Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFB

7,439 results

1.87s

  • Invitae Corporation

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 11, 2025

    Invitae’s Board also established a Special Commnittee to “evaluate strategic alternatives.” (AD0766-AD0767 J 8 & n.2.) … Swift); see also AD1189 ¥ 15 (“At the outset of the auction, the Debtors only had one qualified bid for $180 million from Labcorp.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Blythe v. Jones

    United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · Jul 13, 2021

    Jones’ January 23, 2020 paycheck included $3,294 for the reimbursement of expenses paid by the Defendants between February 28, 2018 and August 5, 2019.63 To qualify for the reimbursement, Mr. … Court further finds the Defendants suggestion that the omissions and improper disclosures were either merely inadvertent or should be excused because they failed to review the documents before they were filed is clearly

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Maria Louisa Sage

    United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 2022

    In other words, qualifying restitution and fines under §523(a)(7) may be “protected from discharge.” Id. at 43. … Sept. 28, 2020) (“The term ‘actual pecuniary loss’ clearly connotes measurable damages from particular instances of wrongdoing.”) (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Clean Harbors, Inc. v. Arkema, Inc. (In Re Safety-Kleen Corp.)

    380 B.R. 716 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Jan 3, 2008

    The Motion clearly distinguishes between the contents of “Exhibit A to the proposed Order” and the “Superfund Payment Chart”. … This was on the list of SF sites, on the 265 list and clearly part of due diligence. I am really surprised you guys are chunking.” D-36. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW I.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Charles Pernell Prophet and Shirley Ann Prophet

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · Oct 6, 2022

    § 109(h) (requiring that all individual debtors take a pre-bankruptcy credit briefing course and file a certificate evidencing such a course was completed); 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3) & (4) (establishing special automatic … Clearly, if Mr. Matthews does not understand it, the Debtors cannot provide informed consent in writing.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Christine Marie Naughton

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · Oct 6, 2022

    § 109(h) (requiring that all individual debtors take a pre-bankruptcy credit briefing course and file a certificate evidencing such a course was completed); 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3) & (4) (establishing special automatic … Clearly, if Mr. Matthews does not understand it, the Debtors cannot provide informed consent in writing.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Christine Marie Naughton

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · Oct 5, 2022

    § 109(h) (requiring that all individual debtors take a pre-bankruptcy credit briefing course and file a certificate evidencing such a course was completed); 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3) & (4) (establishing special automatic … Clearly, if Mr. Matthews does not understand it, the Debtors cannot provide informed consent in writing.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Christman v. Farina

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 18, 2023

    But “contractor's general representations regarding his expected work performance and the actual quality of that workmanship do not qualify as misrepresentations for purposes of section § 523(a)(2)(A).” … Farina is clearly an individual owner who staked his fortunes on the success of his business.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Steven Rosenschein

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · Oct 6, 2022

    § 109(h) (requiring that all individual debtors take a pre-bankruptcy credit briefing course and file a certificate evidencing such a course was completed); 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3) & (4) (establishing special automatic … Clearly, if Mr. Matthews does not understand it, the Debtors cannot provide informed consent in writing.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gould v. Liebl-Weaver

    United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 16, 2024

    several were not for Debtor, and a review of Defendants Exhibit 5 reveals a number are clearly associated with other jobs and not Debtor. … However, Great White Bison clearly stated it never handled or diagnosed the phones or computer system.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Charles Pernell Prophet and Shirley Ann Prophet

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · Oct 5, 2022

    § 109(h) (requiring that all individual debtors take a pre-bankruptcy credit briefing course and file a certificate evidencing such a course was completed); 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3) & (4) (establishing special automatic … Clearly, if Mr. Matthews does not understand it, the Debtors cannot provide informed consent in writing.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tepes v. Sage

    United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 2022

    In other words, qualifying restitution and fines under §523(a)(7) may be “protected from discharge.” Id. at 43. … Sept. 28, 2020) (“The term ‘actual pecuniary loss’ clearly connotes measurable damages from particular instances of wrongdoing.”) (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Z Constructors Nationwide, LLC v. Hadley, II

    United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · Jul 1, 2020

    Muhammad used Defendant’s signature stamp to execute the Release and Pay Applications is clearly inconsistent with his state court admission. … App’x. 561, 565 (5th Cir. 2011) (holding that electronically stored insurance policy documents qualify as original documents). 82 See Allstate Ins. Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fort, Trustee v. Daileader

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · Apr 19, 2022

    Soon after becoming Independent Director, Daileader realized the Debtors’ financial issues resulted largely from a lack of oversight and qualified management. … “[A]n attorney is immune from liability to third persons arising from the performance of his professional activities as an attorney on behalf of and with the knowledge of his client.” Gaar v. N.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Poseidon Pools of America, Inc.

    180 B.R. 718 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · Mar 29, 1995

    The necessity for personal retrieval of a conformed copy of an order from the court by an attorney or paralegal cannot be presumed; it must be established. If not established, it is not compensable. … This holding is clearly contrary to the plain meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 330 (a).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Lavender v. Bortz

    United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · May 16, 2025

    Dowdell responded to questions clearly, completely, and directly.46 Thus, the Court finds that Plaintiff and Mr. … Bortz owes any debt to Plaintiff As explained, the Scheduled Debt qualifies as a judicial admission.149 Therefore, Mrs.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fort, Trustee v. Daileader

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · Apr 19, 2022

    Soon after becoming Independent Director, Daileader realized the Debtors’ financial issues resulted largely from a lack of oversight and qualified management. … “[A]n attorney is immune from liability to third persons arising from the performance of his professional activities as an attorney on behalf of and with the knowledge of his client.” Gaar v. N.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Taylor v. Davis (In re Davis)

    494 B.R. 842 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · Jul 26, 2013

    On May 21, 2008, Defendant emailed Andrew Taylor: Tip, the terms are Gordon 3 committed to us after I asked them about it were unsecured (within reason of course, but you two certainly qualify), interest only, prime rate … However, in their motion for summary judgment, Plaintiffs clearly argued Defendant embezzled their money. Docket # 172, pp. 10-11.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In Re Pinti

    363 B.R. 369 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Mar 13, 2007

    It is well established that ‘when the statute’s language is plain, the sole function of the courts — at least where the disposition required by the text is not absurd — is to enforce it according to its terms.’ ” Lamie v. … Of course, secured creditors that do not qualify as 910 Creditors remain subject to bifurcation of their claims under Section 1325(a)(5)(B) unless barred by application of 11U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2). 8 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Fort, Trustee v. Daileader

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · Apr 19, 2022

    Soon after becoming Independent Director, Daileader realized the Debtors’ financial issues resulted largely from a lack of oversight and qualified management. … “[A]n attorney is immune from liability to third persons arising from the performance of his professional activities as an attorney on behalf of and with the knowledge of his client.” Gaar v. N.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.