Case law

Miller v. Smith

431 F. Supp. 821 · District Court, N.D. Texas · May 11, 1977

As the opinion in Monroe v. … See, for example, Ortiz v. LaVallee, 442 F.2d 912 (2nd Cir., 1971) and Ney v. State of California, 439 F.2d 1285 (9th Cir., 1971). 16 . Knowles v. Carson, 419 F.2d 369, 371 (5th Cir., 1969). 17 . Jones v.

Brown v. Cameron-Brown Co.

92 F.R.D. 32 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Oct 16, 1981

Brown v. Cameron-Brown Co., CA No. 78-0836-A-R at 17 (E.D.Va., 13 June 1980) (memorandum) and there is support from other courts that plaintiffs’ counsel are competent. See e. g., Sommers v. Abraham Lincoln Fed. S. & L. … Brown v. Cameron-Brown, supra, at 17. Presumably, then, plaintiffs can be expected to rely heavily on their attorneys, and the award of attorneys’ fees supports the important role that attorneys play in such cases.

Board of County Commissioners v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.

768 F. Supp. 2d 1092 · District Court, D. Colorado · Mar 3, 2011

Issues relating to the contamination have been discussed at board meetings open to the public, and La Plata has talked to adjacent landowners. … (R & M) v.

Adams v. Department of Mental Health of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 27, 2011

District of Columbia, 980 A.2d 1217, 1223 (D.C. 2009) (explaining that “[t]he jurisdiction of the court and OHR are mutually exclusive in the first instance” (quoting Brown v. … Id. at 860 (quoting Brown v. Capitol Hill Club, 425 A.2d 1309, 1312 (1981)).

King v. United States

162 F. Supp. 2d 750 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 18, 2001

Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville, 99 F.3d 194, 197 (6th Cir.1996); Board of Trustees of Painesville Tp. v. City of Painesville, 200 F.3d 396, 398 (6th Cir.1999). … In Brown v.

Government of the Virgin Islands v. Lansdale

172 F. Supp. 2d 636 · District Court, Virgin Islands · Jul 30, 2001

See Arizona v. … See RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF JUDGMENTS § 25 (1971) (claim preclusion applies even when new grounds or theories or evidence is presented or new remedies or forms of relief are sought); Brown v.

Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. v. Francois

832 F. Supp. 2d 1364 · District Court, N.D. Florida · May 27, 2011

A physician who violates the Florida referral statute is subject to disciplinary action by the medical board. § 456.053(5)(f), Fla. Stat. … Browning, 522 F.3d 1153, 1167 (11th Cir.2008). *1367 Sometimes, a federal law contains an express statement that it is displacing state law, making the federal law the sole governing standard. Id.

Board of County Commissioners v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.

598 F. Supp. 2d 1185 · District Court, D. Colorado · Feb 18, 2009

Roby v. … .”); Antolovich v. Brown Group Retail, Inc., 183 P.3d 582, 594 (Colo.Ct.App.2007). C.

Great Lakes Higher Education Corp. v. Cavazos

698 F. Supp. 1464 · District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · Nov 1, 1988

Tele-Controls, Inc. v. Ford Industries, 388 F.2d 48, 50 (7th Cir.1967), cited in Jordi v. Sauk Prairie School Board, 651 F.Supp. 1566, 1581 (W.D.Wis.1987); Nuclear-Chicago Corporation v. … American Dairy Queen Corporation v. Brown-Port Company, 621 F.2d 255 , 259 n. 4 (7th Cir.1980). 3.

Cook v. Brown

364 F. Supp. 3d 1184 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 28, 2019

Council

District Court, N.D. Texas · Jan 14, 2026

Yumilicious Franchise, L.L.C. v. Barrie, 819 F.3d 170, 176 (5th Cir. 2016) (citing Fulton v. Hecht, 580 F.2d 1243, 1248 n.2 (5th Cir. 1978)); see also Arruda v. Curves Int’l, Inc., 861 F. … No. 5 at 6 (quoting Rich v. Palko, 920 F.3d 288, 293- 94 (5th Cir. 2019) (cleaned up; quoting Brown v. Miller, 519 F.3d 231, 236 (5th Cir. 2008))).)

Thornton v. Wormuth

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2025

Cir. 1995) (explaining “that when a Board reviews the merits of a former servicemember’s application under § 1552(a)(1), the decision is subject to judicial review” (citing Chappell v. … The scope of review is narrow, as this Court “review[s] a decision of a military corrections board under an ‘unusually deferential application of the “arbitrary and capricious” standard.’” Roberts v.

Devnew v. Brown & Brown, Inc.

396 F. Supp. 2d 665 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Oct 17, 2005

Devnew filed a civil action against his former employer Brown & Brown, Inc. alleging that the termination of his employment breached his employment agreement and violated the public policy of the Commonwealth of Virginia. … From July 1994 until on or around April 21, 2005, he was employed by Defendant Brown & Brown, Inc. (“B & B”). B & B is a Florida corporation that maintains its principal place of business in Daytona Beach.

Industrial Development Board of Prattville v. Brown & Root, Inc.

99 F.R.D. 58 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 12, 1983

Defendant Brown and Root, Inc., was the general contractor that installed the machine at the mill. … See, Ketona Chemical Corp. v. Globe Indemnity Co., 404 F.2d 181 (5th Cir.1968). See, also, Sanders v. Liberty Mutual Ins.

Markel v. Del Toro

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2025

citing Chappell v. … The scope ofreview is narrow, as this Court "review[s] a decision ofa military corrections board under an 'unusually deferential application of the "arbitrary and capricious" standard."' Roberts v.

United States v. Montana

437 F. Supp. 354 · District Court, D. Montana · Aug 19, 1977

State Board of Equalization, 161 Mont. 140 , 505 P.2d 102 (1973), (Kiewit). … See, e. g., Phillips Co. v. Dumas School District, [supra]; United States v. City of Detroit, [supra]; City of Detroit v. Murray Corp., 355 U.S. 489 , [ 78 S.Ct. 458 , 2 L.Ed.2d 441 .]” Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v.

Hammaker v. Brown & Brown, Inc.

214 F. Supp. 2d 575 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jul 22, 2002

This matter is before the Court upon defendant Brown & Brown, Inc.’s Motion to Strike Jury Demand. … In its reply brief, Brown notes that the Fourth Circuit cites to Williams for authority in Zandford v. Prudential-Bache Sec., Inc., 112 F.3d 723 (1997).

Kikifer’s Entrepreneurial Academy, Keishonda Williamson, and Henry McDavid v. Winnebago County Community Health Board, Region 1 Planning Council, Winnebago County, Illinois, and Winnebago County Community Health Board Members

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 3, 2026

Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 756 (1984) (observing that race discrimination is “not only judicially cognizable” but also “one of the most serious injuries recognized in our legal system,” citing Brown v. … Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)). But, again, plaintiffs asserting stigmatic harms must still show that the discrimination affected them on a personal level, Satanic Temple, Inc. v.

Petion

District Court, D. Connecticut · Jun 9, 2026

Robinson v. Concentra Health Servs., 781 F.3d 42, 44 (2d Cir. 2015) (Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co., 654 F.3d 347, 358 (2d Cir.2011)) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Goode v.

John Paul Mitchell Systems v. Quality King Distributors, Inc.

106 F. Supp. 2d 462 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 8, 2000

See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 67 (2d Cir.1983); United States v. Holmquist, 36 F.3d 154, 167 (1st Cir.1994); Denison v. … United States v. Brown, 688 F.2d 1112, 1116 (7th Cir.1982). The U.S.