Case law

Gore v. Kressner (In Re Kressner)

206 B.R. 303 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Feb 12, 1997

Vernon Board of Education; and the sum of $688.33 with interest from November 9, 1992 regarding a matter entitled Kerr v. Matteo. … Id. at 284-85 n. 11, 111 S.Ct. at 658 -59 n. 11; Kelly v. Robinson, 479 U.S. 36 , 48 n. 8, 107 S.Ct. 353 , 360 n. 8, 93 L.Ed.2d 216 (1986); Brown v.

In Re Burgos

294 B.R. 210 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · Jun 19, 2003

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve v. MCorp Financial, Inc. (In re MCorp), 502 U.S. 32, 33 , 112 S.Ct. 459 , 116 L.Ed.2d 358 (1991). … Apart from the fact that this is not a court of appeals for state court proceedings, see Kropelnicki v.

In Re Ginn

186 B.R. 898 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · Oct 2, 1995

Id.; Arbesman v. … Anderson v. Anderson, 215 Md. 483, 489 , 138 A.2d 880, 884 (1957). See also State v. One 1984 Toyota Truck, 311 Md. 171, 188 , 533 A.2d 659, 667 (1987); Rue v. Haines, 229 Md. 268, 272 , 182 A.2d 872 (1961); Brell v.

Hoyt v. Hoyt (In Re Hoyt)

97 B.R. 730 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · Mar 23, 1989

Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 131 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2209 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). See also Corey v. … N.L.R.B. v.

Sticka v. Anderson (In Re Anderson)

165 B.R. 482 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · Mar 21, 1994

Wilson v. Huffman, 712 F.2d at 210 . When the transferee is a per se insider, the court does not need to examine the actual nature of the relationship. In Zakroff v. … In Browning Interests v. Allison (In re Holloway), 955 F.2d 1008 (5th Cir.1992), certain creditors moved to set aside the debtor’s transfer of a security interest to the debtor’s *487 former wife.

In Re Pleasant View Utility District of Cheatham County

24 B.R. 632 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 14, 1982

United States v. Bekins, 304 U.S. at 49, 58 S.Ct. at 814. See also Faitoute Iron & Steel Co. v. … See Buchholz v. South Beardstown Drainage & Levee District, 125 F.2d 13, 14-15 (7th Cir.1941); Roberts v. Board of Public Instruction, 112 F.2d 459 , 461 — 162 (5th Cir.1940); Vailette v.

In Re DeBaggis

247 B.R. 383 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 1, 1999

Ramos v. Browning Ferris Indus. of S. Jersey, Inc., 103 N.J. 177, 191 , 510 A.2d 1152, 1159 (1986). In the seminal case of Adler's Quality Bakery, Inc. v. … Ramos v. Browning Ferris Indus. of S. Jersey, Inc., 103 N.J. at 190 , 510 A.2d at 1158-59 . (citations omitted).

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. McCraney (In Re McCraney)

63 B.R. 64 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · Jul 11, 1986

Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). Less clear is whether federal law or state law determines the underlying issues of a dis-chargeability issue under Section 523(a)(4). … Carey Lumber Co. v.

Grayson O Company

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 31, 2023

Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77, 92–93 (2010). … at 51 (citing Brown v. Wells Fargo, N/A, 463 B.R. 332, 338 (M.D.N.C. 2011)).

Leonard v. Coolidge (In Re National Audit Defense Network)

367 B.R. 207 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · Apr 24, 2007

v. … See Cunningham v. Brown, 265 U.S. 1, 7-9 , 44 S.Ct. 424 , 68 L.Ed. 873 (1924), which discusses how Mr. Ponzi structured his scheme, and how it collapsed.

Berman v. Berman (In Re Berman)

125 B.R. 74 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · Mar 25, 1991

See In re Singleton, 37 B.R. 787 (Bankr.Nev.1984); Dey v. Dey, 31 B.R. 567 (Bankr.W.D.N.Y.1983); *77 In re Penning, 22 B.R. 616 (Bankr.E.D.Mich.1982). … Rich Co. v. United States ex rel. Industrial Lumber Co., 417 U.S. 116 , 94 S.Ct. 2157 , 40 L.Ed.2d 703 (1974); Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078 (2d Cir.1977).

Sherwin Williams Co. v. Grasso (In re Grasso)

497 B.R. 434 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 3, 2013

Field v. … Conte v.

D. Federico Co. v. New Bedford Redevelopment Authority (In Re D. Federico Co.)

8 B.R. 888 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 3, 1981

Shalloo, Inc. v. … Both progress reports were unanimously accepted by the Board.

Munford, Inc. v. TOC Retail, Inc. (In Re Munford, Inc.)

115 B.R. 390 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · Jun 13, 1990

—In anticipation of the eventual merger of the companies, Munford’s Board of Directors (composed of the same people as TOC’s board) approved TOC’s adoption of Munford’s Profit Sharing Plan and designated TOC officially as … Inc. v. Gerstel, 232 F.2d 294 (5th Cir.1956).

Taburaza v. Zarate (In re Zarate)

567 B.R. 176 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · Feb 2, 2017

Stout v. … While plaintiffs cite Bos v. Board of Trustees, 818 F.3d 486, 489 (9th Cir. 2016) as supporting their argument, in fact it does no such thing.

United States v. Cole (In re Cole)

20 B.R. 170 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · May 24, 1982

Spilman v. Harley, supra, at 226. … Spilman v. Harley, supra, at 227. The application of collateral estoppel was stated to be logically consistent with the decision in Brown v.

Bucchino v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Bucchino)

439 B.R. 761 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · Sep 29, 2010

See Board of County Commissioners of Sweetwater County v. … Owen, 500 U.S. 305, 308 , 111 S.Ct. 1833 , 114 L.Ed.2d 350 (1991)); Gamble v. Brown (In re Gamble), 168 F.3d 442, 443 (11th Cir. 1999) (“exempt property is not part of the bankruptcy estate”).

In Re Image Innovations Holdings, Inc.

391 B.R. 255 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jul 23, 2008

See Grausz v. Englander, 321 F.3d 467 (4th Cir.2003) (legal malpractice); Iannochino v. Rodolakis (In re Iannochino), 242 F.3d 36 (1st Cir.2001) (legal malpractice); Osherow v. … In re Layo, 460 F.3d at 292 , citing Corbett, 124 F.3d at 87; see also Browning v.

Congress Financial Corp. v. Airwalk International, LLC (In Re Airwalk International, LLC)

305 B.R. 34 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · Dec 11, 2003

That Sunrise maintained a presence on the Airwalk board of directors. 5. … The Court finds nothing in Sunrise’s presence on Airwalk’s board of directors and its loans to Airwalk that rises to the level of inequitable conduct toward the objecting creditors.

Stahl v. Gross (In Re Gross)

288 B.R. 655 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · Feb 6, 2003

Kawaauhau v. Geiger, 523 U.S. 57, 61 , 118 S.Ct. 974 , 140 L.Ed.2d 90 (1998). … Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279 , 285 n. 11, 111 S.Ct. 654 , 112 L.Ed.2d 755 (1991); Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 139 n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979).