Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFB

10,000+ results

2.13s

  • Ganas v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Ganas)

    513 B.R. 394 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · Jul 11, 2014

    Deutsche Bank; 9 Padayachi v. Indymac Bank; 10 Sipe v. Countrywide Bank? 11 Pontiflet-Moore v. GMAC Mortgage; 12 and Rosal v. … See Piper v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Matter of Williston Oil Corp.

    54 B.R. 10 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 26, 1984

    Penn Terra Ltd. v. Department of Environmental Resources, 733 F.2d 267, 274 (3d Cir.1984). See also Donovan v. LaPorta (In re LaPorta), 26 B.R. 687 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1982) (enforcement of labor law); Donovan v. … Renegotiation Board v. Banner *13 craft Clothing Co., 415 U.S. 1, 24 , 94 S.Ct. 1028, 1040 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Keeling v. Ozey (In Re Ozey)

    172 B.R. 83 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 8, 1994

    Louis, Missouri, certifying that it owned the ERSAN V and that Margaret, its presidént and chairman of the board, was a U.S. citizen and owned at least 75% of Ersan Resources’ stock. … Terry v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Maneval v. Davis (In Re Davis)

    155 B.R. 123 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · May 26, 1993

    Maneval and Elizabeth V. … Taylor v. Sanders (In re Sanders), 105 B.R. 111 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1989); Lisk v. Criswell (In re Criswell), 52 B.R. 184, 203 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1985); Metropolitan Hospital v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In Re Metro Transportation Co.

    78 B.R. 416 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1987

    See Blum v. Witco Chemical Corp., 829 F.2d 367, 377-78 , (3d Cir.1987); and In re Pettibone Corp., 74 B.R. 293, 300-01 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1987). … Brown Co., 75 B.R. 539, 539-40 (E.D.Pa.1987); and Pettibone, supra, 74 B.R. at 299-300 (In the latter case the court cut over half of fee requested despite absence of objections to application.). 2 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • In Re Adventist Living Centers, Inc.

    137 B.R. 701 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 18, 1991

    Snyder who advised that Board had approved our retention, discussed steps to be taken, both in immediate future and down the road. Conferred with Mr. Smith and Mr. … Brown (Mercy Hospital) re health care claims; phone conference with M. Goldenhirsch re D. Cook claim; confer with K.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Stinson v. Bb & T Investment Services, Inc. (In Re Stinson)

    285 B.R. 239 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · Apr 26, 2002

    See also Comeaux v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 915 F.2d 1264 (9th Cir.1990). 10 *246 On the surface, the Leary court’s construction of the statute closely serves the purpose for which § 525 was enacted. … For example, in McLellan v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re McLean Industries, Inc.

    84 B.R. 340 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Mar 24, 1988

    Lowery v. … In Layne & Bowler Corp. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Sloan v. Allen (In re Allen)

    572 B.R. 440 · United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia · Sep 21, 2017

    See IBA, Inc. v. Hoyt (In re Hoyt), 326 B.R. 13, 20 (Bankr. … Joint Venture v. Cacioli (In re Cacioli), 463 F.3d 229, 235 (2d Cir. 2006) (citing White v. Schoenfeld, 117 F.2d 131, 132 (2d Cir. 1941)).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Simmons (In Re Simmons)

    9 B.R. 62 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · Jan 26, 1981

    To the extent that Tinker v. … See also Board of Public Instruction of Palm Beach Co., Fla. v. Cohen, 5 Cir. 1969, 413 F.2d 1201, 1203 . In Federal Electric Corp. v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Cohen v. Bucci (In Re Bucci)

    97 B.R. 954 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 24, 1989

    See generally Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 138-39 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2212-13 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); Combs v. Richardson, 838 F.2d 112, 114 (4th Cir.1988); and In re Halpern, 810 F.2d 1061, 1064 (11th Cir.1987). … . *957 Our circuit in Klingman v. Levinson, 831 F.2d 1292 (7th Cir.1987), set forth four requirements for invocation of collateral estoppel.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hoffman v. Educational Credit Management Corp. (In re Hoffman)

    557 B.R. 177 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · Sep 7, 2016

    The tuition and fee schedule also contains amounts for room and board. As Debtor asserts he lived off campus, he does not include these amounts in his college attendance costs. … In Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Vermont Stove Co.

    69 B.R. 87 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · Jan 12, 1987

    Joint Industry Board v. United States, 391 U.S. 224, 228 , 88 S.Ct. 1491, 1493 , 20 L.Ed.2d 546 (1968); Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. McFarlin’s, Inc., 789 F.2d 98, 100 (2nd Cir.1986). … Andrus v. Glover Construction Co., 446 US 608 , 64 L.Ed.2d 548 , 100 S.Ct. 1905 (1980). In re Burke Mountain Recreation, Inc. (Burke Mountain Recreation, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Stinson

    59 B.R. 914 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · Apr 24, 1986

    See, Wyoming County Bank v. Don B. Iwanicki as Trustee of Daniel Weber, Bankrupt, AP 245 (In re Daniel Weber, B 78-02611 C, Bankr.W.D.N.Y., filed June 30, 1980.) … Any repayment to the members customarily is contingent on the profitability of the cooperative and the action of its board of directors in declaring what is, in effect, a dividend.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Najarian Capital, LLC v. Cunningham (In re Cunningham)

    600 B.R. 898 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · May 7, 2019

    The second case Movant cites is Browning v. Navarro , 743 F.2d 1069 (5th Cir. 1984). … McCandless , 50 F.3d 217 (3d Cir. 1995) (citation omitted); see also Shapiro v. Logistec USA, Inc., 412 F.3d 307 (2d Cir. 2005) ; Agostini v. Piper Aircraft Corp. , 729 F.3d 350 (3d Cir. 2013) ; accord Vogel v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opportunity Bank, N.A. v. Martinsen (In Re Martinsen)

    449 B.R. 917 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · May 10, 2011

    Id. at 861 (quoting Cada v. … Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Martino v. Edison Worldwide Capital (In Re Randy)

    189 B.R. 425 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 8, 1995

    See Cunningham v. Brown, 265 U.S. at 8 , 44 S.Ct. at 425 (Ponzi scheme debtor was always insolvent and became more so each day the business succeeded); Guy v. … See Cunningham v. Brown, 265 U.S. 1 , 44 S.Ct. 424 , 68 L.Ed. 873 (1924); Boyle v. Gray, 28 F.2d 7 (1st Cir.1928), ce rt. denied, 278 U.S. 653 , 49 S.Ct. 178 , 73 L.Ed. 563 (1929); United States v.

    Disagreed with by Ronalee Levy Orlick v. John W. Kozyak, 309 F.3d 1325 (2002)Cited 80 timesPublished
  • Gibbs v. Housing Authority of New Haven (In Re Gibbs)

    12 B.R. 737 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · Jun 29, 1981

    Thiboutot and Maher v. … Brown v. Bathke, 588 F.2d 634, 638 (8th Cir. 1978).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Kismet Acquisition, LLC v. Icenhower (In Re Icenhower)

    406 B.R. 42 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · Mar 10, 2009

    Valdez reviewed Brady v. Brown and concluded by way of an email sent to Mr. Gaston and Mr. Diaz, copied to Mr. Martin and Mr. … Gaston reviewed Brady v. Brown and reported to Ms. Barba de la Torre in an email, copied to Mr. Hernandez and Ms. Valdez: This case [Brady v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re LaRosa Greenhouse, LLP

    565 B.R. 304 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 13, 2017

    D.S.D. 1992); In re Brown, 354 B.R. 535, 539 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2006)); see also In re Thorpe, 563 B.R. 576, 597-98 (Bankr. E.D. … In re Brown, 371 B.R. 486, 499 (Bankr. N.D. Okla.), amended, 371 B.R. 505 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2007). .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.