Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,439 results
1.89s
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · May 4, 2022
The Code also defines “assisted person” as “any person whose debts consist primarily of consumer debts and the value of whose nonexempt property is less than $204,425.4 Youngblood qualifies as a debt relief agency for … While the UST has established a clear and consistent pattern of violations on Youngblood’s part, the Court finds a civil penalty unnecessary as a deterrent.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Nov 13, 2019
The ballots distributed to holders of Claims entitled to vote on the Amended Plan clearly informed holders of Claims entitled to vote of the steps required to take if they disagreed with the scope or the grant of the releases … the Court notes that, while the Debtors propose to exculpate the Released Parties whose contributions and concessions have made the Amended Plan possible, Section 9.4 explicitly provides that no Released Party will be immune
Cited 0 timesUnknownFirst Bank Puerto Rico Inc. v. Foti (In re International Home Products Inc.)
491 B.R. 607 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · Apr 30, 2013
Foti qualifying for the protection of the automatic stay under either category of exception;” (iii) Mr. … Foti’s allegations are insufficient to establish “unusual circumstances” which consist of establishing that Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · Apr 28, 2022
D.N.H. 1991) (IRA did not qualify as pension or similar plan under ERISA and was thus not exempt under the Bankruptcy Code); Riendeau v. Canney (In re Riendeau), 293 B.R. 832 (D. 6 In order for Conn. Gen. … What other states have done in these contexts has no bearing on the facts here where the Connecticut Supreme Court has spoken clearly on the scope of protection afforded by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-361a.
Cited 0 timesUnknownOGGUSA, Inc. v. Louisville Dryer Company
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · Mar 31, 2022
The appropriate reinforced footings sufficient to support such massive pieces of equipment, which required planning by a qualified civil engineer, were not yet constructed at the Mayfield Facility. … But the evidence does not clearly describe the extent of progress on the final dryer and cooler to allow allocation of the amounts paid.
Cited 0 timesUnknownChad Neil Moxley and Toni Lynn Moxley
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · May 4, 2022
The Code also defines “assisted person” as “any person whose debts consist primarily of consumer debts and the value of whose nonexempt property is less than $204,425.5 Youngblood qualifies as a debt relief agency for … While the UST has established a clear and consistent pattern of violations on Youngblood’s part, the Court finds a civil penalty unnecessary as a deterrent.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCameron Ward and Melissa Heath
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · May 4, 2022
The Code also defines “assisted person” as “any person whose debts consist primarily of consumer debts and the value of whose nonexempt property is less than $204,425.5 Youngblood qualifies as a debt relief agency for … While the UST has established a clear and consistent pattern of violations on Youngblood’s part, the Court finds a civil penalty unnecessary as a deterrent.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · May 4, 2022
The Code also defines “assisted person” as “any person whose debts consist primarily of consumer debts and the value of whose nonexempt property is less than $204,425.4 Youngblood qualifies as a debt relief agency for … While the UST has established a clear and consistent pattern of violations on Youngblood’s part, the Court finds a civil penalty unnecessary as a deterrent.
Cited 0 timesUnknownChristopher D Smith and Misty Smith
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · May 5, 2022
The Code also defines “assisted person” as “any person whose debts consist primarily of consumer debts and the value of whose nonexempt property is less than $204,425.5 Youngblood qualifies as a debt relief agency for … While the UST has established a clear and consistent pattern of violations on Youngblood’s part, the Court finds a civil penalty unnecessary as a deterrent.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEric Robert Whittekiend and Sharla Kay Whittekiend
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · May 4, 2022
The Code also defines “assisted person” as “any person whose debts consist primarily of consumer debts and the value of whose nonexempt property is less than $204,425.4 Youngblood qualifies as a debt relief agency for … While the UST has established a clear and consistent pattern of violations on Youngblood’s part, the Court finds a civil penalty unnecessary as a deterrent.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · May 4, 2022
The Code also defines “assisted person” as “any person whose debts consist primarily of consumer debts and the value of whose nonexempt property is less than $204,425.4 Youngblood qualifies as a debt relief agency for … While the UST has established a clear and consistent pattern of violations on Youngblood’s part, the Court finds a civil penalty unnecessary as a deterrent.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLouis Davis Ellwood and Jessica Ellwood
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · May 4, 2022
The Code also defines “assisted person” as “any person whose debts consist primarily of consumer debts and the value of whose nonexempt property is less than $204,425.5 Youngblood qualifies as a debt relief agency for … While the UST has established a clear and consistent pattern of violations on Youngblood’s part, the Court finds a civil penalty unnecessary as a deterrent.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSandpoint Cattle Co. v. Craig (Sandpoint Cattle Co.)
553 B.R. 704 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · Jul 22, 2016
‘“[U]nder Nebraska law, the key to establishing lost profits is the establishment of a course of business activity through business records.’ ” Id. at 397-98 (quoting Triple R Indus., Inc., 912 F.2d at 238; Am. Rd. … Craig is not entitled to judgmental immunity. .
Cited 1 timesPublishedKassas v. The State Bar of California
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · Jun 15, 2021
“To qualify for reimbursement, an applicant must establish a loss of money or property that was received by an active attorney who was acting as an attorney or in a fiduciary capacity customary to the practice of law .. … The payments, therefore, are “clearly for the benefit of the public at large,” Brookman, 46 Cal. 3d at 1009, not for the benefit of Kassas’s victims.
Cited 0 timesUnknownChristopher Cook and Tausha Cook
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · May 4, 2022
The Code also defines “assisted person” as “any person whose debts consist primarily of consumer debts and the value of whose nonexempt property is less than $204,425.5 Youngblood qualifies as a debt relief agency for … While the UST has established a clear and consistent pattern of violations on Youngblood’s part, the Court finds a civil penalty unnecessary as a deterrent.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · May 4, 2022
The Code also defines “assisted person” as “any person whose debts consist primarily of consumer debts and the value of whose nonexempt property is less than $204,425.4 Youngblood qualifies as a debt relief agency for … While the UST has established a clear and consistent pattern of violations on Youngblood’s part, the Court finds a civil penalty unnecessary as a deterrent.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrian Andreasen and Kathryn A. Andreasen
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · May 4, 2022
But for the same fee, Youngblood also agrees to represent Debtors at the meeting of creditors, which clearly occurs post-petition. … The Code also defines “assisted person” as “any person whose debts consist primarily of consumer debts and the value of whose nonexempt property is less than $204,425.5 Youngblood qualifies as a debt relief agency for
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · May 4, 2022
The Code also defines “assisted person” as “any person whose debts consist primarily of consumer debts and the value of whose nonexempt property is less than $204,425.4 Youngblood qualifies as a debt relief agency for … While the UST has established a clear and consistent pattern of violations on Youngblood’s part, the Court finds a civil penalty unnecessary as a deterrent.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · May 4, 2022
The Code also defines “assisted person” as “any person whose debts consist primarily of consumer debts and the value of whose nonexempt property is less than $204,425.4 Youngblood qualifies as a debt relief agency for … While the UST has established a clear and consistent pattern of violations on Youngblood’s part, the Court finds a civil penalty unnecessary as a deterrent.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJohn E. Williams Jr., as of the Estate of v. Jackson
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · Mar 1, 2021
Corrugated Systems, Inc., 287 Ill.App.3d 623, 631 (1 Dist. 1997), stated: In order for a previous judgment to be conclusive, it must appear clearly and certainly that the identical and precise issue was decided in the previous … The issue is whether the Debtor’s conduct that led to the entry of either or both of the two probate court orders, which created two separate debts, qualifies as fraud under section 523(a)(2)(A).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna