Education

234 F. Supp. 3d 922 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 13, 2017

Id. at 109 , 87 S.Ct. 1549 ; Cohanim v. … Plaintiffs cite Frank v. Walker, 768 F.3d 744 (7th Cir. 2014), and Frank v.

Direct Mail Specialist, Inc. v. Brown

673 F. Supp. 1540 · District Court, D. Montana · Dec 2, 1987

Partnership § 40 (1950), 60 Am.Jur.2d Partnership § 376 (1972), Bisno v. Hyde, 290 F.2d 560 (9th Cir.1961), Hoefer v. Hall, 75 N.M. 751 , 411 P.2d 230 (1966). … In the case of Vidricksen v.

Brown v. United States

927 F. Supp. 1176 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Sep 8, 1995

Simply put, in Feres v. … v.

Brown v. R.R. Grp. Ltd. Liab. Co.

350 F. Supp. 3d 300 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 2, 2018

Ronald Brown and Mr. Jesse Brown felt it was directed towards them as they felt it was meant towards people of color. Mr. … Brown v. J. Kaz, Inc. , 581 F.3d 175 , 181-82 (3d Cir. 2009).

Brown v. United States

290 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 2, 1968

“THE CLERK: Does defendant Tommie Louis Lee Brown waive reading of the Indictment ? “DEFENDANT BROWN: Yes, I will. … Harris v. United States, 338 F.2d 75,80 (9th Cir. 1964). PETITIONER’S SECOND CONTENTION That there was an abridgment of the constitutional rights set forth in Machibroda v. United States.

Brown v. First National City Bank

365 F. Supp. 1286 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 7, 1973

Rosenspan v. First National City Bank, 72 Civ. 4515 (S.D.N.Y., filed Aug. 23, 1973). … In addition, the state claims stem from a “common nucleus of operative fact”, United Mine Workers v.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Triple-S Vida, Inc.

District Court, D. Puerto Rico · Feb 17, 2023

See Meléndez-Fernández, 2012 WL 4813528 at 3; Torres– Negrón v. Merck & Co., Inc., 488 F.3d 34 (1st Cir. 2007) (relying on NLRB v. Browning–Ferris Indus., Inc., 691 F.2d 1114, 1122 (3d Cir. 1982)). … P. 12(f); Alvarado– Morales v. Digital Equip. Corp., 843 F.2d 613, 618 (1st Cir. 1988); and Boreri v.

United States v. Alex. Brown & Sons, Inc.

169 F.R.D. 532 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 26, 1996

Bottaro v. … See United States v.

Stechler v. Sidley, Austin Brown & Wood, L.L.P.

382 F. Supp. 2d 580 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 5, 2005

This Court alone is currently proceeding with Seippel v. Sidley, Austin Brown & Wood, 93 in which Brown & Wood is a party, and Denney and Blythe v. … Board of Educ. of New York, 287 F.3d 138, 145 (2d Cir.2002) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957) (alterations omitted)). 55 . Phelps v.

Rosee v. Board of Trade

36 F.R.D. 684 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 16, 1965

This is an action by plaintiff, Bernhard Rosee, alleging . that defendants, the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago and various individuals, conspired wrongfully to deprive him of his membership in the Board of Trade; to … This facet of the case is fully discussed in the court’s opinion, Rosee v. Board of Trade, D.C., 35 F.R.D. 512 (1964).